devicetree.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marek Bykowski <marek.bykowski@gmail.com>
To: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
Cc: Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] of/fdt: Don't calculate initrd_start from the DT if 'linux,initrd-end' is 0
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2022 15:35:00 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220830153500.49206b5a@ubuntu.armcompdev.pub.tds.tieto.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAL_JsqKGgZOSdWQ2ithipvrRAYwt-vOL1z9-RM++-_h6pA=C_Q@mail.gmail.com>

On Sun, 28 Aug 2022 20:12:41 -0500
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org> wrote:

> 
> Shouldn't we just check that start < end?
> 
> Can we check this somewhere not DT specific (and also not arch
> specific)? Then we don't have to worry if any other method of setting
> initrd could have the same error.

Yes, we can switch from checking on the end being 0 to that proposed:
- if (!end)
-     return;
+ if (start >= end)
+     return;

Then the check would even go further as would also catch cases where
end < start.

My taking is early_init_dt_scan_chosen() that sets initrd size
incorrectly is DT specific but generic/arch agnostic. So that if
the error got introduced by a bootloader/U-Boot through the DT
chosen node, we should catch it in DT and react.

ARM64, for example, before going down for mapping for the incorrect
address (some extra large address resulting from the negative to
positive value conversion), has a check after DT parsing if
phys_initrd_size is other than 0 to proceed, and it is so that it
passes or in other words it doesn't catch the error.

Marek

  reply	other threads:[~2022-08-30 15:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-08-26 22:00 [PATCH] of/fdt: Don't calculate initrd_start from the DT if 'linux,initrd-end' is 0 Marek Bykowski
2022-08-29  1:12 ` Rob Herring
2022-08-30 15:35   ` Marek Bykowski [this message]
2022-09-06 10:07     ` Marek Bykowski
2022-09-06 14:39     ` Rob Herring

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220830153500.49206b5a@ubuntu.armcompdev.pub.tds.tieto.com \
    --to=marek.bykowski@gmail.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=frowand.list@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).