From: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
To: Wadim Egorov <w.egorov@phytec.de>
Cc: <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<devicetree@vger.kernel.org>, <vigneshr@ti.com>,
<kristo@kernel.org>, <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
<krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: ti: Add bindings for PHYTEC AM64x based hardware
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2022 09:50:49 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221102145049.tpqo4qwhybbq6yuu@entitle> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221102134923.3438022-1-w.egorov@phytec.de>
On 14:49-20221102, Wadim Egorov wrote:
> Add devicetree bindings for AM64x based phyCORE-AM64 SoM
> and phyBOARD-Electra RDK.
Please add a immutable link to the product (if possible with board
information) etc.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wadim Egorov <w.egorov@phytec.de>
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/ti/k3.yaml | 6 ++++++
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/ti/k3.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/ti/k3.yaml
> index 28b8232e1c5b..2b9c045e39bf 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/ti/k3.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/ti/k3.yaml
> @@ -38,6 +38,12 @@ properties:
> - ti,am642-sk
> - const: ti,am642
>
> + - description: K3 AM642 SoC PHYTEC phyBOARD-Electra
> + items:
> + - const: phytec,am642-phyboard-electra-rdk
> + - const: phytec,am64-phycore-som
> + - const: ti,am642
Are there more platforms on the route based on the SoM that we can add
as a diff with a single board? Is this something we can club
with the previous entry in a manner that allows us to not to duplicate
ti,am642 ?
> +
> - description: K3 AM654 SoC
> items:
> - enum:
> --
> 2.34.1
>
--
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
Key (0xDDB5849D1736249D) / Fingerprint: F8A2 8693 54EB 8232 17A3 1A34 DDB5 849D 1736 249D
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-02 14:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-02 13:49 [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: ti: Add bindings for PHYTEC AM64x based hardware Wadim Egorov
2022-11-02 13:49 ` [PATCH 2/2] arm64: dts: Add support for phyBOARD-Electra-AM642 Wadim Egorov
2022-11-02 15:06 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-11-02 15:10 ` Nishanth Menon
2022-11-02 16:56 ` Wadim Egorov
2022-11-02 19:41 ` Nishanth Menon
2022-11-02 19:55 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-11-02 14:50 ` Nishanth Menon [this message]
2022-11-02 15:07 ` [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: ti: Add bindings for PHYTEC AM64x based hardware Krzysztof Kozlowski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221102145049.tpqo4qwhybbq6yuu@entitle \
--to=nm@ti.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kristo@kernel.org \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
--cc=w.egorov@phytec.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox