From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE90BC47089 for ; Thu, 27 May 2021 20:26:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CD7C613CC for ; Thu, 27 May 2021 20:26:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235263AbhE0U1d (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 May 2021 16:27:33 -0400 Received: from mail-oi1-f176.google.com ([209.85.167.176]:41956 "EHLO mail-oi1-f176.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S235696AbhE0U1b (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 May 2021 16:27:31 -0400 Received: by mail-oi1-f176.google.com with SMTP id c3so2021481oic.8 for ; Thu, 27 May 2021 13:25:56 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=d80yU/ahixz8PlwCHjjGT73dCXWqG9MsiBJDbg1V8UM=; b=qmMX+uEpqZGr2b4qOEITQ2Jj05MzJoXq8Jjb6nJcGa05gBWc6Mj2q+swt9Hi0tclMu KNI/eGHEs8SWWmrf8Ql2gwbTF4fx5oPBT0bxhHdsfYfS0dkXrVevcDrz/mqNyGM+kzUf pICEU2LYMlSi2rolAuLaLVzY86q4ry3F5aOQ89jSphKKsNiOn2DKQI+QGIrslv0GYfo6 3DLuMF0simF7VEvqMfQDUwCcjcmszKbhv1dzlVaaj2hSO8NjDT3Cg0d42nnBwwqMch1g xN/E+obR3KV9K3Rn3gCCU8egTpcp/mCjiN6Jua5pyMxlaDHEm+3qeXeuXPTu5ciLj/F1 lbJg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533JTj7Sfwb4CeieAmw2gELjmjLxzbR76ws44vMbDhPpyxrXOvYM 83kkD4qeG1pWU8GHz6R96A== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzcHmM36bqnc111XjTTPeU8u0gD1R5gEnCCEUVspTHdoRK0OMh8gHMlgLDC0/ohrawc17E8dg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:128a:: with SMTP id a10mr6776116oiw.161.1622147156437; Thu, 27 May 2021 13:25:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from robh.at.kernel.org (24-155-109-49.dyn.grandenetworks.net. [24.155.109.49]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u201sm699720oia.10.2021.05.27.13.25.54 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 27 May 2021 13:25:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: (nullmailer pid 1355340 invoked by uid 1000); Thu, 27 May 2021 20:25:54 -0000 Date: Thu, 27 May 2021 15:25:54 -0500 From: Rob Herring To: Sudeep Holla Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Cristian Marussi , Kevin Hilman , Neil Armstrong , Jerome Brunet Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] dt-bindings: firmware: arm,scpi: Move arm,scpi-shmem to json schema Message-ID: <20210527202554.GA1351447@robh.at.kernel.org> References: <20210526182807.548118-1-sudeep.holla@arm.com> <20210526182807.548118-2-sudeep.holla@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210526182807.548118-2-sudeep.holla@arm.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Wed, May 26, 2021 at 07:28:00PM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote: > Move the SRAM and shared memory binding for SCPI into the existing > Generic on-chip SRAM. We just need to update the compatible list and > there-by remove the whole old text format binding for the same. > > Cc: Rob Herring > Cc: Kevin Hilman > Cc: Neil Armstrong > Cc: Jerome Brunet > Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla > --- > .../devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,scpi.txt | 15 --------------- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sram/sram.yaml | 1 + > 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 15 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,scpi.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,scpi.txt > index bcd6c3ec471e..bcb8b3d61e68 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,scpi.txt > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,scpi.txt > @@ -56,21 +56,6 @@ Sub-nodes > node. It can be non linear and hence provide the mapping of identifiers > into the clock-output-names array. > > -SRAM and Shared Memory for SCPI > -------------------------------- > - > -A small area of SRAM is reserved for SCPI communication between application > -processors and SCP. > - > -The properties should follow the generic mmio-sram description found in [3] > - > -Each sub-node represents the reserved area for SCPI. > - > -Required sub-node properties: > -- reg : The base offset and size of the reserved area with the SRAM > -- compatible : should be "arm,scp-shmem" for Non-secure SRAM based > + - arm,scpi-shmem Which is correct? There's not a single other occurrance in the kernel tree of either. Rob