From: Rudi Heitbaum <rudi@heitbaum.com>
To: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel@collabora.com>
Cc: Peter Geis <pgwipeout@gmail.com>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..."
<linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
chenjh@rock-chips.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: fan53555: add back tcs4526
Date: Thu, 27 May 2021 12:29:15 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210527122911.GA1640@7698f5da3a10> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <462b8d80447efb6c00e93704914169bceb5adc4d.camel@collabora.com>
Hi Ezequiel and Peter,
Thanks for the feedback.
On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 08:51:27AM -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
> Hi Rudi,
>
> Thanks for the patch.
>
> On Thu, 2021-05-27 at 10:59 +0000, Rudi Heitbaum wrote:
> > On Wed, May 26, 2021 at 02:41:00PM -0400, Peter Geis wrote:
> > > On Wed, May 26, 2021 at 12:23 PM Rudi Heitbaum <rudi@heitbaum.com> wrote:
...
> > I chose to follow the example of silergy,syr827 and silergy,syr828 for
> > tcs4526 (given I made the mistake in assuming that support for tcs4525
> > meant support for tcs4525.) This would maintain consistency of naming
> > of
> > tcs4526 throughout the source. Is that ok?
>
> It's fine to have both compatibles (and avoids confusion in
> device-trees), just remember to update the dt-bindings as well.
> It's funny to see drivers with both schemes, so we really have to
> decide which path we want to go down.
> Considering the syr827/syr828 as convention, we should probably just
> go down that route for consistency within the driver.
Thanks Peter - I will resubmit the tcs4526 patch along these lines.
> > Removal of the operating points kind of makes the gpu regulator
> > moot, don't you think?
> As Peter rightly said, this will prevent gpu devfreq from working.
This is the draft that I have been working on within LibreELEC10, still
a ways to go I'm afraid. Having decided to getting the SBC to run
mainline kernel and u-boot. The regulator and subsequent regulator fix
will hopefully address https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=212917
too. As you have identified - it is not ready for upstreaming :-)
Thank you both for the direction and pointers on the dts. I will get the
v2 patch going first.
> Out of curiosity, why disabling the little VOP?
Only disabled within my WIP dts so as to focus my attention on successful
running of LE10 on the rk3399pro, before I move to attempting to enable
the NPU and the other nodes.
> I can be wrong, but I think regulator-compatible is deprecated.
I will look it to this.
Now with the addition of the regulator and Peter's fix I will start
qualifing each of the dts nodes and the correct options against the
schematic.
> > +??????????????????????????????vsel-gpios = <&gpio1 RK_PC1 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
>
> Is vsel-gpios ever used in the mainline driver?
>
> > +??????????????????????????????regulator-compatible = "fan53555-reg";
>
> Ditto.
>
> > +??????????????????????????????vsel-gpios = <&gpio1 RK_PB6 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
>
> Ditto.
>
> > +??????????????????????????????regulator-boot-on;
>
> Just out of curiosity, is regulator-boot-on really needed for the GPU?
Will check.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-27 12:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-26 16:23 [PATCH] regulator: fan53555: add back tcs4526 Rudi Heitbaum
2021-05-26 18:41 ` Peter Geis
2021-05-27 10:59 ` Rudi Heitbaum
2021-05-27 11:26 ` Peter Geis
2021-05-27 13:03 ` Mark Brown
2021-05-27 11:51 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2021-05-27 12:29 ` Rudi Heitbaum [this message]
2021-05-27 13:05 ` Mark Brown
2021-05-28 10:27 ` Rudi Heitbaum
2021-05-28 10:19 ` [PATCH v2] regulator: fan53555: add tcs4526 Rudi Heitbaum
2021-06-01 12:56 ` Mark Brown
2021-06-04 16:32 ` Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210527122911.GA1640@7698f5da3a10 \
--to=rudi@heitbaum.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=chenjh@rock-chips.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ezequiel@collabora.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=pgwipeout@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).