From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F578C32771 for ; Mon, 26 Sep 2022 16:24:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233578AbiIZQYf (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Sep 2022 12:24:35 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:38722 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S235639AbiIZQYM (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Sep 2022 12:24:12 -0400 Received: from mail-oa1-f44.google.com (mail-oa1-f44.google.com [209.85.160.44]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 583A06B8F8; Mon, 26 Sep 2022 08:13:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-oa1-f44.google.com with SMTP id 586e51a60fabf-127dca21a7dso9583793fac.12; Mon, 26 Sep 2022 08:13:04 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=N5zD8itGsjXgN7u5GbMQZZht7UZJCrojZyw1yQR9ywk=; b=wDFTKBG6q+2eac+VlhaX4M6N5IxXQ6aEQrxHcXSsCh7PrcZb1tH8bRTGgie+cvEHWe Az82WmMT6zYu489KS7Dv+OWjyzF8SWf6mHfalbaF7qnemetfyqfSyts1nwPkVyBt1QoH ICro/NCZwIuAjjKCZLM4FL2f7f2NdQYivlr5/gcn4xCJZWKgQxyo+ddKC+wgmlH1CP/L qvw/1qhkzvQ3M0o46chFBBeXty/4n0hfEuwQ3jRr7L5WjdbSfXSdNtTwZHdi4V/NXTz1 lIwwJmK6fBIAn6M8gTQI8jDp/pfSZw11FwZ2nT4TnrinknVsCFy95cmTPtjK9H3bX6V/ xJEw== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf1PBSXv6xn3MY5NapH4wNx1ts8neJocmmzbzKOtxaIcjS6Pa7dW avk0ntaQk21XxzBHmoJ7gA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM4o9ytcOGwlT69mDGuQ5FCedY8pZACfPmctgBWZL50ej+sPLaNEuq93Q1Vl05KIUqsS8B5VBw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6870:828f:b0:126:19ae:68d9 with SMTP id q15-20020a056870828f00b0012619ae68d9mr19095618oae.116.1664205183361; Mon, 26 Sep 2022 08:13:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from robh.at.kernel.org (66-90-144-107.dyn.grandenetworks.net. [66.90.144.107]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l25-20020a9d6a99000000b0063695ad0cbesm7961315otq.66.2022.09.26.08.13.02 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 26 Sep 2022 08:13:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: (nullmailer pid 1929738 invoked by uid 1000); Mon, 26 Sep 2022 15:13:02 -0000 Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2022 10:13:02 -0500 From: Rob Herring To: Krzysztof Kozlowski Cc: Bjorn Andersson , Bjorn Andersson , Rob Clark , Abhinav Kumar , Dmitry Baryshkov , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Stephen Boyd , Kuogee Hsieh , Sankeerth Billakanti , linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] dt-bindings: msm/dp: Add SDM845 and SC8280XP compatibles Message-ID: <20220926151302.GA1880039-robh@kernel.org> References: <20220916200028.25009-1-quic_bjorande@quicinc.com> <20220916200028.25009-2-quic_bjorande@quicinc.com> <1641e41c-08c7-859b-644a-28d966fb00f3@linaro.org> <20220919211832.6b3buqxrnfp6yjjg@builder.lan> <6b242b44-b657-c7a6-63ca-465c7031376f@linaro.org> <20220922001429.zqfap3clprvlo6jo@builder.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 05:37:39PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 22/09/2022 02:14, Bjorn Andersson wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 20, 2022 at 09:09:13AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > >> On 19/09/2022 23:18, Bjorn Andersson wrote: > >>> On Sat, Sep 17, 2022 at 06:03:27PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > >>>> On 16/09/2022 21:00, Bjorn Andersson wrote: > >>>>> From: Bjorn Andersson > >>>>> > >>>>> Add compatibles for the DisplayPort and Embedded DisplayPort blocks in > >>>>> Qualcomm SDM845 and SC8280XP platforms. > >>>>> > >>>>> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson > >>>>> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson > >>>> > >>>> No need for quicinc SoB (unless you also take ownership). > >>>> > >>> > >>> It's my understanding that both needs to be there. Bjorn @ Linaro > >>> authored the patch and the author must certify its origin, but as the > >>> submitter I must certify its origin. > >> > >> It's the same person. There are no two Bjorns (unless there are :) ), so > >> you certify with old email. SoB chain is coming from people, not email > >> addresses. > >> > > > > IANAL, but I don't think it's the same person. I can't use my old > > signature to certify the origin in a contribution today and I can't > > claim authorship of something Linaro did. > > Fine with me. > > > > >> And it is not only my understanding of SoB chain. > >> https://lore.kernel.org/all/YuKcBO5JatwRYQJ3@kroah.com/ > >> > > > > Again, IANAL, but I think the situation is different given AMD and > > Xilinx relationship. > > Hm, I am not sure how it is different. We might know or we might know > the change of ownership. Maybe the change of owner came with copyrights, > maybe not (someone else bought them). I don't know, there can be many > cases here. I interpret Greg's point there as in SoB statement - the > person, not email address, certifies. If Bjorn owned the copyright, then yeah, 1 email would be enough. But Linaro owned the copyright so it should be there. Rob