From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
To: Conor.Dooley@microchip.com
Cc: robh+dt@kernel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org,
paul.walmsley@sifive.com, palmer@dabbelt.com,
aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, Daire.McNamara@microchip.com,
niklas.cassel@wdc.com, damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com,
geert@linux-m68k.org, zong.li@sifive.com, kernel@esmil.dk,
hahnjo@hahnjo.de, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Brice.Goglin@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] RISC-V: Add cpu-map topology information nodes
Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2022 11:03:33 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220706100333.7n35rfnbdrnz6mh5@bogus> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9f26cd2a-b389-3f4b-b7d2-06fa5c2d7016@microchip.com>
On Wed, Jul 06, 2022 at 09:43:02AM +0000, Conor.Dooley@microchip.com wrote:
>
>
> On 06/07/2022 10:21, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 05, 2022 at 11:03:54PM +0000, Conor.Dooley@microchip.com wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On 05/07/2022 21:33, Conor.Dooley@microchip.com wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 05/07/2022 21:19, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> >>>> On Tue, Jul 05, 2022 at 08:04:31PM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
> >>>>> From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> It was reported to me that the Hive Unmatched incorrectly reports
> >>>>> its topology to hwloc, but the StarFive VisionFive did in [0] &
> >>>>> a subsequent off-list email from Brice (the hwloc maintainer).
> >>>>> This turned out not to be entirely true, the /downstream/ version
> >>>>> of the VisionFive does work correctly but not upstream, as the
> >>>>> downstream devicetree has a cpu-map node that was added recently.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> This series adds a cpu-map node to all upstream devicetrees, which
> >>>>> I have tested on mpfs & fu540. The first patch is lifted directly
> >>>>> from the downstream StarFive devicetree.
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
> >>>>
> >>>> I would recommend to have sane defaults in core risc-v code in case of
> >>>> absence of /cpu-map node as it is optional. The reason I mentioned is that
> >>>> Conor mentioned how the default values in absence of the node looked quite
> >>>> wrong. I don't know if it is possible on RISC-V but on ARM64 we do have
> >>>> default values if arch_topology fails to set based on DT/ACPI.
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> Yeah the defaults are all -1. I'll add some sane defaults for a v2.
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Conor.
> >>
> >> I shamelessly stole from arm64... Seems to work, but have done minimal
> >> testing (only PolarFire SoC).
> >>
> >> Author: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
> >> Date: Wed Jul 6 00:00:34 2022 +0100
> >>
> >> riscv: arch-topology: add sane defaults
> >>
> >> RISC-V has no sane defaults to fall back on where there is no cpu-map
> >> in the devicetree. Add sane defaults in ~the exact same way as ARM64.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
> >>
> >> diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/topology.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/topology.h
> >> new file mode 100644
> >> index 000000000000..71c80710f00e
> >> --- /dev/null
> >> +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/topology.h
> >> @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
> >> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
> >> +/*
> >> + * Copyright (c) 2022 Microchip Technology Inc. and its subsidiaries
> >> + */
> >> +
> >> +#ifndef _ASM_RISCV_TOPOLOGY_H
> >> +#define _ASM_RISCV_TOPOLOGY_H
> >> +
> >> +#include <asm-generic/topology.h>
> >> +
> >> +void store_cpu_topology(unsigned int cpuid);
> >> +
> >> +#endif /* _ASM_RISCV_TOPOLOGY_H */
> >> \ No newline at end of file
> >> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/Makefile b/arch/riscv/kernel/Makefile
> >> index c71d6591d539..9518882ba6f9 100644
> >> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/Makefile
> >> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/Makefile
> >> @@ -50,6 +50,7 @@ obj-y += riscv_ksyms.o
> >> obj-y += stacktrace.o
> >> obj-y += cacheinfo.o
> >> obj-y += patch.o
> >> +obj-y += topology.o
> >> obj-y += probes/
> >> obj-$(CONFIG_MMU) += vdso.o vdso/
> >>
> >> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/smpboot.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/smpboot.c
> >> index f1e4948a4b52..d551c7f452d4 100644
> >> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/smpboot.c
> >> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/smpboot.c
> >> @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@
> >> #include <asm/sections.h>
> >> #include <asm/sbi.h>
> >> #include <asm/smp.h>
> >> +#include <asm/topology.h>
> >>
> >> #include "head.h"
> >>
> >> @@ -40,6 +41,8 @@ static DECLARE_COMPLETION(cpu_running);
> >> void __init smp_prepare_boot_cpu(void)
> >> {
> >> init_cpu_topology();
> >> +
> >> + store_cpu_topology(smp_processor_id());
> >> }
> >>
> >> void __init smp_prepare_cpus(unsigned int max_cpus)
> >> @@ -161,6 +164,7 @@ asmlinkage __visible void smp_callin(void)
> >> mmgrab(mm);
> >> current->active_mm = mm;
> >>
> >> + store_cpu_topology(curr_cpuid);
> >> notify_cpu_starting(curr_cpuid);
> >> numa_add_cpu(curr_cpuid);
> >> update_siblings_masks(curr_cpuid);
> >> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/topology.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/topology.c
> >> new file mode 100644
> >> index 000000000000..799b3423e0bc
> >> --- /dev/null
> >> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/topology.c
> >> @@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
> >> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> >> +/*
> >> + * Based on the arm64 version, which was in turn based on arm32, which was
> >> + * ultimately based on sh's.
> >> + * The arm64 version was listed as:
> >> + * Copyright (C) 2011,2013,2014 Linaro Limited.
> >> + *
> >> + */
> >> +#include <linux/arch_topology.h>
> >> +#include <linux/topology.h>
> >> +#include <asm/topology.h>
> >> +
> >> +void store_cpu_topology(unsigned int cpuid)
> >> +{
> >> + struct cpu_topology *cpuid_topo = &cpu_topology[cpuid];
> >> +
> >> + if (cpuid_topo->package_id != -1)
> >> + goto topology_populated;
> >> +
> >> + cpuid_topo->thread_id = -1;
> >> + cpuid_topo->core_id = cpuid;
> >> + cpuid_topo->package_id = cpu_to_node(cpuid);
> >> +
> >> + pr_info("CPU%u: cluster %d core %d thread %d\n",
> >> + cpuid, cpuid_topo->package_id, cpuid_topo->core_id,
> >> + cpuid_topo->thread_id);
> >> +
> >> +topology_populated:
> >> + update_siblings_masks(cpuid);
> >> +}
> >>
> >
> > Looks good. Again package id is not cluster. This is what my series is
> > addressing. So update the log as Package instead of Cluster above. The
> > cluster id will be -1 unless you can get that for DT.
>
>
> Cool, I'll respin a v2 without this included then & get the series
> backported since this is user visible & will fix all existing supported
> platforms.
>
The DT /cpu-map is optional, so I don't think it needs to be backported.
>
> I'll send the topology code changes separately to avoid it going
> forwards.
This on the other hand can be backported to fix userspace.
--
Regards,
Sudeep
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-07-06 10:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-07-05 19:04 [PATCH 0/5] RISC-V: Add cpu-map topology information nodes Conor Dooley
2022-07-05 19:04 ` [PATCH 1/5] riscv: dts: starfive: Add JH7100 CPU topology Conor Dooley
2022-07-05 19:04 ` [PATCH 2/5] riscv: dts: sifive: Add fu540 topology information Conor Dooley
2022-07-05 19:04 ` [PATCH 3/5] riscv: dts: sifive: Add fu740 " Conor Dooley
2022-07-05 19:04 ` [PATCH 4/5] riscv: dts: microchip: Add mpfs' " Conor Dooley
2022-07-14 22:04 ` Palmer Dabbelt
2022-07-05 19:04 ` [PATCH 5/5] riscv: dts: canaan: Add k210 " Conor Dooley
2022-07-06 3:49 ` Damien Le Moal
2022-07-05 20:19 ` [PATCH 0/5] RISC-V: Add cpu-map topology information nodes Sudeep Holla
2022-07-05 20:33 ` Conor.Dooley
2022-07-05 23:03 ` Conor.Dooley
2022-07-06 9:21 ` Sudeep Holla
2022-07-06 9:43 ` Conor.Dooley
2022-07-06 10:03 ` Sudeep Holla [this message]
2022-07-06 10:11 ` Conor.Dooley
2022-07-06 13:04 ` Conor.Dooley
2022-07-06 14:00 ` Sudeep Holla
2022-07-06 9:18 ` Sudeep Holla
2022-07-07 22:29 ` (subset) " Conor Dooley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220706100333.7n35rfnbdrnz6mh5@bogus \
--to=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=Brice.Goglin@inria.fr \
--cc=Conor.Dooley@microchip.com \
--cc=Daire.McNamara@microchip.com \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=hahnjo@hahnjo.de \
--cc=kernel@esmil.dk \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=niklas.cassel@wdc.com \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=zong.li@sifive.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox