Re: [PATCH 3/5] proximity: vl53l0x: Handle the VDD regulator

[Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>]

On Tue, 14 Jun 2022 11:48:53 +0100
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org> wrote:

> On Sun, 12 Jun 2022 11:28:22 +0200
> Luca Weiss <luca@z3ntu.xyz> wrote:
> 
> > Hi Jonathan,
> > 
> > On Sonntag, 12. Juni 2022 10:53:33 CEST Jonathan Cameron wrote:  
> > > On Wed, 08 Jun 2022 12:18:52 +0200
> > > 
> > > "Luca Weiss" <luca.weiss@fairphone.com> wrote:    
> > > > Hi Markuss,
> > > > 
> > > > On Mon May 23, 2022 at 7:53 PM CEST, Markuss Broks wrote:    
> > > > > Handle the regulator supplying the VDD pin of VL53L0X.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Markuss Broks <markuss.broks@gmail.com>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > 
> > > > >  drivers/iio/proximity/vl53l0x-i2c.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > >  1 file changed, 37 insertions(+)
> > > > > 
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/iio/proximity/vl53l0x-i2c.c
> > > > > b/drivers/iio/proximity/vl53l0x-i2c.c index 12a3e2eff464..8581a873919f
> > > > > 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/iio/proximity/vl53l0x-i2c.c
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/iio/proximity/vl53l0x-i2c.c
> > > > > @@ -43,6 +43,7 @@
> > > > > 
> > > > >  struct vl53l0x_data {
> > > > >  
> > > > >  	struct i2c_client *client;
> > > > >  	struct completion completion;
> > > > > 
> > > > > +	struct regulator *vdd_supply;
> > > > > 
> > > > >  };
> > > > >  
> > > > >  static irqreturn_t vl53l0x_handle_irq(int irq, void *priv)
> > > > > 
> > > > > @@ -192,10 +193,31 @@ static const struct iio_info vl53l0x_info = {
> > > > > 
> > > > >  	.read_raw = vl53l0x_read_raw,
> > > > >  
> > > > >  };
> > > > > 
> > > > > +static void vl53l0x_power_off(void *_data)
> > > > > +{
> > > > > +	struct vl53l0x_data *data = _data;
> > > > > +
> > > > > +	regulator_disable(data->vdd_supply);
> > > > > +}
> > > > > +
> > > > > +static int vl53l0x_power_on(struct vl53l0x_data *data)
> > > > > +{
> > > > > +	int ret;
> > > > > +
> > > > > +	ret = regulator_enable(data->vdd_supply);
> > > > > +	if (ret)
> > > > > +		return ret;
> > > > > +
> > > > > +	usleep_range(3200, 5000);
> > > > > +
> > > > > +	return 0;
> > > > > +}
> > > > > +
> > > > > 
> > > > >  static int vl53l0x_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
> > > > >  {
> > > > >  
> > > > >  	struct vl53l0x_data *data;
> > > > >  	struct iio_dev *indio_dev;
> > > > > 
> > > > > +	int error;
> > > > > 
> > > > >  	indio_dev = devm_iio_device_alloc(&client->dev, sizeof(*data));
> > > > >  	if (!indio_dev)
> > > > > 
> > > > > @@ -210,6 +232,21 @@ static int vl53l0x_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
> > > > > 
> > > > >  				     I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_BYTE_DATA))
> > > > >  		
> > > > >  		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > > > > 
> > > > > +	data->vdd_supply = devm_regulator_get_optional(&client->dev,     
> > "vdd");  
> > > > > +	if (IS_ERR(data->vdd_supply))
> > > > > +		return dev_err_probe(&client->dev, PTR_ERR(data-    
> > >vdd_supply),    
> > > > > +				     "Unable to get VDD     
> > regulator\n");  
> > > > 
> > > > It looks like this optional regulator is not actually optional.
> > > > 
> > > > [    1.919995] vl53l0x-i2c 1-0029: error -ENODEV: Unable to get VDD
> > > > regulator
> > > > 
> > > > When using devm_regulator_get instead, a dummy regulator gets returned
> > > > which I think is what we want here:
> > > > 
> > > > [    1.905518] vl53l0x-i2c 1-0029: supply vdd not found, using dummy
> > > > regulator
> > > > 
> > > > Can you fix this up or should I send a patch?    
> > > 
> > > Hi Luca,
> > > 
> > > Please send a patch.    
> > 
> > Which commit sha can I use for Fixes: here?
> > Based your togreg[0] branch currently shows "Age: 20 hours" I guess it was 
> > rebased recently?  
> 
> It was rebased onto rc1 as you noticed.
> 
> In theory it is now stable, assuming nothing nasty shows up.
> Fixes tag doesn't matter strongly given both will go into mainline via
> the same pull request, so maybe just skip adding one to make my life
> easier :)
The 'in theory stable' bit lasted a few more mins as I had a patch
I'd otherwise needed to have done a messy revert for.

So definitely safer to skip the Fixes tag for this, though I do
have scripts that check them and should in theory fix it up
if it is based on stale version of togreg.  It's just fiddly
to do.

Thanks
Jonathan


> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jonathan
> 
> > 
> > Regards
> > Luca
> > 
> > [0]https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jic23/iio.git/log/?h=togreg
> >   
> > > 
> > > Jonathan
> > >     
> > > > Regards
> > > > Luca
> > > >     
> > > > > +
> > > > > +	error = vl53l0x_power_on(data);
> > > > > +	if (error)
> > > > > +		return dev_err_probe(&client->dev, error,
> > > > > +				     "Failed to power on the     
> > chip\n");  
> > > > > +
> > > > > +	error = devm_add_action_or_reset(&client->dev, vl53l0x_power_off,
> > > > > data);
> > > > > +	if (error)
> > > > > +		return dev_err_probe(&client->dev, error,
> > > > > +				     "Failed to install poweroff     
> > action\n");  
> > > > > +
> > > > > 
> > > > >  	indio_dev->name = "vl53l0x";
> > > > >  	indio_dev->info = &vl53l0x_info;
> > > > >  	indio_dev->channels = vl53l0x_channels;    
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >   
>