From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Stephan Gerhold <stephan@gerhold.net>,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
Cc: kbuild-all@lists.01.org, "Lars-Peter Clausen" <lars@metafoo.de>,
"Rob Herring" <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
"Robert Yang" <decatf@gmail.com>,
linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Michał Mirosław" <mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl>,
"Srinivas Pandruvada" <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>,
~postmarketos/upstreaming@lists.sr.ht
Subject: [RFC PATCH] iio: accel: kxcjk-1013: kx0231025_regs can be static
Date: Tue, 11 May 2021 21:14:22 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210511131422.GA31783@86ca4a2db576> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210511095409.9290-4-stephan@gerhold.net>
drivers/iio/accel/kxcjk-1013.c:224:30: warning: symbol 'kx0231025_regs' was not declared. Should it be static?
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
---
kxcjk-1013.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iio/accel/kxcjk-1013.c b/drivers/iio/accel/kxcjk-1013.c
index 5aa2a1cb2309d..1e5e241f2bcdf 100644
--- a/drivers/iio/accel/kxcjk-1013.c
+++ b/drivers/iio/accel/kxcjk-1013.c
@@ -221,7 +221,7 @@ const struct kx_chipset_regs kxtf9_regs = {
};
/* The registers have totally different names but the bits are compatible */
-const struct kx_chipset_regs kx0231025_regs = {
+static const struct kx_chipset_regs kx0231025_regs = {
.int_src1 = KX023_REG_INS2,
.int_src2 = KX023_REG_INS3,
.int_rel = KX023_REG_INT_REL,
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-11 13:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-11 9:54 [PATCH 0/3] iio: accel: kxcjk-1013: Add support for KX023-1025 Stephan Gerhold
2021-05-11 9:54 ` [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: iio: kionix,kxcjk1013: Document kionix,kx023-1025 Stephan Gerhold
2021-05-11 9:54 ` [PATCH 2/3] iio: accel: kxcjk-1013: Refactor configuration registers into struct Stephan Gerhold
2021-05-11 12:37 ` kernel test robot
2021-05-11 12:37 ` [RFC PATCH] iio: accel: kxcjk-1013: kxcjk1013_regs can be static kernel test robot
2021-05-11 9:54 ` [PATCH 3/3] iio: accel: kxcjk-1013: Add support for KX023-1025 Stephan Gerhold
2021-05-11 13:14 ` kernel test robot
2021-05-11 13:14 ` kernel test robot [this message]
2021-05-11 10:44 ` [PATCH 0/3] " Hans de Goede
2021-05-11 14:10 ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-05-11 14:28 ` Michał Mirosław
2021-05-11 14:38 ` Stephan Gerhold
2021-05-11 14:50 ` Michał Mirosław
2021-05-13 16:14 ` Jonathan Cameron
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210511131422.GA31783@86ca4a2db576 \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=decatf@gmail.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=kbuild-all@lists.01.org \
--cc=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
--cc=stephan@gerhold.net \
--cc=~postmarketos/upstreaming@lists.sr.ht \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).