From: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
To: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>,
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@siol.net>,
devicetree <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
linux-sunxi <linux-sunxi@googlegroups.com>,
Michael Weiser <michael.weiser@gmx.de>,
Daniel Kulesz <kuleszdl@posteo.org>
Subject: Re: [linux-sunxi] [PATCH] arm64: dts: allwinner: Revert SD card CD GPIO for Pine64-LTS
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2021 17:45:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210412174558.4ba90cf8@slackpad.fritz.box> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGb2v65uwo5Ns_ODNyX9S4H=cS6TGWCgaEyzhMaRaayxUtif2g@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, 12 Apr 2021 14:20:41 +0800
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 8:08 AM Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com> wrote:
> >
> > Commit 941432d00768 ("arm64: dts: allwinner: Drop non-removable from
> > SoPine/LTS SD card") enabled the card detect GPIO for the SOPine module,
> > along the way with the Pine64-LTS, which share the same base .dtsi.
> >
> > This was based on the observation that the Pine64-LTS has as "push-push"
> > SD card socket, and that the schematic mentions the card detect GPIO.
> >
> > After having received two reports about failing SD card access with that
> > patch, some more research and polls on that subject revealed that there
> > are at least two different versions of the Pine64-LTS out there:
> > - On some boards (including mine) the card detect pin is "stuck" at
> > high, regardless of an microSD card being inserted or not.
> > - On other boards the card-detect is working, but is active-high, by
> > virtue of an explicit inverter circuit, as shown in the schematic.
> >
> > To cover all versions of the board out there, and don't take any chances,
> > let's revert the introduction of the CD GPIO, and go back to the
> > non-removable property for the Pine64-LTS. That should avoid regressions
> > and should work for everyone.
> > The SOPine card detect has proven to be working, so let's keep that
> > GPIO in place.
> >
> > Fixes: 941432d00768 ("arm64: dts: allwinner: Drop non-removable from SoPine/LTS SD card")
> > Reported-by: Michael Weiser <michael.weiser@gmx.de>
> > Reported-by: Daniel Kulesz <kuleszdl@posteo.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
> > ---
> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64-pine64-lts.dts | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64-pine64-lts.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64-pine64-lts.dts
> > index e79ce49e7e6a..843338e19694 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64-pine64-lts.dts
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64-pine64-lts.dts
> > @@ -21,5 +21,5 @@
> > };
> >
> > &mmc0 {
> > - cd-gpios = <&pio 5 6 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>; /* PF6 push-push switch */
> > + non-removable; /* card detect is broken on some boards */
>
> So a revert is good, but has anyone tried using the "broken-cd" instead?
Ha, that's a good idea, I totally forgot about this property!
> That way, at least on Linux, the mmc core resorts to polling for a card.
> At least this way the card is still removable.
Yes indeed, I tested it on my "stuck at 1" Pine64-LTS, and it works like
a charm!
Daniel, Michael, can you test this on your boards? So removing the
cd-gpios property, and adding "broken-cd;" instead?
Cheers,
Andre
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-12 16:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-12 0:08 [PATCH] arm64: dts: allwinner: Revert SD card CD GPIO for Pine64-LTS Andre Przywara
2021-04-12 6:20 ` [linux-sunxi] " Chen-Yu Tsai
2021-04-12 16:45 ` Andre Przywara [this message]
2021-04-12 17:41 ` Michael Weiser
2021-04-12 17:51 ` Jernej Škrabec
2021-04-13 10:58 ` Andre Przywara
2021-04-13 18:48 ` Michael Weiser
2021-04-13 22:09 ` Daniel Kulesz
2021-04-14 10:35 ` Andre Przywara
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210412174558.4ba90cf8@slackpad.fritz.box \
--to=andre.przywara@arm.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jernej.skrabec@siol.net \
--cc=kuleszdl@posteo.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-sunxi@googlegroups.com \
--cc=michael.weiser@gmx.de \
--cc=mripard@kernel.org \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=wens@csie.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).