From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69513C433EF for ; Tue, 7 Sep 2021 15:27:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 439F3610C9 for ; Tue, 7 Sep 2021 15:27:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1345241AbhIGP3B (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Sep 2021 11:29:01 -0400 Received: from fllv0016.ext.ti.com ([198.47.19.142]:59918 "EHLO fllv0016.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1345088AbhIGP3B (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Sep 2021 11:29:01 -0400 Received: from lelv0265.itg.ti.com ([10.180.67.224]) by fllv0016.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 187FRlfn090525; Tue, 7 Sep 2021 10:27:47 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1631028467; bh=R6Fwfw4yCoT2K+/rUzObEsKmUCONj1UZWuAEKdsff4g=; h=Date:From:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=lYDGWzolleSgSQJHDNMH99Diz7jA83gZOLdqlkD0gSnHKR6zMZDd3jffls82iOCYC i1YupKMEvizBrdmSWzX3rL55Ld5PdFtk37ZjsZ1NXtFmbDzNYO6WSA7LZEcWNQxzmp Ic86b7iH2XqbCwhYkBNfixZgveW0AapFx85AgBWs= Received: from DLEE102.ent.ti.com (dlee102.ent.ti.com [157.170.170.32]) by lelv0265.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 187FRlui040440 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 7 Sep 2021 10:27:47 -0500 Received: from DLEE103.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.33) by DLEE102.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.32) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2308.14; Tue, 7 Sep 2021 10:27:47 -0500 Received: from fllv0040.itg.ti.com (10.64.41.20) by DLEE103.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.33) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2308.14 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 7 Sep 2021 10:27:47 -0500 Received: from localhost (ileax41-snat.itg.ti.com [10.172.224.153]) by fllv0040.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 187FRkXl015106; Tue, 7 Sep 2021 10:27:47 -0500 Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2021 10:27:46 -0500 From: Nishanth Menon To: Jan Kiszka CC: Tero Kristo , Rob Herring , , , , Bao Cheng Su , Chao Zeng Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] arm64: dts: ti: iot2050: Flip mmc device ordering on Advanced devices Message-ID: <20210907152746.fbddtkktvx6hb5ti@cattishly> References: <8e2e435ef67868cb98382b44c51ddb5c8d045d66.1631024536.git.jan.kiszka@siemens.com> <20210907151301.7fqwmc7hmcyhhybv@carve> <35e0cadf-526c-6402-fb8e-8cdb8b7a0bfe@siemens.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <35e0cadf-526c-6402-fb8e-8cdb8b7a0bfe@siemens.com> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20171215 X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 17:20-20210907, Jan Kiszka wrote: > On 07.09.21 17:13, Nishanth Menon wrote: > > On 16:22-20210907, Jan Kiszka wrote: > >> From: Jan Kiszka > >> > >> This ensures that the SD card will remain mmc0 across Basic and Advanced > >> devices, also avoiding surprises for users coming from the downstream > >> kernels. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka > >> --- > >> arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am6548-iot2050-advanced.dts | 5 +++++ > >> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) > >> > >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am6548-iot2050-advanced.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am6548-iot2050-advanced.dts > >> index ec9617c13cdb..d1d5278e0b94 100644 > >> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am6548-iot2050-advanced.dts > >> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am6548-iot2050-advanced.dts > >> @@ -18,6 +18,11 @@ / { > >> compatible = "siemens,iot2050-advanced", "ti,am654"; > >> model = "SIMATIC IOT2050 Advanced"; > >> > >> + aliases { > >> + mmc0 = &sdhci1; > >> + mmc1 = &sdhci0; > >> + }; > > > > > > Should we do this at SoC level? > > > > Well, I wouldn't mind - but that would also impact your EVMs. For us, > this is fine as we are coming from that ordering above with our > downstream kernel/dts. > I think it'd probably be a welcome change. overall we've standardized on partuuid. -- Regards, Nishanth Menon Key (0xDDB5849D1736249D) / Fingerprint: F8A2 8693 54EB 8232 17A3 1A34 DDB5 849D 1736 249D