devicetree.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
To: "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>, Leo Li <leoyang.li@nxp.com>,
	Biwen Li <biwen.li@nxp.com>, "Z.Q. Hou" <zhiqiang.hou@nxp.com>,
	Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt@linutronix.de>,
	Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 devicetree] Revert "arm64: dts: freescale: Fix 'interrupt-map' parent address cells"
Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2021 18:13:51 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211231181350.qwfnrwvdfnfssdjt@skbuf> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211214135852.2934670-1-vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>

Hello,

On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 03:58:52PM +0200, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> This reverts commit 869f0ec048dc8fd88c0b2003373bd985795179fb. That
> updated the expected device tree binding format for the ls-extirq
> driver, without also updating the parsing code (ls_extirq_parse_map)
> to the new format.
> 
> The context is that the ls-extirq driver uses the standard
> "interrupt-map" OF property in a non-standard way, as suggested by
> Rob Herring during review:
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190927161118.GA19333@bogus/
> 
> This has turned out to be problematic, as Marc Zyngier discovered
> through commit 041284181226 ("of/irq: Allow matching of an interrupt-map
> local to an interrupt controller"), later fixed through commit
> de4adddcbcc2 ("of/irq: Add a quirk for controllers with their own
> definition of interrupt-map"). Marc's position, expressed on multiple
> opportunities, is that:
> 
> (a) [ making private use of the reserved "interrupt-map" name in a
>     driver ] "is wrong, by the very letter of what an interrupt-map
>     means. If the interrupt map points to an interrupt controller,
>     that's the target for the interrupt."
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/87k0g8jlmg.wl-maz@kernel.org/
> 
> (b) [ updating the driver's bindings to accept a non-reserved name for
>     this property, as an alternative, is ] "is totally pointless. These
>     machines have been in the wild for years, and existing DTs will be
>     there *forever*."
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/87ilvrk1r0.wl-maz@kernel.org/
> 
> Considering the above, the Linux kernel has quirks in place to deal with
> the ls-extirq's non-standard use of the "interrupt-map". These quirks
> may be needed in other operating systems that consume this device tree,
> yet this is seen as the only viable solution.
> 
> Therefore, the premise of the patch being reverted here is invalid.
> It doesn't matter whether the driver, in its non-standard use of the
> property, complies to the standard format or not, since this property
> isn't expected to be used for interrupt translation by the core.
> 
> This change restores LS1088A, LS2088A/LS2085A and LX2160A to their
> previous bindings, which allows these systems to continue to use
> external interrupt lines with the correct polarity.
> 
> Fixes: 869f0ec048dc ("arm64: dts: freescale: Fix 'interrupt-map' parent address cells")
> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
> ---
> v1->v2: remove the other 9 patches that rename "interrupt-map" to
>         "fsl,extirq-map", at Marc's suggestion.

Could this patch be considered for merging in v5.16? The problem is
going to be quite a bit more severe and tricky to fix otherwise. Thanks.

  reply	other threads:[~2021-12-31 18:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-12-14 13:58 [PATCH v2 devicetree] Revert "arm64: dts: freescale: Fix 'interrupt-map' parent address cells" Vladimir Oltean
2021-12-31 18:13 ` Vladimir Oltean [this message]
2022-01-02 13:08   ` Marc Zyngier
2022-01-03 11:30     ` Shawn Guo
2022-02-09 11:54       ` Ioana Ciornei
2022-03-10 20:09         ` Vladimir Oltean
2022-03-14 15:15 ` Rob Herring
2022-03-14 15:34   ` Marc Zyngier
2022-03-14 16:08     ` Rob Herring

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20211231181350.qwfnrwvdfnfssdjt@skbuf \
    --to=vladimir.oltean@nxp.com \
    --cc=biwen.li@nxp.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kurt@linutronix.de \
    --cc=leoyang.li@nxp.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
    --cc=zhiqiang.hou@nxp.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).