From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
To: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@somainline.org>,
Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>
Cc: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>,
Sai Prakash Ranjan <quic_saipraka@quicinc.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux.dev,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH 5/9] iommu/arm-smmu-qcom: Move the qcom,adreno-smmu check into qcom_smmu_create
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2022 19:55:30 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221021165534.2334329-6-dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221021165534.2334329-1-dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
Move special handling of qcom,adreno-smmu into qcom_smmu_create()
function. This allows us to further customize the Adreno SMMU
implementation.
Note, this also adds two entries to the qcom_smmu_impl_of_match table.
They were used with the qcom,adreno-smmu compat and were handled by the
removed clause.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
---
drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c | 32 ++++++++++++----------
drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.h | 1 +
2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
index bd228b7d6817..c3bcd6eb2f42 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
@@ -407,13 +407,18 @@ static const struct arm_smmu_impl qcom_adreno_smmu_impl = {
static struct arm_smmu_device *qcom_smmu_create(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu,
const struct qcom_smmu_match_data *data)
{
+ const struct device_node *np = smmu->dev->of_node;
const struct arm_smmu_impl *impl;
struct qcom_smmu *qsmmu;
if (!data)
return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
- impl = data->impl;
+ if (np && of_device_is_compatible(np, "qcom,adreno-smmu"))
+ impl = data->adreno_impl;
+ else
+ impl = data->impl;
+
if (!impl)
return smmu;
@@ -431,15 +436,22 @@ static struct arm_smmu_device *qcom_smmu_create(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu,
return &qsmmu->smmu;
}
-static const struct qcom_smmu_match_data qcom_smmu_data = {
- .impl = &qcom_smmu_impl,
+/*
+ * It is not yet possible to use MDP SMMU with the bypass quirk on the msm8996,
+ * there are not enough context banks.
+ */
+static const struct qcom_smmu_match_data msm8996_smmu_data = {
+ .impl = NULL,
+ .adreno_impl = &qcom_adreno_smmu_impl,
};
-static const struct qcom_smmu_match_data qcom_adreno_smmu_data = {
- .impl = &qcom_adreno_smmu_impl,
+static const struct qcom_smmu_match_data qcom_smmu_data = {
+ .impl = &qcom_smmu_impl,
+ .adreno_impl = &qcom_adreno_smmu_impl,
};
static const struct of_device_id __maybe_unused qcom_smmu_impl_of_match[] = {
+ { .compatible = "qcom,msm8996-smmu-v2", .data = &msm8996_smmu_data },
{ .compatible = "qcom,msm8998-smmu-v2", .data = &qcom_smmu_data },
{ .compatible = "qcom,qcm2290-smmu-500", .data = &qcom_smmu_data },
{ .compatible = "qcom,sc7180-smmu-500", .data = &qcom_smmu_data },
@@ -447,6 +459,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id __maybe_unused qcom_smmu_impl_of_match[] = {
{ .compatible = "qcom,sc8180x-smmu-500", .data = &qcom_smmu_data },
{ .compatible = "qcom,sc8280xp-smmu-500", .data = &qcom_smmu_data },
{ .compatible = "qcom,sdm630-smmu-v2", .data = &qcom_smmu_data },
+ { .compatible = "qcom,sdm845-smmu-v2", .data = &qcom_smmu_data },
{ .compatible = "qcom,sdm845-smmu-500", .data = &qcom_smmu_data },
{ .compatible = "qcom,sm6125-smmu-500", .data = &qcom_smmu_data },
{ .compatible = "qcom,sm6350-smmu-500", .data = &qcom_smmu_data },
@@ -479,15 +492,6 @@ struct arm_smmu_device *qcom_smmu_impl_init(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
}
#endif
- /*
- * Do not change this order of implementation, i.e., first adreno
- * smmu impl and then apss smmu since we can have both implementing
- * arm,mmu-500 in which case we will miss setting adreno smmu specific
- * features if the order is changed.
- */
- if (of_device_is_compatible(np, "qcom,adreno-smmu"))
- return qcom_smmu_create(smmu, &qcom_adreno_smmu_data);
-
match = of_match_node(qcom_smmu_impl_of_match, np);
if (match)
return qcom_smmu_create(smmu, match->data);
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.h b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.h
index 2424f10b7110..424d8d342ce0 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.h
+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.h
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ struct qcom_smmu {
struct qcom_smmu_match_data {
const struct arm_smmu_impl *impl;
+ const struct arm_smmu_impl *adreno_impl;
};
#ifdef CONFIG_ARM_SMMU_QCOM_DEBUG
--
2.35.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-21 16:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-21 16:55 [RFC PATCH 0/9] iommy/arm-smmu-qcom: Rework Qualcomm SMMU bindings and implementation Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-10-21 16:55 ` [RFC PATCH 1/9] dt-bindings: arm-smmu: Add missing Qualcomm SMMU compatibles Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-10-22 0:59 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-10-22 9:17 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-10-22 15:42 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-10-22 15:43 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-10-21 16:55 ` [RFC PATCH 2/9] dt-bindings: arm-smmu: fix clocks/clock-names schema Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-10-21 21:00 ` Rob Herring
2022-10-21 16:55 ` [RFC PATCH 3/9] dt-bindings: arm-smmu: Add generic qcom,smmu-500 bindings Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-10-22 15:45 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-10-21 16:55 ` [RFC PATCH 4/9] iommu/arm-smmu-qcom: Move implementation data into match data Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-10-27 3:10 ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
2022-10-21 16:55 ` Dmitry Baryshkov [this message]
2022-10-27 3:11 ` [RFC PATCH 5/9] iommu/arm-smmu-qcom: Move the qcom,adreno-smmu check into qcom_smmu_create Sai Prakash Ranjan
2022-10-21 16:55 ` [RFC PATCH 6/9] iommu/arm-smmu-qcom: provide separate implementation for SDM845-smmu-500 Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-10-27 3:12 ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
2022-10-21 16:55 ` [RFC PATCH 7/9] iommu/arm-smmu-qcom: Merge table from arm-smmu-qcom-debug into match data Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-10-27 3:08 ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
2022-10-21 16:55 ` [RFC PATCH 8/9] iommu/arm-smmu-qcom: Stop using mmu500 reset for v2 MMUs Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-10-27 3:13 ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
2022-10-21 16:55 ` [RFC PATCH 9/9] iommu/arm-smmu-qcom: Add generic qcom,smmu-500 match entry Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-10-27 3:12 ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221021165534.2334329-6-dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org \
--to=dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org \
--cc=andersson@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=konrad.dybcio@somainline.org \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=quic_saipraka@quicinc.com \
--cc=robdclark@gmail.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).