From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-12.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D81CFC48BCF for ; Sat, 12 Jun 2021 15:08:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7A38613AD for ; Sat, 12 Jun 2021 15:08:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230200AbhFLPK5 (ORCPT ); Sat, 12 Jun 2021 11:10:57 -0400 Received: from mail-ed1-f51.google.com ([209.85.208.51]:44686 "EHLO mail-ed1-f51.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230191AbhFLPK5 (ORCPT ); Sat, 12 Jun 2021 11:10:57 -0400 Received: by mail-ed1-f51.google.com with SMTP id u24so40603603edy.11; Sat, 12 Jun 2021 08:08:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=MyHAGIpkkv5FhdCV+dmubHT6fI0J4Qtzj9J4fslDtcQ=; b=W0TBv8YxPCk0CMIX/i/QLdgS9KiKeQNoLDvGMD8SlDDMPEk6JkrNmNWNTTwzESG1DS VocDE82KQpTdDCqbqJn9RnvauCxSTCdFPH0GvzqxPLAfzKxYE5RsZ4RIbhMQ5LDR+H35 zoRR+nzmC0a1z4dA97a7ZhTm6+eH4/zUC47HyMZKzVDU59gg250UVuGDeaVKnCvFbjb0 GJ2HEvLaGKba8mdh7LQ0i4DLMzZaRLWsayayPUaFwVAY054QBMNB2YrSpcOJtc/LEEB+ va0d42hOiUVzQa60NOHtISexG3n0qBdKgrIAy6bwb1z6ZtPsemBkGGQjvIXwkf+puHb1 uJ/w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=MyHAGIpkkv5FhdCV+dmubHT6fI0J4Qtzj9J4fslDtcQ=; b=pgT8hxxXWFahFkoXrjMH2bzbsGG4Fvm8do5sKRTjiQdxUxJOwsc800w3uhPyud+OlH X1+Y7M0/zWoCvtaTDj+gP+71KNtahrne39+yAGEShzutd8KiZr0x6arXcyV2Aus3/nQx sNyZ9Wy2rgRA15eHhqF9VkkPNVpVBYRafKqYgvhoFkZjMFqtrJ6SY5A9uS7y8l/bCgJe N+Q6ciyE0d3gG5V2SzK4qAzb8aUEjZ4TSTv7VI5T8ONHAursgf+4iZa2LGWhoOYQo8n8 90yx0RsY48NDSYD8zoLx7YGmHLXro6cwRvlGeb6FGXQzeLWVdrNbAbBKQXfXXt4MY2kd XZlA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531JPg1g83B18P0qRupt+lefKA7VidLlpleT9l5bJGOY+7hucwLf NO/4SCTlCCRhdhekHuA0OhY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzxp36MU7OxaYVh1dgVnXetWoZR9dLwm9Xiwc/QVPJuVTP+udohcInDHSZkGVZKBTRk6s1urA== X-Received: by 2002:a50:d943:: with SMTP id u3mr9250028edj.175.1623510476839; Sat, 12 Jun 2021 08:07:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from skbuf ([188.26.52.84]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n5sm4002476edd.40.2021.06.12.08.07.55 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 12 Jun 2021 08:07:56 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2021 18:07:55 +0300 From: Vladimir Oltean To: Matthew Hagan List-Id: Cc: Florian Fainelli , Andrew Lunn , Rob Herring , Arnd Bergmann , Olof Johansson , soc@kernel.org, Ray Jui , Scott Branden , bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com, Geert Uytterhoeven , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Sam Ravnborg , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] dt-bindings: arm: bcm: NSP: add Meraki MX64/MX65 Message-ID: <20210612150755.efb5hw3xujkkh2va@skbuf> References: <20210610232727.1383117-1-mnhagan88@gmail.com> <20210610232727.1383117-2-mnhagan88@gmail.com> <20210611194644.64lvhvp76wy6guqp@skbuf> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Jun 12, 2021 at 10:21:31AM +0100, Matthew Hagan wrote: > Hi Vladimir, > > Many thanks for taking the time to review the submission. > > On 11/06/2021 20:46, Vladimir Oltean wrote: > > > On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 12:27:13AM +0100, Matthew Hagan wrote: > >> Add bindings for the Meraki MX64/MX65 series. Note this patch should be > >> applied on top of "dt-bindings: arm: bcm: add NSP devices to SoCs". > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Matthew Hagan > >> --- > >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/bcm/brcm,nsp.yaml | 6 ++++++ > >> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) > >> > >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/bcm/brcm,nsp.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/bcm/brcm,nsp.yaml > >> index 78dfa315f3d0..7d184ba7d180 100644 > >> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/bcm/brcm,nsp.yaml > >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/bcm/brcm,nsp.yaml > >> @@ -62,6 +62,12 @@ properties: > >> - enum: > >> - brcm,bcm958625hr > >> - brcm,bcm958625k > >> + - meraki,mx64 > >> + - meraki,mx64-a0 > >> + - meraki,mx64w > >> + - meraki,mx64w-a0 > >> + - meraki,mx65 > >> + - meraki,mx65w > >> - const: brcm,bcm58625 > >> - const: brcm,nsp > >> > >> -- > >> 2.26.3 > >> > > I think these compatibles describe SoCs, whereas Meraki MX64/MX65 are > > boards, so this is a miscategorization. Can you not just describe the > > Northstar Plus SoC that you are using in your compatible string? > > My understanding is that the bcm958625hr and bcm958625k are dev boards > using the BCM58625 SoC variant of NSP. For reference, a close example > can be found in brcm,bcm4708.yaml in the same directory: > > - description: BCM53012 based boards > items: > - enum: > - brcm,bcm953012er > - brcm,bcm953012hr > - brcm,bcm953012k > - meraki,mr32 > - const: brcm,brcm53012 > - const: brcm,brcm53016 > - const: brcm,bcm4708 > > For the compatible string we would definitely need to specify a unique > device name for identification by the OS, rather than just the SoC. > > Of course I could be mistaken. Will await confirmation on this. Yeah, ok, fair, after rechecking I think you're right. I'm dropping this charge.