devicetree.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
To: Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@gmail.com>
Cc: Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
	Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
	Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@somainline.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
	Steev Klimaszewski <steev@kali.org>,
	Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>,
	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
	Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] firmware: Add support for Qualcomm UEFI Secure Application
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2022 13:27:05 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220725192705.GA2536409-robh@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220723224949.1089973-1-luzmaximilian@gmail.com>

On Sun, Jul 24, 2022 at 12:49:45AM +0200, Maximilian Luz wrote:
> On modern Qualcomm platforms, access to EFI variables is restricted to
> the secure world / TrustZone, i.e. the Trusted Execution Environment
> (TrEE or TEE) as Qualcomm seems to call it. To access EFI variables, we
> therefore need to talk to the UEFI Secure Application (uefisecapp),
> residing in the TrEE.

The whole point of UEFI is providing a standard interface. Why can't the 
UEFI implementation call the TEE itself?

I'm not sure custom interfaces is something we want.


> This series adds support for accessing EFI variables on those platforms.
> 
> To do this, we first need to add some SCM call functions used to manage
> and talk to Secure Applications. A very small subset of this interface
> is added in the second patch (whereas the first one exports the required
> functions for that). Interface specifications are extracted from [1].
> While this does not (yet) support re-entrant SCM calls (including
> callbacks and listeners), this is enough to talk to the aforementioned
> uefisecapp on a couple of platforms (I've tested this on a Surface Pro X
> and heard reports from Lenovo Flex 5G, Lenovo Thinkpad x13s, and Lenovo
> Yoga C630 devices).

What does Windows do on these devices? I'm surprised something like this 
would fly with Microsoft.

Rob

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-07-25 19:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-07-23 22:49 [PATCH 0/4] firmware: Add support for Qualcomm UEFI Secure Application Maximilian Luz
2022-07-23 22:49 ` [PATCH 1/4] firmware: qcom_scm: Export SCM call functions Maximilian Luz
2022-07-23 22:49 ` [PATCH 2/4] firmware: Add support for Qualcomm Trusted Execution Environment SCM calls Maximilian Luz
2022-07-23 22:49 ` [PATCH 3/4] firmware: Add support for Qualcomm UEFI Secure Application Maximilian Luz
2023-01-17  8:24   ` Johan Hovold
2023-01-17  8:42     ` Maximilian Luz
2023-01-18 20:45     ` Maximilian Luz
2023-01-19 16:47       ` Johan Hovold
2023-01-19 17:19         ` Maximilian Luz
2023-01-17 11:05   ` Johan Hovold
2023-01-17 12:07     ` Maximilian Luz
2022-07-23 22:49 ` [PATCH 4/4] dt-bindings: firmware: Add Qualcomm UEFI Secure Application client Maximilian Luz
2022-07-25  1:06   ` Rob Herring
2022-07-26 10:17   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-07-26 11:15     ` Maximilian Luz
2022-07-26 13:25       ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-07-26 15:00         ` Maximilian Luz
2022-07-27 11:24           ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-07-27 13:00             ` Maximilian Luz
2022-07-28  7:48               ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-07-28 10:25                 ` Maximilian Luz
2022-07-28 10:38                   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-07-28 10:49                     ` Maximilian Luz
2022-07-26 14:30   ` Sudeep Holla
2022-07-26 15:15     ` Maximilian Luz
2022-07-26 15:41       ` Sudeep Holla
2022-07-26 17:01         ` Maximilian Luz
2022-07-27 11:38           ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-07-27 13:03             ` Maximilian Luz
2022-07-27 13:24               ` Sudeep Holla
2022-07-27 14:49                 ` Maximilian Luz
2022-07-28  6:03                 ` Ilias Apalodimas
2022-07-28 10:48                   ` Maximilian Luz
2022-07-28 11:33                     ` Sudeep Holla
2022-07-28 12:13                       ` Maximilian Luz
2022-07-28 12:24                       ` Ilias Apalodimas
2022-07-28 15:05                       ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-07-28 15:16                         ` Ilias Apalodimas
2022-07-28 16:16                         ` Sudeep Holla
2022-07-28 16:24                           ` Konrad Dybcio
2022-07-28 12:35                     ` Ilias Apalodimas
2022-07-28 12:49                       ` Maximilian Luz
2022-07-28 16:56                         ` Ilias Apalodimas
2022-07-28 17:27                           ` Maximilian Luz
2022-07-29  8:52                             ` Sudeep Holla
2022-07-29 15:11                               ` Maximilian Luz
2022-07-31  9:54                             ` Ilias Apalodimas
2022-07-31 22:48                               ` Maximilian Luz
2022-07-28  8:23           ` Sudeep Holla
2022-07-28 10:05             ` Maximilian Luz
2022-07-28 11:21               ` Sudeep Holla
2022-07-28 11:45                 ` Maximilian Luz
2022-07-28 13:42                   ` Sudeep Holla
2022-07-28 14:09                     ` Maximilian Luz
2022-07-25 19:27 ` Rob Herring [this message]
2022-07-25 20:16   ` [PATCH 0/4] firmware: Add support for Qualcomm UEFI Secure Application Maximilian Luz
2022-08-02 11:51 ` Srinivas Kandagatla
2022-08-02 13:22   ` Maximilian Luz
2022-08-02 14:02     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-08-02 19:11       ` Maximilian Luz
2022-09-02  7:26     ` Sumit Garg
2022-09-02 13:18       ` Maximilian Luz
2022-09-05  6:50         ` Sumit Garg
2022-11-23 11:22     ` Srinivas Kandagatla
2022-11-23 12:05       ` Maximilian Luz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220725192705.GA2536409-robh@kernel.org \
    --to=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=agross@kernel.org \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
    --cc=cristian.marussi@arm.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=konrad.dybcio@somainline.org \
    --cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luzmaximilian@gmail.com \
    --cc=shawn.guo@linaro.org \
    --cc=steev@kali.org \
    --cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).