From: Christophe Kerello <christophe.kerello@foss.st.com>
To: <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>, <richard@nod.at>, <vigneshr@ti.com>,
<robh+dt@kernel.org>, <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
Cc: <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com>,
<devicetree@vger.kernel.org>, <chenshumin86@sina.com>,
Christophe Kerello <christophe.kerello@foss.st.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 3/4] nvmem: core: Fix a conflict between MTD and NVMEM on wp-gpios property
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2022 10:57:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220131095755.8981-4-christophe.kerello@foss.st.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220131095755.8981-1-christophe.kerello@foss.st.com>
Wp-gpios property can be used on NVMEM nodes and the same property can
be also used on MTD NAND nodes. In case of the wp-gpios property is
defined at NAND level node, the GPIO management is done at NAND driver
level. Write protect is disabled when the driver is probed or resumed
and is enabled when the driver is released or suspended.
When no partitions are defined in the NAND DT node, then the NAND DT node
will be passed to NVMEM framework. If wp-gpios property is defined in
this node, the GPIO resource is taken twice and the NAND controller
driver fails to probe.
It would be possible to set config->wp_gpio at MTD level before calling
nvmem_register function but NVMEM framework will toggle this GPIO on
each write when this GPIO should only be controlled at NAND level driver
to ensure that the Write Protect has not been enabled.
A way to fix this conflict is to add a new boolean flag in nvmem_config
named skip_wp_gpio. In case skip_wp_gpio is set, the GPIO resource will
be managed by the provider.
Signed-off-by: Christophe Kerello <christophe.kerello@foss.st.com>
---
Changes in v2:
- rework the proposal done to fix a conflict between MTD and NVMEM on
wp-gpios property.
drivers/nvmem/core.c | 2 +-
include/linux/nvmem-provider.h | 4 +++-
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/nvmem/core.c b/drivers/nvmem/core.c
index 23a38dcf0fc4..cb40dca6a51d 100644
--- a/drivers/nvmem/core.c
+++ b/drivers/nvmem/core.c
@@ -771,7 +771,7 @@ struct nvmem_device *nvmem_register(const struct nvmem_config *config)
if (config->wp_gpio)
nvmem->wp_gpio = config->wp_gpio;
- else
+ else if (!config->skip_wp_gpio)
nvmem->wp_gpio = gpiod_get_optional(config->dev, "wp",
GPIOD_OUT_HIGH);
if (IS_ERR(nvmem->wp_gpio)) {
diff --git a/include/linux/nvmem-provider.h b/include/linux/nvmem-provider.h
index 98efb7b5660d..4b480023c265 100644
--- a/include/linux/nvmem-provider.h
+++ b/include/linux/nvmem-provider.h
@@ -70,7 +70,8 @@ struct nvmem_keepout {
* @word_size: Minimum read/write access granularity.
* @stride: Minimum read/write access stride.
* @priv: User context passed to read/write callbacks.
- * @wp-gpio: Write protect pin
+ * @wp-gpio: Write protect pin
+ * @skip_wp_gpio: Write Protect pin is managed by the provider.
*
* Note: A default "nvmem<id>" name will be assigned to the device if
* no name is specified in its configuration. In such case "<id>" is
@@ -92,6 +93,7 @@ struct nvmem_config {
enum nvmem_type type;
bool read_only;
bool root_only;
+ bool skip_wp_gpio;
struct device_node *of_node;
bool no_of_node;
nvmem_reg_read_t reg_read;
--
2.25.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-31 10:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-01-31 9:57 [PATCH v2 0/4] mtd: rawnand: stm32_fmc2: Add NAND Write Protect support Christophe Kerello
2022-01-31 9:57 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] dt-binding: mtd: nand: Document the wp-gpios property Christophe Kerello
2022-01-31 9:57 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] mtd: rawnand: stm32_fmc2: Add NAND Write Protect support Christophe Kerello
2022-01-31 9:57 ` Christophe Kerello [this message]
2022-02-17 11:01 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] nvmem: core: Fix a conflict between MTD and NVMEM on wp-gpios property Srinivas Kandagatla
2022-02-17 13:00 ` Christophe Kerello
2022-01-31 9:57 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] mtd: " Christophe Kerello
2022-01-31 13:43 ` Miquel Raynal
2022-02-01 10:47 ` Pratyush Yadav
2022-02-02 10:44 ` Christophe Kerello
2022-02-02 10:57 ` Miquel Raynal
2022-02-02 11:53 ` Pratyush Yadav
2022-02-16 8:46 ` Christophe Kerello
2022-02-16 9:24 ` Srinivas Kandagatla
2022-02-17 8:48 ` Miquel Raynal
2022-02-17 11:00 ` Srinivas Kandagatla
2022-02-17 14:08 ` Miquel Raynal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220131095755.8981-4-christophe.kerello@foss.st.com \
--to=christophe.kerello@foss.st.com \
--cc=chenshumin86@sina.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
--cc=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org \
--cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).