devicetree.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Roger Lu <roger.lu@mediatek.com>
To: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	Enric Balletbo Serra <eballetbo@gmail.com>,
	Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org>,
	Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@google.com>
Cc: Fan Chen <fan.chen@mediatek.com>,
	Roger Lu <roger.lu@mediatek.com>,
	Jia-wei Chang <jia-wei.chang@mediatek.com>,
	<devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
	<Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@mediatek.com>
Subject: [PATCH v1 07/13] soc: mtk-svs: mt8183: refactor o_slope calculation
Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2022 17:42:42 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221226094248.4506-8-roger.lu@mediatek.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221226094248.4506-1-roger.lu@mediatek.com>

The o_slope value is dependent of the o_slope_sign, refactor code to get
rid of unnecessary if constructs.

Signed-off-by: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Roger Lu <roger.lu@mediatek.com>
---
 drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-svs.c | 51 +++++++++++++++-------------------
 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-svs.c b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-svs.c
index 477f5bd1e1d1..2c1fbf11b554 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-svs.c
+++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-svs.c
@@ -1897,26 +1897,27 @@ static bool svs_mt8183_efuse_parsing(struct svs_platform *svsp)
 	o_slope_sign = (svsp->tefuse[0] >> 7) & BIT(0);
 
 	ts_id = (svsp->tefuse[1] >> 9) & BIT(0);
-	o_slope = (svsp->tefuse[0] >> 26) & GENMASK(5, 0);
-
-	if (adc_cali_en_t == 1) {
-		if (!ts_id)
-			o_slope = 0;
-
-		if (adc_ge_t < 265 || adc_ge_t > 758 ||
-		    adc_oe_t < 265 || adc_oe_t > 758 ||
-		    o_vtsmcu[0] < -8 || o_vtsmcu[0] > 484 ||
-		    o_vtsmcu[1] < -8 || o_vtsmcu[1] > 484 ||
-		    o_vtsmcu[2] < -8 || o_vtsmcu[2] > 484 ||
-		    o_vtsmcu[3] < -8 || o_vtsmcu[3] > 484 ||
-		    o_vtsmcu[4] < -8 || o_vtsmcu[4] > 484 ||
-		    o_vtsabb < -8 || o_vtsabb > 484 ||
-		    degc_cali < 1 || degc_cali > 63) {
-			dev_err(svsp->dev, "bad thermal efuse, no mon mode\n");
-			goto remove_mt8183_svsb_mon_mode;
-		}
+	if (!ts_id) {
+		o_slope = 1534;
 	} else {
-		dev_err(svsp->dev, "no thermal efuse, no mon mode\n");
+		o_slope = (svsp->tefuse[0] >> 26) & GENMASK(5, 0);
+		if (!o_slope_sign)
+			o_slope = 1534 + o_slope * 10;
+		else
+			o_slope = 1534 - o_slope * 10;
+	}
+
+	if (adc_cali_en_t == 0 ||
+	    adc_ge_t < 265 || adc_ge_t > 758 ||
+	    adc_oe_t < 265 || adc_oe_t > 758 ||
+	    o_vtsmcu[0] < -8 || o_vtsmcu[0] > 484 ||
+	    o_vtsmcu[1] < -8 || o_vtsmcu[1] > 484 ||
+	    o_vtsmcu[2] < -8 || o_vtsmcu[2] > 484 ||
+	    o_vtsmcu[3] < -8 || o_vtsmcu[3] > 484 ||
+	    o_vtsmcu[4] < -8 || o_vtsmcu[4] > 484 ||
+	    o_vtsabb < -8 || o_vtsabb > 484 ||
+	    degc_cali < 1 || degc_cali > 63) {
+		dev_err(svsp->dev, "bad thermal efuse, no mon mode\n");
 		goto remove_mt8183_svsb_mon_mode;
 	}
 
@@ -1935,11 +1936,7 @@ static bool svs_mt8183_efuse_parsing(struct svs_platform *svsp)
 		x_roomt[i] = (((format[i] * 10000) / 4096) * 10000) / gain;
 
 	temp0 = (10000 * 100000 / gain) * 15 / 18;
-
-	if (!o_slope_sign)
-		mts = (temp0 * 10) / (1534 + o_slope * 10);
-	else
-		mts = (temp0 * 10) / (1534 - o_slope * 10);
+	mts = (temp0 * 10) / o_slope;
 
 	for (idx = 0; idx < svsp->bank_max; idx++) {
 		svsb = &svsp->banks[idx];
@@ -1966,11 +1963,7 @@ static bool svs_mt8183_efuse_parsing(struct svs_platform *svsp)
 		temp0 = (degc_cali * 10 / 2);
 		temp1 = ((10000 * 100000 / 4096 / gain) *
 			 oe + tb_roomt * 10) * 15 / 18;
-
-		if (!o_slope_sign)
-			temp2 = temp1 * 100 / (1534 + o_slope * 10);
-		else
-			temp2 = temp1 * 100 / (1534 - o_slope * 10);
+		temp2 = temp1 * 100 / o_slope;
 
 		svsb->bts = (temp0 + temp2 - 250) * 4 / 10;
 	}
-- 
2.18.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-12-26  9:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-12-26  9:42 [PATCH v1 0/13] Enahance SVS's robustness Roger Lu
2022-12-26  9:42 ` [PATCH v1 01/13] soc: mediatek: mtk-svs: enable the IRQ later Roger Lu
2022-12-26  9:42 ` [PATCH v1 02/13] soc: mediatek: mtk-svs: clean up platform probing Roger Lu
2022-12-26  9:42 ` [PATCH v1 03/13] soc: mediatek: mtk-svs: improve readability of platform_probe Roger Lu
2022-12-26  9:42 ` [PATCH v1 04/13] soc: mediatek: mtk-svs: move svs_platform_probe into probe Roger Lu
2022-12-26  9:42 ` [PATCH v1 05/13] soc: mediatek: mtk-svs: delete superfluous platform data entries Roger Lu
2022-12-26  9:42 ` [PATCH v1 06/13] soc: mediatek: mtk-svs: use svs get efuse common function Roger Lu
2022-12-26  9:42 ` Roger Lu [this message]
2023-01-03 12:49   ` [PATCH v1 07/13] soc: mtk-svs: mt8183: refactor o_slope calculation AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2022-12-26  9:42 ` [PATCH v1 08/13] soc: mediatek: mtk-svs: add main_clk check during system-wide suspend Roger Lu
2022-12-26  9:42 ` [PATCH v1 09/13] soc: mediatek: mtk-svs: use common function to disable restore voltages Roger Lu
2023-01-03 12:49   ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2022-12-26  9:42 ` [PATCH v1 10/13] soc: mediatek: mtk-svs: restore default voltages when svs init02 fail Roger Lu
2023-01-03 12:49   ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2023-01-10  5:30     ` Roger Lu (陸瑞傑)
2022-12-26  9:42 ` [PATCH v1 11/13] soc: mediatek: mtk-svs: add thermal voltage compensation if needed Roger Lu
2023-01-03 12:49   ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2022-12-26  9:42 ` [PATCH v1 12/13] soc: mediatek: mtk-svs: Use pm_runtime_resume_and_get() in svs_init01() Roger Lu
2023-01-03 12:49   ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2022-12-26  9:42 ` [PATCH v1 13/13] soc: mediatek: mtk-svs: keep svs alive even though debug cmd create fail Roger Lu
2023-01-03 12:49   ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2023-01-10  5:35     ` Roger Lu (陸瑞傑)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20221226094248.4506-8-roger.lu@mediatek.com \
    --to=roger.lu@mediatek.com \
    --cc=Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@mediatek.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=drinkcat@google.com \
    --cc=eballetbo@gmail.com \
    --cc=fan.chen@mediatek.com \
    --cc=jia-wei.chang@mediatek.com \
    --cc=khilman@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).