Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/5] net: ipqess: introduce the Qualcomm IPQESS driver

[Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com>]

Hi Andrew,

On Mon, 16 May 2022 04:51:03 +0200
Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> wrote:

> > +static int ipqess_tx_ring_alloc(struct ipqess *ess)
> > +{
> > +	struct device *dev = &ess->pdev->dev;
> > +	int i;
> > +
> > +	for (i = 0; i < IPQESS_NETDEV_QUEUES; i++) {
> > +		struct ipqess_tx_ring *tx_ring = &ess->tx_ring[i];
> > +		size_t size;
> > +		u32 idx;
> > +
> > +		tx_ring->ess = ess;
> > +		tx_ring->ring_id = i;
> > +		tx_ring->idx = i * 4;
> > +		tx_ring->count = IPQESS_TX_RING_SIZE;
> > +		tx_ring->nq = netdev_get_tx_queue(ess->netdev, i);
> > +
> > +		size = sizeof(struct ipqess_buf) *
> > IPQESS_TX_RING_SIZE;
> > +		tx_ring->buf = devm_kzalloc(dev, size, GFP_KERNEL);
> > +		if (!tx_ring->buf) {
> > +			netdev_err(ess->netdev, "buffer alloc of
> > tx ring failed");
> > +			return -ENOMEM;
> > +		}  
> 
> kzalloc() is pretty loud when there is no memory. So you see patches
> removing such warning messages.

Ack, I'll remove that

> > +static int ipqess_rx_napi(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget)
> > +{
> > +	struct ipqess_rx_ring *rx_ring = container_of(napi, struct
> > ipqess_rx_ring,
> > +						    napi_rx);
> > +	struct ipqess *ess = rx_ring->ess;
> > +	u32 rx_mask = BIT(rx_ring->idx);
> > +	int remain_budget = budget;
> > +	int rx_done;
> > +	u32 status;
> > +
> > +poll_again:
> > +	ipqess_w32(ess, IPQESS_REG_RX_ISR, rx_mask);
> > +	rx_done = ipqess_rx_poll(rx_ring, remain_budget);
> > +
> > +	if (rx_done == remain_budget)
> > +		return budget;
> > +
> > +	status = ipqess_r32(ess, IPQESS_REG_RX_ISR);
> > +	if (status & rx_mask) {
> > +		remain_budget -= rx_done;
> > +		goto poll_again;
> > +	}  
> 
> Could this be turned into a do while() loop?

Yes indeed, I'll fix this for v3

> > +static void ipqess_irq_enable(struct ipqess *ess)
> > +{
> > +	int i;
> > +
> > +	ipqess_w32(ess, IPQESS_REG_RX_ISR, 0xff);
> > +	ipqess_w32(ess, IPQESS_REG_TX_ISR, 0xffff);
> > +	for (i = 0; i < IPQESS_NETDEV_QUEUES; i++) {
> > +		ipqess_w32(ess,
> > IPQESS_REG_RX_INT_MASK_Q(ess->rx_ring[i].idx), 1);
> > +		ipqess_w32(ess,
> > IPQESS_REG_TX_INT_MASK_Q(ess->tx_ring[i].idx), 1);
> > +	}
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void ipqess_irq_disable(struct ipqess *ess)
> > +{
> > +	int i;
> > +
> > +	for (i = 0; i < IPQESS_NETDEV_QUEUES; i++) {
> > +		ipqess_w32(ess,
> > IPQESS_REG_RX_INT_MASK_Q(ess->rx_ring[i].idx), 0);
> > +		ipqess_w32(ess,
> > IPQESS_REG_TX_INT_MASK_Q(ess->tx_ring[i].idx), 0);
> > +	}
> > +}  
> 
> Enable and disable are not symmetric?

Ah nice catch too, I'll dig into this, either to make it symmetric or
to explain with a comment why it isn't

> 
> > +static inline void ipqess_kick_tx(struct ipqess_tx_ring *tx_ring)  
> 
> No inline functions please in .c files. Let the compiler decide.

Ack, I'll address that.

>    Andrew

Thanks again for the review

Maxime