Re: [PATCH 2/2] dt-bindings: phy: Fix UniPhier SATA controller node names in example

[Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>]

On Thu, Oct 27, 2022 at 01:49:20PM +0900, Kunihiko Hayashi wrote:
> The word "glue" is ambiguous for the controller node name. Should put
> "sata-controller" instead of "ahci-glue" on the controller node.
> And rename a phy node to "sata-phy".
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kunihiko Hayashi <hayashi.kunihiko@socionext.com>
> ---
>  .../devicetree/bindings/phy/socionext,uniphier-ahci-phy.yaml  | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/socionext,uniphier-ahci-phy.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/socionext,uniphier-ahci-phy.yaml
> index a3cd45acea28..89b8b133777a 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/socionext,uniphier-ahci-phy.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/socionext,uniphier-ahci-phy.yaml
> @@ -117,14 +117,14 @@ additionalProperties: false
>  
>  examples:
>    - |
> -    ahci-glue@65700000 {
> +    sata-controller@65700000 {

But is this really the SATA controller aka AHCI?

In cases where we don't have a standardized name, I don't think it makes 
sense changing node names from one non-standard name to another.

>          compatible = "socionext,uniphier-pxs3-ahci-glue",
>                       "simple-mfd";
>          #address-cells = <1>;
>          #size-cells = <1>;
>          ranges = <0 0x65700000 0x100>;
>  
> -        ahci_phy: phy@10 {
> +        ahci_phy: sata-phy@10 {
>              compatible = "socionext,uniphier-pxs3-ahci-phy";
>              reg = <0x10 0x10>;
>              #phy-cells = <0>;
> -- 
> 2.25.1
> 
>