From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6105AC433F5 for ; Thu, 16 Dec 2021 20:11:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232287AbhLPULZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Dec 2021 15:11:25 -0500 Received: from mga18.intel.com ([134.134.136.126]:45350 "EHLO mga18.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229867AbhLPULZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Dec 2021 15:11:25 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1639685484; x=1671221484; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=OQ5tkb+mKf19Kj1M+JmkRU5CzgVeDU43EXvvxHFHGWI=; b=PcpvfIiNV53TrZm2klx4lDdL/vHa7+3AWA1ewruvp/iLBMDtC4Ycr7J7 Puyf7QGpD7XXBQeNsgSqY6tWOMO4ZmrsFuJPTI8KExT+zrwxdLliomzyq krYT67ddUzInMikV1/I6/ALXnLlsl/zXwIkCUliWdkPmP2YGvIyoJNX3z gHYbKbjmWAnaMNXmFEo/DwB1KIfTYV7XvoK0AYBToMFqbn4+5UV82SCUl FdvfZCy3v02vrn/KMQk9Ht8d8qJF2iwOBZYZzY0vVgLsXDuqtNH14uAiw i7AHTsKc1tKFi6ViWr5bigHkzw68yB6wWzreUWtnve/xCThVGKbiOZgzp g==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6200,9189,10200"; a="226446288" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.88,212,1635231600"; d="scan'208";a="226446288" Received: from orsmga003.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.27]) by orsmga106.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 16 Dec 2021 12:11:24 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.88,212,1635231600"; d="scan'208";a="464817797" Received: from lkp-server02.sh.intel.com (HELO 9f38c0981d9f) ([10.239.97.151]) by orsmga003.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 16 Dec 2021 12:11:21 -0800 Received: from kbuild by 9f38c0981d9f with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mxx60-0003kZ-Sg; Thu, 16 Dec 2021 20:11:20 +0000 Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2021 04:10:58 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Miquel Raynal , Mark Brown , linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, Richard Weinberger , Vignesh Raghavendra , Tudor Ambarus , Pratyush Yadav , Michael Walle , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, Rob Herring , devicetree@vger.kernel.org Cc: kbuild-all@lists.01.org Subject: [RFC PATCH] spi: spi-mem: mxic_spi_mem_caps can be static Message-ID: <20211216201057.GA15223@5de6fc93f9bd> References: <20211216111654.238086-21-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20211216111654.238086-21-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com> X-Patchwork-Hint: ignore User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org drivers/spi/spi-mxic.c:446:38: warning: symbol 'mxic_spi_mem_caps' was not declared. Should it be static? Reported-by: kernel test robot Signed-off-by: kernel test robot --- spi-mxic.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-mxic.c b/drivers/spi/spi-mxic.c index 8f8530bd37794..e137b1ec85d40 100644 --- a/drivers/spi/spi-mxic.c +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-mxic.c @@ -443,7 +443,7 @@ static int mxic_spi_mem_exec_op(struct spi_mem *mem, return ret; } -const struct spi_controller_mem_caps mxic_spi_mem_caps = { +static const struct spi_controller_mem_caps mxic_spi_mem_caps = { .dtr = true, };