From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-18.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E765EC433F5 for ; Tue, 21 Sep 2021 15:23:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEDA860240 for ; Tue, 21 Sep 2021 15:23:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233295AbhIUPYk (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Sep 2021 11:24:40 -0400 Received: from mo4-p01-ob.smtp.rzone.de ([85.215.255.52]:23636 "EHLO mo4-p01-ob.smtp.rzone.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233837AbhIUPYi (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Sep 2021 11:24:38 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1632237787; s=strato-dkim-0002; d=gerhold.net; h=References:In-Reply-To:Message-Id:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:Cc:Date: From:Subject:Sender; bh=Mn6STB2mKFNw5lkE3KQV6CgCSU0VfjctWesLRX+6DBE=; b=RE33oTpygs0xOUtNx4RhF7qHZs7gCpirkFNKgj4drZ96qExytbSbzU/hBpwiCfytI4 tzzyMFuzsOhUW2+EP1cBEHhffUAHEmBVUrHb8H8wCvxaBU97gIrEhRcHzKfGR4Bd5VPo tpGR1dmzUT0CwN3MTe2DEw6pDkgGOHpDhiC1/3K0488ulgo0F8vs4Gq8TaiQjym5oBMk 0DbH5XYEZPNxH7OF2zEsz0WH49lTOCbqDuB999WeThB65Caq/m6OrD3MZ8jsFKzsP6wJ KVChTpjyWISTMGYjEv7ujOOBnpqE07IU0gfMYM46zL9u51yS6uhk59CeKEjKfL+NbBlo 0hDA== Authentication-Results: strato.com; dkim=none X-RZG-AUTH: ":P3gBZUipdd93FF5ZZvYFPugejmSTVR2nRPhVORvLd4SsytBXTbAOHjRHIhr2eFOATg==" X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo00 Received: from droid.. by smtp.strato.de (RZmta 47.33.8 DYNA|AUTH) with ESMTPSA id 301038x8LFN7ARN (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate); Tue, 21 Sep 2021 17:23:07 +0200 (CEST) From: Stephan Gerhold To: Bjorn Andersson Cc: Andy Gross , linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, ~postmarketos/upstreaming@lists.sr.ht, Stephan Gerhold Subject: [PATCH 3/3] arm64: dts: qcom: msm8916: Add "qcom,msm8916-sdhci" compatible Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2021 17:21:20 +0200 Message-Id: <20210921152120.6710-3-stephan@gerhold.net> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.33.0 In-Reply-To: <20210921152120.6710-1-stephan@gerhold.net> References: <20210921152120.6710-1-stephan@gerhold.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org According to Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/sdhci-msm.txt a SoC specific compatible should be used in addition to the IP version compatible, but for some reason it was never added for MSM8916. Add the "qcom,msm8916-sdhci" compatible additionally to make the device tree match the documented bindings. Signed-off-by: Stephan Gerhold --- arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8916.dtsi | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8916.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8916.dtsi index 95dea20cde75..5879be0805b6 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8916.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8916.dtsi @@ -1420,7 +1420,7 @@ lpass_codec: audio-codec@771c000 { }; sdhc_1: sdhci@7824000 { - compatible = "qcom,sdhci-msm-v4"; + compatible = "qcom,msm8916-sdhci", "qcom,sdhci-msm-v4"; reg = <0x07824900 0x11c>, <0x07824000 0x800>; reg-names = "hc_mem", "core_mem"; @@ -1438,7 +1438,7 @@ sdhc_1: sdhci@7824000 { }; sdhc_2: sdhci@7864000 { - compatible = "qcom,sdhci-msm-v4"; + compatible = "qcom,msm8916-sdhci", "qcom,sdhci-msm-v4"; reg = <0x07864900 0x11c>, <0x07864000 0x800>; reg-names = "hc_mem", "core_mem"; -- 2.33.0