From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA029C433DB for ; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 15:09:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB9AA61581 for ; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 15:09:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229711AbhC2PIc (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Mar 2021 11:08:32 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:53854 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229910AbhC2PI0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Mar 2021 11:08:26 -0400 Received: from mail-lj1-x22a.google.com (mail-lj1-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22a]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 57EC7C061574 for ; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 08:08:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lj1-x22a.google.com with SMTP id a1so16351326ljp.2 for ; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 08:08:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=PDDmFmsHZgwdbTfVjpjnsy2iBOi2U6nao1mVmmYBSic=; b=NknxoUeYE+8xYhdPNOy4TCHwUS7oxr8ZVQfzM27GSP4VpPbF7/6IVGywf8ZvgLaHTo Mgm/UKLTFfhxbUWGeOcuNQX4L6kGmGP51YwiUFR0hD8Pbqo08sFuQDrJhTmd1S3JNYue EfVct2+dHyokXqR4qu49Z9Eu/YQ9luAi87+beCEJantV8kRrroyCyPpNPJU1B8QD/Caj 1A3uTzvMVr/a4Yg7S/B0jo6vWs1gblfIYRsNHRkqNZNQrB8OxwhtvWCh0jr34HpurzJ/ WYUrv5v9v+8NeUM/vsFTa7KNR3pV3iI89YUCuI1vQkpQd+L/szys8vREFjg5xDn2cwnA V2yQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=PDDmFmsHZgwdbTfVjpjnsy2iBOi2U6nao1mVmmYBSic=; b=DQjr86iIrV6gj8bFow0slTX8ApY+StpxQmVsj10eerRvASBP7SiLW8nbRmJKn9g7RD zPk+84yTzPBRWO4Nl0OSSiqEgkGPInUw4aNaWd5vGjntP2hM8vkrJNeENgXPzKtz29H+ 2/SPsa2aNBBymTi0fRt5l9CScFuT/26SbXLUy3vviKoOiK8MnWAxbW02tyXuY7YM6eWB /gIDnUt2/hWJPgXt9Kxp1g0cKZceVWxQ2dLUEP9dwwQPk7xJuC3qcerXOxR6cjgOPMHx 53g2NIhSinsF9fTvjo0yDVuBaZTWjqYd0OyED0BJfMP2a1tHZM03PMJDK/GWoju0R1q/ cXvw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532gH4ihhNtfMQxuYGCIV+Li/ZHe2+snHFFIZDvxPMKAa4MKWakb R4M0uJkEypqFr1Bkhzt1MKs= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyzv+4TA8ltw+KgeNf2jfYPXfh2rNdpNFCj/iUr6AuE7N4cB3x+gwlwCt91EN/hXRPh9jYjJQ== X-Received: by 2002:a2e:8591:: with SMTP id b17mr17952575lji.230.1617030504907; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 08:08:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.lan (ip-194-187-74-233.konfederacka.maverick.com.pl. [194.187.74.233]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d4sm1865477lfs.45.2021.03.29.08.08.23 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 29 Mar 2021 08:08:24 -0700 (PDT) From: =?UTF-8?q?Rafa=C5=82=20Mi=C5=82ecki?= To: Miquel Raynal , Richard Weinberger , Vignesh Raghavendra , Rob Herring , Ansuel Smith Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, =?UTF-8?q?Rafa=C5=82=20Mi=C5=82ecki?= Subject: [PATCH RFC] dt-bindings: mtd: allow NVMEM cells in BCM4908 partitions Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2021 17:07:23 +0200 Message-Id: <20210329150723.26584-1-zajec5@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.26.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org From: Rafał Miłecki Every MTD partition can be NVMEM provider now. It's not handled by the shared partition.yaml so add proper "compatible" to the BCM4908. Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki --- Ideally I'd like to have: 1. partition.yaml allowing "nvmem-cells" by using nvmem-cells.yaml 2. brcm,bcm4908-partitions.yaml using partition.yaml and extending the compatible list by "brcm,bcm4908-firmware" I don't know if such a solution is possible to implement using YAML? Proposed solution (RFC) isn't a really clean one: 1. It duplicates "nvmem-cells" which is already in the nvmem-cells.yaml 2. Generic "nvmem-cells" should be part of the partition.yaml Rob? Help? :) --- .../bindings/mtd/partitions/brcm,bcm4908-partitions.yaml | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/partitions/brcm,bcm4908-partitions.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/partitions/brcm,bcm4908-partitions.yaml index 7b113e5e3421..28aa3bdd1103 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/partitions/brcm,bcm4908-partitions.yaml +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/partitions/brcm,bcm4908-partitions.yaml @@ -32,7 +32,9 @@ patternProperties: $ref: "partition.yaml#" properties: compatible: - const: brcm,bcm4908-firmware + enum: + - brcm,bcm4908-firmware + - nvmem-cells unevaluatedProperties: false required: -- 2.26.2