Re: [PATCH v11 0/9] RZN1 DMA support

[Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>]

Hi Geert,

geert@linux-m68k.org wrote on Mon, 25 Apr 2022 18:05:34 +0200:

> Hi Miquel,
> 
> On Thu, Apr 21, 2022 at 10:51 AM Miquel Raynal
> <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com> wrote:
> > This is the series bringing DMA support to RZN1 platforms.
> > Other series follow with eg. UART and RTC support as well.  
> 
> Thanks for your series!
> 
> > There is no other conflicting dependency with the other series, so this
> > series can now entirely be merged in the dmaengine tree I believe.
> >
> > Changes in v11:
> > * Renamed two defines.
> > * Changed the way the bitmap is declared.
> > * Updated the cover letter: this series can now go in through the
> >   dmaengine tree.  
> 
> /me confused
> 
> > Miquel Raynal (9):
> >   dt-bindings: dmaengine: Introduce RZN1 dmamux bindings
> >   dt-bindings: clock: r9a06g032-sysctrl: Reference the DMAMUX subnode
> >   dt-bindings: dmaengine: Introduce RZN1 DMA compatible
> >   soc: renesas: rzn1-sysc: Export function to set dmamux
> >   dmaengine: dw: dmamux: Introduce RZN1 DMA router support
> >   clk: renesas: r9a06g032: Probe possible children
> >   dmaengine: dw: Add RZN1 compatible
> >   ARM: dts: r9a06g032: Add the two DMA nodes
> >   ARM: dts: r9a06g032: Describe the DMA router  
> 
> The last two DTS parts have to go in through the renesas-arm-dt and
> soc trees.

Yes, DT usually never go in through subsystem trees anyway, of
course they should be taken in through the Renesas tree. For the other
patches I think its simpler if everything goes through the dmaengine
tree, but I'm fine either way, I'll let you discuss this with the DMA
folks if you disagree.

Thanks,
Miquèl