From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
To: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@somainline.org>,
Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>
Cc: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>,
Sai Prakash Ranjan <quic_saipraka@quicinc.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux.dev,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH 0/9] iommy/arm-smmu-qcom: Rework Qualcomm SMMU bindings and implementation
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2022 19:55:25 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221021165534.2334329-1-dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org> (raw)
The main goal of this patchset is to define a generic qcom,smmu-500
binding to be used by newer Qualcomm platforms instead of defining each
and every SoC line with no actual differences between the compats.
While preparing this change it was required to cleanup the existing
bindings and to rework the way the arm-smmu-qcom implementation handles
binding to IOMMU devices.
Dmitry Baryshkov (9):
dt-bindings: arm-smmu: Add missing Qualcomm SMMU compatibles
dt-bindings: arm-smmu: fix clocks/clock-names schema
dt-bindings: arm-smmu: Add generic qcom,smmu-500 bindings
iommu/arm-smmu-qcom: Move implementation data into match data
iommu/arm-smmu-qcom: Move the qcom,adreno-smmu check into
qcom_smmu_create
iommu/arm-smmu-qcom: provide separate implementation for
SDM845-smmu-500
iommu/arm-smmu-qcom: Merge table from arm-smmu-qcom-debug into match
data
iommu/arm-smmu-qcom: Stop using mmu500 reset for v2 MMUs
iommu/arm-smmu-qcom: Add generic qcom,smmu-500 match entry
.../devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.yaml | 168 +++++++++++++++++-
.../iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom-debug.c | 91 ----------
drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c | 156 +++++++++++-----
drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.h | 21 ++-
4 files changed, 288 insertions(+), 148 deletions(-)
--
2.35.1
next reply other threads:[~2022-10-21 16:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-21 16:55 Dmitry Baryshkov [this message]
2022-10-21 16:55 ` [RFC PATCH 1/9] dt-bindings: arm-smmu: Add missing Qualcomm SMMU compatibles Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-10-22 0:59 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-10-22 9:17 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-10-22 15:42 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-10-22 15:43 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-10-21 16:55 ` [RFC PATCH 2/9] dt-bindings: arm-smmu: fix clocks/clock-names schema Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-10-21 21:00 ` Rob Herring
2022-10-21 16:55 ` [RFC PATCH 3/9] dt-bindings: arm-smmu: Add generic qcom,smmu-500 bindings Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-10-22 15:45 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-10-21 16:55 ` [RFC PATCH 4/9] iommu/arm-smmu-qcom: Move implementation data into match data Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-10-27 3:10 ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
2022-10-21 16:55 ` [RFC PATCH 5/9] iommu/arm-smmu-qcom: Move the qcom,adreno-smmu check into qcom_smmu_create Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-10-27 3:11 ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
2022-10-21 16:55 ` [RFC PATCH 6/9] iommu/arm-smmu-qcom: provide separate implementation for SDM845-smmu-500 Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-10-27 3:12 ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
2022-10-21 16:55 ` [RFC PATCH 7/9] iommu/arm-smmu-qcom: Merge table from arm-smmu-qcom-debug into match data Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-10-27 3:08 ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
2022-10-21 16:55 ` [RFC PATCH 8/9] iommu/arm-smmu-qcom: Stop using mmu500 reset for v2 MMUs Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-10-27 3:13 ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
2022-10-21 16:55 ` [RFC PATCH 9/9] iommu/arm-smmu-qcom: Add generic qcom,smmu-500 match entry Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-10-27 3:12 ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221021165534.2334329-1-dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org \
--to=dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org \
--cc=andersson@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=konrad.dybcio@somainline.org \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=quic_saipraka@quicinc.com \
--cc=robdclark@gmail.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).