From: Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@gmail.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: "Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
"Marek Szyprowski" <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
"Robin Murphy" <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
"William McVicker" <willmcvicker@google.com>,
"Serge Semin" <Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru>,
"Rob Herring" <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
"Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
"Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
"Jingoo Han" <jingoohan1@gmail.com>,
"Gustavo Pimentel" <gustavo.pimentel@synopsys.com>,
"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kw@linux.com>,
"Alexey Malahov" <Alexey.Malahov@baikalelectronics.ru>,
"Pavel Parkhomenko" <Pavel.Parkhomenko@baikalelectronics.ru>,
"Frank Li" <Frank.Li@nxp.com>,
"Manivannan Sadhasivam" <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 20/20] PCI: dwc: Add Baikal-T1 PCIe controller support
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2022 23:53:33 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220926205333.qlhb5ojmx4sktzt5@mobilestation> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220926143127.GB19031@lst.de>
On Mon, Sep 26, 2022 at 04:31:28PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2022 at 03:49:24PM +0300, Serge Semin wrote:
> > @Christoph, @Marek, @Bjorn, @Rob could you please join to the
> > DMA-mask related discussion. @Lorenzo can't decide which driver should
> > initialize the device DMA-mask.
>
> The driver that does the actual DMA mapping or allocation functions
> need to set it. But even with your comments on the questions I'm
> still confused what struct device you are even talking about. Can
> you explain this a bit better?
We are talking about the DW PCIe Root Port controller with DW eDMA engine
embedded. It' simplified structure can be represented as follows:
+---------------+ +--------+
| System memory | | CPU(s) |
+---------------+ +--------+
^ | | ^
| ... System bus ... |
... | | ...
| v v |
+------------+------+--------+----------+------+
| DW PCIe RP | AXI-m| | AXI-s/DBI| |
| +------+ +----------+ |
| ^ ^ | |
| +------+----+ | CSRs |
| v v v |
| +-------+ +---------+ +----------+ |
| | eDMA | | in-iATU | | out-iATU | |
| +-------+ +---------+ +----------+ |
| ^ ^ ^ |
| +--------+--+---+-------+ |
+------------------| PIPE |--------------------+
+------+
| ^
v |
PCIe bus
The DW PCIe controller device is instantiated as a platform device
defined in the system DT source file. The device is probed by the
DW PCIe low-level driver, which after the platform-specific setups
initiates the generic DW PCIe host-controller registration. On the way
of that procedure the DW PCIe core tries to auto-detect the DW eDMA
engine availability. If the engine is found, the DW eDMA probe method
is called in order to register the DMA-engine device. After that the
PCIe host bridge is registered. Both the PCIe host-bridge and
DMA-engine devices will have the DW PCIe platform device as parent.
Getting back to the sketch above. Here is a short description of the
content:
1. DW eDMA is capable of performing the data transfers from/to System
memory to/from PCIe bus memory.
2. in-iATU is the Inbound Address Translation Unit, which is
responsible for the PCIe bus peripheral devices to access the system
memory. The "dma-ranges" DT-property is used to initialize the
PCIe<->Sys memory mapping. (@William note the In-iATU setup doesn't
affect the eDMA transfers.)
3. out-iATU is responsible for the CPU(s) to access the PCIe bus
peripheral devices memory/cfg-space.
So eDMA and in-iATU are using the same AXI-master interface to access
the system memory. Thus the DMAable memory capability is the same for
both of them (Though in-iATU may have some specific mapping based on
the "dma-ranges" DT-property setup). Neither DW eDMA nor DW PCIe Root
Port CSRs region have any register to auto-detect the AXI-m interface
address bus width. It's selected during the IP-core synthesize and is
platform-specific. The question is: "What driver/code is supposed to
set the DMA-mask of the DW PCIe platform device?" Seeing the parental
platform device is used to perform the memory-mapping for both DW eDMA
clients and PCIe-bus peripheral device drivers, and seeing the AXI-m
interface parameters aren't auto-detectable and are platform-specific,
the only place it should be done in is the DW PCIe low-level device
driver. I don't really see any alternative... What is your opinion?
-Sergey
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-26 20:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-22 18:46 [PATCH v5 00/20] PCI: dwc: Add generic resources and Baikal-T1 support Serge Semin
2022-08-22 18:46 ` [PATCH v5 01/20] dt-bindings: imx6q-pcie: Fix clock names for imx6sx and imx8mq Serge Semin
2022-08-22 21:57 ` Rob Herring
[not found] ` <8354660.EvYhyI6sBW@steina-w>
2022-08-25 13:01 ` Serge Semin
2022-08-22 18:46 ` [PATCH v5 02/20] dt-bindings: visconti-pcie: Fix interrupts array max constraints Serge Semin
2022-08-30 21:33 ` Rob Herring
2022-09-01 23:33 ` nobuhiro1.iwamatsu
2022-08-22 18:46 ` [PATCH v5 03/20] dt-bindings: PCI: dwc: Detach common RP/EP DT bindings Serge Semin
2022-08-22 18:46 ` [PATCH v5 04/20] dt-bindings: PCI: dwc: Remove bus node from the examples Serge Semin
2022-08-22 18:46 ` [PATCH v5 05/20] dt-bindings: PCI: dwc: Add phys/phy-names common properties Serge Semin
2022-08-22 21:57 ` Rob Herring
2022-08-25 15:13 ` Serge Semin
2022-08-22 18:46 ` [PATCH v5 06/20] dt-bindings: PCI: dwc: Add max-link-speed common property Serge Semin
2022-08-22 18:46 ` [PATCH v5 07/20] dt-bindings: PCI: dwc: Apply generic schema for generic device only Serge Semin
2022-08-31 21:18 ` Rob Herring
2022-08-22 18:46 ` [PATCH v5 08/20] dt-bindings: PCI: dwc: Add max-functions EP property Serge Semin
2022-08-22 18:46 ` [PATCH v5 09/20] dt-bindings: PCI: dwc: Add interrupts/interrupt-names common properties Serge Semin
2022-08-31 21:24 ` Rob Herring
2022-09-11 19:02 ` Serge Semin
2022-09-25 22:14 ` Serge Semin
2022-08-22 18:46 ` [PATCH v5 10/20] dt-bindings: PCI: dwc: Add reg/reg-names " Serge Semin
2022-08-22 18:46 ` [PATCH v5 11/20] dt-bindings: PCI: dwc: Add clocks/resets " Serge Semin
2022-08-22 18:46 ` [PATCH v5 12/20] dt-bindings: PCI: dwc: Add dma-coherent property Serge Semin
2022-08-31 21:25 ` Rob Herring
2022-08-22 18:46 ` [PATCH v5 13/20] dt-bindings: PCI: dwc: Apply common schema to Rockchip DW PCIe nodes Serge Semin
2022-08-31 21:26 ` Rob Herring
2022-09-11 19:09 ` Serge Semin
2022-08-22 18:46 ` [PATCH v5 14/20] dt-bindings: PCI: dwc: Add Baikal-T1 PCIe Root Port bindings Serge Semin
2022-08-31 21:28 ` Rob Herring
2022-08-22 18:46 ` [PATCH v5 15/20] PCI: dwc: Introduce dma-ranges property support for RC-host Serge Semin
2022-08-22 18:46 ` [PATCH v5 16/20] PCI: dwc: Introduce generic controller capabilities interface Serge Semin
2022-08-22 18:46 ` [PATCH v5 17/20] PCI: dwc: Introduce generic resources getter Serge Semin
2022-08-23 2:07 ` kernel test robot
2022-08-23 6:30 ` kernel test robot
2022-08-22 18:46 ` [PATCH v5 18/20] PCI: dwc: Combine iATU detection procedures Serge Semin
2022-08-22 18:47 ` [PATCH v5 19/20] PCI: dwc: Introduce generic platform clocks and resets Serge Semin
2022-08-22 18:47 ` [PATCH v5 20/20] PCI: dwc: Add Baikal-T1 PCIe controller support Serge Semin
2022-08-29 15:28 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2022-08-29 17:32 ` William McVicker
2022-09-12 0:20 ` Serge Semin
2022-08-31 8:36 ` Robin Murphy
2022-08-31 8:54 ` Robin Murphy
2022-09-12 0:25 ` Serge Semin
2022-09-26 13:09 ` Robin Murphy
2022-09-26 13:31 ` Serge Semin
2022-09-12 0:22 ` Serge Semin
2022-09-12 0:02 ` Serge Semin
2022-09-17 10:44 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2022-09-26 10:17 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2022-09-26 12:49 ` Serge Semin
2022-09-26 14:31 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-09-26 20:53 ` Serge Semin [this message]
2022-09-26 23:08 ` William McVicker
2022-09-28 10:36 ` Serge Semin
2022-09-28 17:59 ` William McVicker
2022-08-29 10:09 ` [PATCH v5 00/20] PCI: dwc: Add generic resources and Baikal-T1 support Lorenzo Pieralisi
2022-09-11 19:14 ` Serge Semin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220926205333.qlhb5ojmx4sktzt5@mobilestation \
--to=fancer.lancer@gmail.com \
--cc=Alexey.Malahov@baikalelectronics.ru \
--cc=Frank.Li@nxp.com \
--cc=Pavel.Parkhomenko@baikalelectronics.ru \
--cc=Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gustavo.pimentel@synopsys.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jingoohan1@gmail.com \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
--cc=kw@linux.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=willmcvicker@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox