From: Colin Foster <colin.foster@in-advantage.com>
To: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>
Cc: andrew@lunn.ch, vivien.didelot@gmail.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com,
davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, robh+dt@kernel.org,
claudiu.manoil@nxp.com, alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com,
UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com, linux@armlinux.org.uk,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 net-next 1/8] net: dsa: ocelot: remove unnecessary pci_bar variables
Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2021 09:36:38 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210711163638.GB2219684@euler> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210710195318.jq3xu2gkbttmcsfy@skbuf>
On Sat, Jul 10, 2021 at 10:53:18PM +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 10, 2021 at 12:25:55PM -0700, Colin Foster wrote:
> > The pci_bar variables for the switch and imdio don't make sense for the
> > generic felix driver. Moving them to felix_vsc9959 to limit scope and
> > simplify the felix_info struct.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Colin Foster <colin.foster@in-advantage.com>
> > ---
>
> Reviewed-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
>
> Just one comment below.
>
> > drivers/net/dsa/ocelot/felix.h | 2 --
> > drivers/net/dsa/ocelot/felix_vsc9959.c | 11 +++++------
> > 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/ocelot/felix.h b/drivers/net/dsa/ocelot/felix.h
> > index 4d96cad815d5..47769dd386db 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/dsa/ocelot/felix.h
> > +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/ocelot/felix.h
> > @@ -20,8 +20,6 @@ struct felix_info {
> > int num_ports;
> > int num_tx_queues;
> > struct vcap_props *vcap;
> > - int switch_pci_bar;
> > - int imdio_pci_bar;
> > const struct ptp_clock_info *ptp_caps;
> >
> > /* Some Ocelot switches are integrated into the SoC without the
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/ocelot/felix_vsc9959.c b/drivers/net/dsa/ocelot/felix_vsc9959.c
> > index f966a253d1c7..182ca749c8e2 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/dsa/ocelot/felix_vsc9959.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/ocelot/felix_vsc9959.c
> > @@ -1359,8 +1359,6 @@ static const struct felix_info felix_info_vsc9959 = {
> > .num_mact_rows = 2048,
> > .num_ports = 6,
> > .num_tx_queues = OCELOT_NUM_TC,
> > - .switch_pci_bar = 4,
> > - .imdio_pci_bar = 0,
> > .quirk_no_xtr_irq = true,
> > .ptp_caps = &vsc9959_ptp_caps,
> > .mdio_bus_alloc = vsc9959_mdio_bus_alloc,
> > @@ -1388,6 +1386,9 @@ static irqreturn_t felix_irq_handler(int irq, void *data)
> > return IRQ_HANDLED;
> > }
> >
> > +#define VSC9959_SWITCH_PCI_BAR 4
> > +#define VSC9959_IMDIO_PCI_BAR 0
> > +
>
> I would prefer these to be declared right below
>
> #define VSC9959_TAS_GCL_ENTRY_MAX 63
>
> and aligned with it
Done
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-11 16:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-10 19:25 [RFC PATCH v2 net-next 0/8] Add support for VSC7511-7514 chips over SPI Colin Foster
2021-07-10 19:25 ` [RFC PATCH v2 net-next 1/8] net: dsa: ocelot: remove unnecessary pci_bar variables Colin Foster
2021-07-10 19:53 ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-07-11 16:36 ` Colin Foster [this message]
2021-07-10 19:25 ` [RFC PATCH v2 net-next 2/8] net: dsa: ocelot: felix: move MDIO access to a common location Colin Foster
2021-07-10 19:59 ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-07-10 20:02 ` Alexandre Belloni
2021-07-11 16:41 ` Colin Foster
2021-07-10 19:25 ` [RFC PATCH v2 net-next 3/8] net: dsa: ocelot: felix: NULL check on variable Colin Foster
2021-07-10 20:06 ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-07-11 16:47 ` Colin Foster
2021-07-10 19:25 ` [RFC PATCH v2 net-next 4/8] net: dsa: ocelot: felix: add interface for custom regmaps Colin Foster
2021-07-10 19:25 ` [RFC PATCH v2 net-next 5/8] net: mscc: ocelot: split register definitions to a separate file Colin Foster
2021-07-10 19:26 ` [RFC PATCH v2 net-next 6/8] net: mscc: ocelot: expose ocelot wm functions Colin Foster
2021-07-10 20:36 ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-07-10 19:26 ` [RFC PATCH v2 net-next 7/8] net: dsa: ocelot: felix: add support for VSC75XX control over SPI Colin Foster
2021-07-10 20:52 ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-07-11 17:09 ` Colin Foster
2021-07-11 22:13 ` Alexandre Belloni
2021-07-10 19:26 ` [RFC PATCH v2 net-next 8/8] Update documentation for the VSC7512 SPI device Colin Foster
2021-07-10 20:34 ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-07-11 16:58 ` Colin Foster
2021-07-10 19:47 ` [RFC PATCH v2 net-next 0/8] Add support for VSC7511-7514 chips over SPI Vladimir Oltean
2021-07-11 16:32 ` Colin Foster
2021-07-10 20:01 ` Alexandre Belloni
2021-07-11 16:44 ` Colin Foster
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210711163638.GB2219684@euler \
--to=colin.foster@in-advantage.com \
--cc=UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com \
--cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=claudiu.manoil@nxp.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=olteanv@gmail.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=vivien.didelot@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).