From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90F70C433ED for ; Mon, 10 May 2021 22:27:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 651F461601 for ; Mon, 10 May 2021 22:27:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230463AbhEJW24 (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 May 2021 18:28:56 -0400 Received: from eu-shark1.inbox.eu ([195.216.236.81]:49532 "EHLO eu-shark1.inbox.eu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230286AbhEJW2z (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 May 2021 18:28:55 -0400 Received: from eu-shark1.inbox.eu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by eu-shark1-out.inbox.eu (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2C1C6C00839; Tue, 11 May 2021 01:27:48 +0300 (EEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=mail.ee; s=20150108; t=1620685668; bh=xWFfR+zR2V4HCLUcrbkxEsgUhjNI5D6n3PJhw4hEfsk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=ixCQhipeCWCFICLwfnwwZVj16qJ4QTPs7lLH6Lp2cvrMNixV6gnaycXs4yNfZuq1T BuRUPA39yDsFt+V2tGDBXlRJqDLmSnF2fJhbVw84HPkkbE5kJCQvcNQbj4cGczJ+ga nyy0rBJPTYzVXS/vpU/+j4jsKf78AzKtstdswgj0= Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by eu-shark1-in.inbox.eu (Postfix) with ESMTP id C29216C00826; Tue, 11 May 2021 01:27:48 +0300 (EEST) Received: from eu-shark1.inbox.eu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (eu-shark1.inbox.eu [127.0.0.1]) (spamfilter, port 35) with ESMTP id LrlR4vqsLAT4; Tue, 11 May 2021 01:27:48 +0300 (EEST) Received: from mail.inbox.eu (eu-pop1 [127.0.0.1]) by eu-shark1-in.inbox.eu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FCB16C0081C; Tue, 11 May 2021 01:27:48 +0300 (EEST) Received: from pc (unknown [134.19.185.67]) (Authenticated sender: arzamas-16@mail.ee) by mail.inbox.eu (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 866C81BE011B; Tue, 11 May 2021 01:27:47 +0300 (EEST) Date: Tue, 11 May 2021 01:27:42 +0300 From: Boris Lysov To: Guenter Roeck Cc: matthias.bgg@gmail.com, robh+dt@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] watchdog: mtk_wdt: Refactor code to support more SoCs Message-ID: <20210511012742.569b63f7@pc> In-Reply-To: References: <20210131234425.9773-1-arzamas-16@mail.ee> <20210509211702.549-1-arzamas-16@mail.ee> <20210509211702.549-2-arzamas-16@mail.ee> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: OK X-ESPOL: 885mlYlKBD+tlF+pRmXYAhpV2ydIWeTj+e++1BlagAiJPFD4Yip+XRWr7hJ7DSP4og== Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Hello, On Mon, 10 May 2021 06:21:54 -0700 Guenter Roeck wrote: > > - struct mtk_wdt_dev *data = > > + struct mtk_wdt_dev *wdev = > > Please do not rename variables. If you dislike that the name matches the name > of the newly introduced structure element, find a different name for that. I will fix it in v3.