devicetree.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Clément Léger" <clement.leger@bootlin.com>
To: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Cc: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>,
	Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
	Lars Povlsen <lars.povlsen@microchip.com>,
	Steen Hegelund <Steen.Hegelund@microchip.com>,
	UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com,
	Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>,
	Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
	Allan Nielsen <allan.nielsen@microchip.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] add fwnode support to reset subsystem
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2022 09:24:34 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220405092434.6e424ed4@fixe.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Ykst0Vb4fk+iALzc@robh.at.kernel.org>

Le Mon, 4 Apr 2022 12:41:37 -0500,
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> a écrit :

> On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 03:12:34PM +0100, Clément Léger wrote:
> > This series is part of a larger series which aims at adding fwnode
> > support in multiple subsystems [1]. The goal of this series was to
> > add support for software node in various subsystem but in a first
> > time only the fwnode support had gained consensus and will be added
> > to multiple subsystems.  
> 
> The goal is describing a solution. What is the problem?
> 
> What's the scenario where you have a reset provider not described by 
> firmware providing resets to devices (consumers) also not described by 
> firmware.

Hi Rob, there was a link attached to this series since there was a
previous one that was sent which described the problem. Here is a link
to the same thread but to a specific message which clarifies the
problem and the solutions that were mentionned by other maintainers
(ACPI overlays, DT overlays, software nodes and so on):

https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20220224154040.2633a4e4@fixe.home/

> 
> > For the moment ACPI node support is excluded from the fwnode support
> > to avoid creating an unspecified ACPI reset device description. With
> > these modifications, both driver that uses the fwnode_ API or the of_
> > API to register the reset controller will be usable by consumer
> > whatever the type of node that is used.  
> 
> Good, because controlling reset lines directly isn't how the ACPI device 
> model works AFAIK.

This was based on Mark Brown feedback.

> 
> > One question raised by this series is that I'm not sure if all reset
> > drivers should be modified to use the new fwnode support or keep the
> > existing device-tree support. Maintainer advice on that particular
> > question will be welcome.  
> 
> That would be pointless churn IMO. Why do we need to convert drivers 
> which the vast majority will never use anything but DT?

To have a single interface to maintain and to remove duplicated fields
(of_node, fwnode, fwnode_xlate, of_xlate) from reset controller struct.


-- 
Clément Léger,
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineer at Bootlin
https://bootlin.com

  reply	other threads:[~2022-04-05  7:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-03-24 14:12 [PATCH v2 0/3] add fwnode support to reset subsystem Clément Léger
2022-03-24 14:12 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] of: add function to convert fwnode_reference_args to of_phandle_args Clément Léger
2022-03-24 14:12 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] reset: add support for fwnode Clément Léger
2022-03-24 14:12 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] reset: mchp: sparx5: set fwnode field of reset controller Clément Léger
2022-04-04 17:41 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] add fwnode support to reset subsystem Rob Herring
2022-04-05  7:24   ` Clément Léger [this message]
2022-04-05 14:47     ` Rob Herring
2022-04-05 15:51       ` Clément Léger
2022-04-05 17:11         ` Rob Herring
2022-04-05 21:28           ` Rob Herring
2022-04-06  7:52             ` Clément Léger
2022-04-06 13:04               ` Rob Herring
2022-04-06  7:40           ` Clément Léger
2022-04-06 13:19             ` Rob Herring
2022-04-06 13:33               ` Alexandre Belloni
2022-04-06 13:36                 ` Clément Léger
2022-04-08 15:48               ` Clément Léger
2022-04-25 10:21                 ` Philipp Zabel
2022-04-25 11:18                   ` Clément Léger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220405092434.6e424ed4@fixe.home \
    --to=clement.leger@bootlin.com \
    --cc=Steen.Hegelund@microchip.com \
    --cc=UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com \
    --cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
    --cc=allan.nielsen@microchip.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=frowand.list@gmail.com \
    --cc=lars.povlsen@microchip.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=p.zabel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).