From: Cristian Ciocaltea <cristian.ciocaltea@gmail.com>
To: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@kernel.org>
Cc: "Andreas Färber" <afaerber@suse.de>,
"Rob Herring" <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-actions@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
matheus@castello.eng.br
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] Add support for Actions Semi Owl socinfo
Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2021 16:19:05 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210401131905.GA2001688@BV030612LT> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210401110752.GG14052@work>
On Thu, Apr 01, 2021 at 04:37:52PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> + Matheus
>
> On Thu, Apr 01, 2021 at 01:58:05PM +0300, Cristian Ciocaltea wrote:
> > Hi Mani, Andreas,
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 01, 2021 at 12:49:37PM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On 01.04.21 12:27, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Apr 01, 2021 at 12:40:41PM +0300, Cristian Ciocaltea wrote:
> > > >> On Thu, Apr 01, 2021 at 10:54:38AM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> > > >>> On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 04:48:15PM +0300, Cristian Ciocaltea wrote:
> > > >>>> This patchset adds a socinfo driver which provides information about
> > > >>>> Actions Semi Owl SoCs to user space via sysfs: machine, family, soc_id,
> > > >>>> serial_number.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Please note the serial number is currently available only for the S500
> > > >>>> SoC variant.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> This has been tested on the S500 SoC based RoseapplePi SBC.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Is this the soc_id provided by the vendor bootloader (uboot)? If so, under
> > > >>> what basis it provides? I don't think the SoC has the provision for
> > > >>> soc_id based on HW parameters.
> > > >>
> > > >> No, the soc_id is not provided by the bootloader, or at least I couldn't
> > > >> identify any related implementation. Instead, I provided this via the
> > > >> driver itself, since I've encountered this approach in some other soc
> > > >> drivers as well (e.g. imx/soc-imx.c, versatile/soc-integrator.c).
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > > Sorry, I was referring to serial_number. Since your comment says so, can
> > > > you point to the corresponding code?
> > >
> > > Seconded that this needs to be better understood. If this is just a
> > > convention of some downstream U-Boot that's not implemented in mainline
> > > (and maybe not even for Guitar or Labrador? tested on RoseapplePi only),
> > > it might not be worth its own reserved-memory based kernel driver?
> >
> > The serial number is actually provided by the s500-bootloader for which
> > Actions did not provide the source code, at least it is not available
> > in the xapp github repo. I did not find anything related to this in
> > downstream U-Boot.
> >
>
> Hmm, then we can consider this as the firmware dependent property. But
> can we get consensus that this is common for all S500 SoCs?
This should work on all S500 SoCs, as the downstream Linux kernel doesn't
use any conditional logic around reading those memory locations.
Please see "owl_check_revision()" in arch/arm/mach-owl/board-owl.c, from
any of the following repos:
* https://github.com/xapp-le/kernel
* https://github.com/LeMaker/linux-actions
> Maybe,
> Matheus can verify it on Labrador?
The verification is pretty straightforward: the serial number is dumped
on the serial console by the s500 bootloader right before starting
U-boot:
load uboot: load address is 0x8000000, entry point is 0x8000040
in fourth
chip serial no = 9d,4b,f,6d,31,46,e,8,
[...]
U-Boot 2015.04 (Apr 23 2020 - 23:01:25)Actions-Semi
The socinfo driver should provide the equivalent information, but in
reversed order (due to integer representation on LE arch):
$ cat /sys/devices/soc0/serial_number
080e46316d0f4b9d
> I don't think adding a SOCINFO driver for a single board is a good idea.
The driver could be used for all Owl SoC variants, including S700 and
S900, even though accessing the serial number is currently supported
only on S500.
Unfortunately I do only have this S500 SoC based SBC to experiment with,
therefore I cannot enable new features for the hardware I'm not able to
validate.
Btw, do you know where I could get an S700 or S900 board from? I
couldn't find any so far..
Thanks,
Cristi
> Thanks,
> Mani
>
> > Kind regards,
> > Cristi
> >
> > > Implementing a standard interface such as DMI tables or a DT property in
> > > mainline U-Boot may be more useful then. Is it still Mani's S900 only?
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Andreas
> > >
> > > --
> > > SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH
> > > Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
> > > GF: Felix Imendörffer
> > > HRB 36809 (AG Nürnberg)
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-01 17:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-30 13:48 [PATCH v2 0/6] Add support for Actions Semi Owl socinfo Cristian Ciocaltea
2021-03-30 13:48 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] dt-bindings: reserved-memory: Add Owl SoC serial number binding Cristian Ciocaltea
2021-04-01 17:07 ` Rob Herring
2021-04-01 17:40 ` Cristian Ciocaltea
2021-04-02 18:06 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2021-04-02 19:44 ` Cristian Ciocaltea
2021-03-30 13:48 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] dt-bindings: soc: actions: Add Actions Semi Owl socinfo binding Cristian Ciocaltea
2021-04-01 17:08 ` Rob Herring
2021-04-01 17:57 ` Cristian Ciocaltea
2021-04-02 18:04 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2021-04-02 19:25 ` Cristian Ciocaltea
2021-03-30 13:48 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] soc: actions: Add Actions Semi Owl socinfo driver Cristian Ciocaltea
2021-04-02 18:16 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2021-04-02 19:36 ` Cristian Ciocaltea
2021-03-30 13:48 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] arm: dts: owl-s500: Add reserved-memory range for Owl SoC serial number Cristian Ciocaltea
2021-03-30 13:48 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] arm: dts: owl-s500: Add socinfo support Cristian Ciocaltea
2021-03-30 13:48 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] MAINTAINERS: Add entries for Owl reserved-memory and socinfo bindings Cristian Ciocaltea
2021-04-01 5:24 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] Add support for Actions Semi Owl socinfo Manivannan Sadhasivam
2021-04-01 9:40 ` Cristian Ciocaltea
2021-04-01 10:27 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2021-04-01 10:49 ` Andreas Färber
2021-04-01 10:58 ` Cristian Ciocaltea
2021-04-01 11:07 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2021-04-01 13:19 ` Cristian Ciocaltea [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210401131905.GA2001688@BV030612LT \
--to=cristian.ciocaltea@gmail.com \
--cc=afaerber@suse.de \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-actions@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mani@kernel.org \
--cc=matheus@castello.eng.br \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox