devicetree.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Herve Codina <herve.codina@bootlin.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
	Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>,
	Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
	Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@microchip.com>,
	Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
	Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@microchip.com>,
	linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
	Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] dt-bindings: usb: atmel: Add Microchip LAN966x compatible string
Date: Fri, 20 May 2022 15:02:43 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220520150243.625723fa@bootlin.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <01b31a02-523e-10bf-3b46-5b830e456522@linaro.org>

On Fri, 20 May 2022 14:50:24 +0200
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> wrote:

> On 20/05/2022 14:21, Herve Codina wrote:
> >>> I think it makes sense to keep 'microchip,lan966x-udc' for the USB
> >>> device controller (same controller on LAN9662 and LAN9668) and so
> >>> keeping the same rules as for other common parts.    
> >>
> >> Having wildcard was rather a mistake and we already started correcting
> >> it, so keeping the "mistake" neither gives you consistency, nor
> >> correctness...
> >>  
> > 
> > I think that the "family" compatible should be present.
> > This one allows to define the common parts in the common
> > .dtsi file (lan966x.dtsi in our case).
> > 
> > What do you think about:
> > - microchip,lan9662-udc
> > - microchip,lan9668-udc
> > - microchip,lan966-udc  <-- Family
> > 
> > lan966 is defined as the family compatible string since (1) in
> > bindings/arm/atmel-at91.yaml and in Documentation/arm/microchip.rst
> >   
> 
> You can add some family compatible, if it makes sense. I don't get why
> do you mention it - we did not discuss family names, but using
> wildcards... Just please do not add wildcards.

Well, I mentioned it as I will only use the family compatible string
and not the SOC (lan9662 or lan9668) compatible string in lan966x.dtsi.
In this case, the family compatible string can be seen as a kind of
"wildcard".

Regards,
Hervé

-- 
Hervé Codina, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com

  reply	other threads:[~2022-05-20 13:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-13 10:58 [PATCH 0/3] Microchip LAN966x USB device support Herve Codina
2022-05-13 10:58 ` [PATCH 1/3] clk: lan966x: Fix the lan966x clock gate register address Herve Codina
2022-05-13 10:58 ` [PATCH 2/3] dt-bindings: usb: atmel: Add Microchip LAN966x compatible string Herve Codina
2022-05-13 12:57   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-05-20 11:34     ` Herve Codina
2022-05-20 11:40       ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-05-20 12:21         ` Herve Codina
2022-05-20 12:50           ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-05-20 13:02             ` Herve Codina [this message]
2022-05-20 13:38               ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-05-20 13:52                 ` Alexandre Belloni
2022-05-20 14:05                   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-05-20 14:12                   ` Herve Codina
2022-05-13 10:58 ` [PATCH 3/3] ARM: dts: lan966x: Add UDPHS support Herve Codina
2022-05-13 12:54   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-05-20 12:37     ` Herve Codina
2022-05-20 12:48       ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-05-14  9:35   ` Sergei Shtylyov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220520150243.625723fa@bootlin.com \
    --to=herve.codina@bootlin.com \
    --cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
    --cc=claudiu.beznea@microchip.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=horatiu.vultur@microchip.com \
    --cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
    --cc=krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
    --cc=nicolas.ferre@microchip.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
    --cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).