From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0305DC433ED for ; Fri, 21 May 2021 01:58:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D81CC6135C for ; Fri, 21 May 2021 01:58:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S238072AbhEUB77 (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 May 2021 21:59:59 -0400 Received: from mail-ot1-f54.google.com ([209.85.210.54]:46015 "EHLO mail-ot1-f54.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S238017AbhEUB76 (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 May 2021 21:59:58 -0400 Received: by mail-ot1-f54.google.com with SMTP id t10-20020a05683022eab0290304ed8bc759so16649531otc.12 for ; Thu, 20 May 2021 18:58:36 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=vvC4Y8CR9bI+JUYqRL1jBowD94kwSZdRtPupkAiyU5s=; b=sJaz6QTTEJt2ZXLxYE3PoUxqlw2NS7VUE0KlfrZvRfriiamolMb7mRnSW4Ptcl9/yt yQACqawLEXRwmWzEO4L+d9ZWccgI9UAPUP3zEMq0CQGf9KZNvmxnq/0AtrTGbvRWygzI Jg82AqiiyzffLQY/vCXYT4x3nmWgppfgVdo+LyCuA9roYWiBv2ZLAXGp9MrAj5lpWfS7 hlff43u2Fh5yO5ZqNJOVzzTx/oPz9Me4kti5Jq3wKZbcI2e1d1S6x8yCj9DDI9xDFM2b AtB7eTSPDnvtXjepjHgvldDBqGepM+cg62oY1hPFFj9S/VPsOyV1qhdIv1X3ANM93rCL oVsQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531JFHqI+uVD0h0XdxIgLPB3eBIutokDf8Vh9vteeacnYMLUl8Ii Do5HVpBtc6BdSET5kRyu6Q== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyAx6OTiaug8hpl/Ku5ud6j2Rhov9Ij5B1x90Qa5sT7b+rPzq86IuC4/9eZlCjqNDcA0pfM2g== X-Received: by 2002:a9d:7610:: with SMTP id k16mr3917154otl.32.1621562316433; Thu, 20 May 2021 18:58:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from robh.at.kernel.org (24-155-109-49.dyn.grandenetworks.net. [24.155.109.49]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o18sm1018873otp.61.2021.05.20.18.58.35 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 20 May 2021 18:58:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: (nullmailer pid 2496157 invoked by uid 1000); Fri, 21 May 2021 01:58:34 -0000 Date: Thu, 20 May 2021 20:58:34 -0500 From: Rob Herring To: Miquel Raynal Cc: Tudor Ambarus , Amit Kumar Mahapatra , Richard Weinberger , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Helmut Grohne , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, Naga Sureshkumar Relli , Siva Durga Prasad Paladugu , Rob Herring , Michal Simek , Srinivas Goud , Thomas Petazzoni , Vignesh Raghavendra Subject: Re: [PATCH v20 06/19] dt-binding: memory: pl353-smc: Drop unsupported nodes from the example Message-ID: <20210521015834.GA2496096@robh.at.kernel.org> References: <20210519182636.1110080-1-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com> <20210519182636.1110080-7-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210519182636.1110080-7-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 19 May 2021 20:26:23 +0200, Miquel Raynal wrote: > These nodes are given as examples and are not described nor used > anywhere else. There is also no hardware of my knowledge compatible with > these yet. If we want to be backward compatible, then we should avoid > partially describing nodes and their content while there are no users. > Plus, the examples are wrong (the addresses should be updated) so > let's drop them before converting this file to yaml (only the NAND node, > which will be fixed in the example and described somewhere else is > kept). > > Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal > --- > .../bindings/memory-controllers/pl353-smc.txt | 10 ---------- > 1 file changed, 10 deletions(-) > Reviewed-by: Rob Herring