From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: Cixi Geng <gengcixi@gmail.com>
Cc: lars@metafoo.de, robh+dt@kernel.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org, orsonzhai@gmail.com,
baolin.wang7@gmail.com, zhang.lyra@gmail.com,
yuming.zhu1@unisoc.com, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 3/7] iio: adc: Fine tune the scale calibration values
Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2022 18:28:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220424182834.1d8b5d7e@jic23-huawei> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220424180147.02d3c8ca@jic23-huawei>
On Sun, 24 Apr 2022 18:01:47 +0100
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Apr 2022 22:24:54 +0800
> Cixi Geng <gengcixi@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > From: Cixi Geng <cixi.geng1@unisoc.com>
> >
> > Small adjustment the scale calibration value for the sc2731,
> > use new name sc2731_[big|small]_scale_graph_calib, and remove
> > the origin [big|small]_scale_graph_calib struct for unused.
> >
> > Fixes: 8ba0dbfd07a35 (iio: adc: sc27xx: Add ADC scale calibration)
> No blank line here.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Cixi Geng <cixi.geng1@unisoc.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/iio/adc/sc27xx_adc.c | 19 +++++++++++--------
> > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/sc27xx_adc.c b/drivers/iio/adc/sc27xx_adc.c
> > index aee076c8e2b1..24211d2a71b1 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iio/adc/sc27xx_adc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/sc27xx_adc.c
> > @@ -103,14 +103,17 @@ static struct sc27xx_adc_linear_graph small_scale_graph = {
> > 100, 341,
> > };
> >
> > -static const struct sc27xx_adc_linear_graph big_scale_graph_calib = {
> > - 4200, 856,
> > - 3600, 733,
> > +/*
> > + * Add the sc2731_[big|small]_scale_graph_calib for sc2731 pmic.
> > + */
>
> Why Add?
>
> Given the variable naming conveys this anyway, I would drop the comment entirely.
I dropped the comment whilst applying and added sc27xx to the patch title prefix.
>
> > +static const struct sc27xx_adc_linear_graph sc2731_big_scale_graph_calib = {
> > + 4200, 850,
> > + 3600, 728,
> > };
> >
> > -static const struct sc27xx_adc_linear_graph small_scale_graph_calib = {
> > - 1000, 833,
> > - 100, 80,
> > +static const struct sc27xx_adc_linear_graph sc2731_small_scale_graph_calib = {
> > + 1000, 838,
> > + 100, 84,
> > };
> >
> > static int sc27xx_adc_get_calib_data(u32 calib_data, int calib_adc)
> > @@ -130,11 +133,11 @@ static int sc27xx_adc_scale_calibration(struct sc27xx_adc_data *data,
> > size_t len;
> >
> > if (big_scale) {
> > - calib_graph = &big_scale_graph_calib;
> > + calib_graph = &sc2731_big_scale_graph_calib;
> > graph = &big_scale_graph;
> > cell_name = "big_scale_calib";
> > } else {
> > - calib_graph = &small_scale_graph_calib;
> > + calib_graph = &sc2731_small_scale_graph_calib;
> > graph = &small_scale_graph;
> > cell_name = "small_scale_calib";
> > }
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-24 17:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-19 14:24 [PATCH V4 0/7] iio: adc: sc27xx: adjust structure and add PMIC's support Cixi Geng
2022-04-19 14:24 ` [PATCH V4 1/7] dt-bindings:iio:adc: add sprd,ump9620-adc dt-binding Cixi Geng
2022-04-20 7:01 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-04-24 17:21 ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-04-19 14:24 ` [PATCH V4 2/7] iio: adc: sc27xx: fix read big scale voltage not right Cixi Geng
2022-04-24 17:00 ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-04-19 14:24 ` [PATCH V4 3/7] iio: adc: Fine tune the scale calibration values Cixi Geng
2022-04-24 17:01 ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-04-24 17:28 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2022-04-19 14:24 ` [PATCH V4 4/7] iio: adc: sc27xx: structure adjustment and optimization Cixi Geng
2022-04-19 14:24 ` [PATCH V4 5/7] iio: adc: refactor some functions for support more PMiCs Cixi Geng
2022-04-24 17:30 ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-04-19 14:24 ` [PATCH V4 6/7] iio: adc: sc27xx: add support for PMIC sc2720 and sc2721 Cixi Geng
2022-04-19 14:24 ` [PATCH V4 7/7] iio: adc: sc27xx: add support for PMIC sc2730 Cixi Geng
2022-04-24 17:34 ` [PATCH V4 0/7] iio: adc: sc27xx: adjust structure and add PMIC's support Jonathan Cameron
2022-04-29 4:25 ` Cixi Geng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220424182834.1d8b5d7e@jic23-huawei \
--to=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=baolin.wang7@gmail.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gengcixi@gmail.com \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
--cc=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=orsonzhai@gmail.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=yuming.zhu1@unisoc.com \
--cc=zhang.lyra@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).