From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5480AC433FE for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2022 15:33:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1380249AbiDTPgN (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Apr 2022 11:36:13 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:37310 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234264AbiDTPgN (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Apr 2022 11:36:13 -0400 Received: from mail-pl1-x630.google.com (mail-pl1-x630.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::630]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E47D53BBD5; Wed, 20 Apr 2022 08:33:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pl1-x630.google.com with SMTP id c23so2135797plo.0; Wed, 20 Apr 2022 08:33:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=6juSp7uBXn7UkeeyHXBBY9ySqJnhll6cqmIkDC8no9Y=; b=qgcXcpJZM7EfRwyvLvIU/ZAWtrNANZUquKekYbz7sLAVux/6s/3qLncm1EKtkfB1WO hmfqpAk6sq4DFIRUmOIExfF08wFNHlGTHaB8KaZ5UZTDYY5mDfAxExdxMQVO2wsbiXKl NFRez+jYC6VMB47AjbTZnLWSlEOW1TEqO4fz5d9eZo6p4Ba7i1GGWOqS0QvI91lbJK/U LNwlCIRu2eqj2M1iTMaWzpyjHMEfu8jIvXu5NSLVB5JexHJGn7KsNAiEfsN6OQvsb2Uh 6gmEIZhU5UdUJT3/ACsRrK8Yfgim0C0vm7ebc19owYVdsHlZyT3SwT63MQfJJ1eGRt3r isag== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=6juSp7uBXn7UkeeyHXBBY9ySqJnhll6cqmIkDC8no9Y=; b=A3O3zxg+LcUfCwCJZCC9NnIv6FEaFBY3f6wkU8ZK0SZ07RSOErWILXvFtkTctEUlaQ /t0155nZvWKPTbhOESg2HTnqjD3Yi2OkWQNjjwNVV7EZT8Ekq/N9cnRJD/V//GScgTmv /8vsCPorQnzbzYWHnKV8Vx6K1LsDgyNmdlrqXeJjxxxV2GLmo/Dt+Z6RWLFsJurJ46fJ kLZSLinnBtQB2yS2OhhY3d6ZaSQV6X0eh3OF6KvL9HUIoubfP12+sqLYVWP+O6li1ubm iWlbAg8fHbFArh3JIjIO4gW+qxygQQYW89ffM4r9RvW5463b4drW6usosydYiYq6oQ0K FbWQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5300woOGMMi6QTmiwcAoMOiL/HIJN2VkCVO/kuyIcYGgXrKtAPA5 8ISuJqUYqAAbfjujTpddRwmF0tenfUg= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz22tndu6if9K9efIAj/OMeUaGdf1i3J+kAmBbzzu/YPOcSwfl8sH14/vdSLHcr05W1onRsJw== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:ce05:b0:1d0:805b:ac3a with SMTP id f5-20020a17090ace0500b001d0805bac3amr5213508pju.49.1650468803420; Wed, 20 Apr 2022 08:33:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 9a2d8922b8f1 ([122.161.51.18]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z70-20020a633349000000b003aa663f95ffsm2918724pgz.25.2022.04.20.08.33.19 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 20 Apr 2022 08:33:23 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2022 21:03:16 +0530 From: Kuldeep Singh To: Bhupesh Sharma Cc: Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Andy Gross , Bjorn Andersson , Vinod Koul , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, dmaengine@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/6] dt-bindings: dma: Convert Qualcomm BAM DMA binding to json format Message-ID: <20220420153316.GA63129@9a2d8922b8f1> References: <20220410175056.79330-1-singh.kuldeep87k@gmail.com> <20220410175056.79330-7-singh.kuldeep87k@gmail.com> <20220418192012.GA6868@9a2d8922b8f1> <1965ed9f-0258-cd28-f1c3-ef87272f6c03@linaro.org> <20220420132955.GA63070@9a2d8922b8f1> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220420132955.GA63070@9a2d8922b8f1> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Apr 20, 2022 at 06:59:55PM +0530, Kuldeep Singh wrote: > > I appreciate your work Kuldeep, it is important and valuable > > contribution. It is sad to see duplicated effort, I don't like it for my > > own patches either. In general, I believe the FIFO approach should be > > applied, so in this case Bhupesh patches. > > Yep, I also agree with FIFO approach w.r.t contributions. But one thing > daunts me here is the waiting time with latest revision, it's too high. > > Anyway, Bhupesh had more than BAM changes and was already on v5, I can > give benefit of doubt to him and won't argue much here. > > Bhupesh, feel free to include my armv7 based dts patches in your series > otherwise you might stumble DT checks warnings. Or do you want me to keep my changes separate? Sorry for spam.