Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] dt-bindings: display: bridge: Add bindings for Chipone ICN6211

[Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>]

On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 05:38:16PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 5:28 PM Robert Foss <robert.foss@linaro.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hey Jagan,
> >
> > Thanks for submitting this.
> >
> > checkpatch.pl threw some typ-o warnings, and I listed them below. I
> > think either spelling is correct, but 'spelling.txt' does list this as
> > a typ-o explicitly, so I would suggest conforming to that just to
> > silence the checkpatch warning.
> >
> > This patch also passes 'dt_binding_check' and 'dtbs_check', but I
> > think I'd like to defer to Rob Herring for an actual r-b.
> >
> > On Sun, 14 Feb 2021 at 18:55, Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > ICN6211 is MIPI-DSI to RGB Convertor bridge from Chipone.
> > >
> > > It has a flexible configuration of MIPI DSI signal input and
> > > produce RGB565, RGB666, RGB888 output format.
> > >
> > > Add dt-bingings for it.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com>
> > > ---
> > > Changes for v3:
> > > - updated to new dt-bindings style
> > >
> > >  .../display/bridge/chipone,icn6211.yaml       | 90 +++++++++++++++++++
> > >  1 file changed, 90 insertions(+)
> > >  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/chipone,icn6211.yaml
> > >
> > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/chipone,icn6211.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/chipone,icn6211.yaml
> > > new file mode 100644
> > > index 000000000000..13764f13fe46
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/chipone,icn6211.yaml
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,90 @@
> > > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> > > +%YAML 1.2
> > > +---
> > > +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/display/bridge/chipone,icn6211.yaml#
> > > +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> > > +
> > > +title: Chipone ICN6211 MIPI-DSI to RGB Converter bridge
> >
> > $ scripts/checkpatch.pl --git HEAD~0
> > WARNING: 'Convertor' may be misspelled - perhaps 'Converter'?
> 
> Thanks for pointing it.
> 
> I was aware of it before sending it and need to understand whether we
> need to use vendor naming conversion or not. Chipone call these
> devices are Convertor [1], So I have used the vendor notation for
> better understanding.
> 
> Any comments are this would be welcome?

Fix their spelling. If you need to propagate spelling/grammar errors, 
there's a defined way to do so.

Rob

> 
> [1] http://en.chiponeic.com/content/details45_123.html
> 
> Jagan.