From: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@towertech.it>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: rtc: Add TI K3 RTC devicetree bindings documentation
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2022 10:45:09 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220413154509.2bllkjdnp7r2f7fd@remindful> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2609cb4e-df0e-f4b5-b89f-37287bbc569d@linaro.org>
On 08:42-20220413, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 13/04/2022 00:17, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> >>> + assigned-clocks:
> >>> + description: |
> >>> + override default osc32k parent clock reference to the osc32k clock entry
> >>> + maxItems: 1
> >>> +
> >>> + assigned-clock-parents:
> >>> + description: |
> >>> + override default osc32k parent clock phandle of the new parent clock of osc32k
> >>> + maxItems: 1
> >>
> >> Usually assigned-clockXXX are not needed in the bindings. Is here
> >> something different? They are put only to indicate something special.
> >
> > I wonder if I should rather use unevaluatedproperties instead? If I use
> > additionalProperties: False, then the second example below fails.
> >
>
> Are you sure it fails? I just checked and it worked in my case. This
> AFAIR was working since some time (or fixed some time ago), so maybe
> update your dtschema?
Arrgh, Thanks and you are right.
Apologies, I should have cross checked again since developing late
last year (understood the min schema currently is 2022.3).
Will fix this up in the repost v2 in a short while.
--
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
Key (0xDDB5849D1736249D) / Fingerprint: F8A2 8693 54EB 8232 17A3 1A34 DDB5 849D 1736 249D
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-13 15:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-12 7:31 [PATCH 0/2] rtc: Introduce rtc-ti-k3 Nishanth Menon
2022-04-12 7:31 ` [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: rtc: Add TI K3 RTC devicetree bindings documentation Nishanth Menon
2022-04-12 12:06 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-04-12 22:17 ` Nishanth Menon
2022-04-13 6:42 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-04-13 15:45 ` Nishanth Menon [this message]
2022-04-14 15:53 ` Rob Herring
2022-04-12 7:31 ` [PATCH 2/2] rtc: Introduce ti-k3-rtc Nishanth Menon
2022-04-14 0:45 ` Andrew Davis
2022-04-15 8:03 ` Vignesh Raghavendra
2022-04-15 8:14 ` Alexandre Belloni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220413154509.2bllkjdnp7r2f7fd@remindful \
--to=nm@ti.com \
--cc=a.zummo@towertech.it \
--cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).