From: Thinh Nguyen <Thinh.Nguyen@synopsys.com>
To: Jack Pham <quic_jackp@quicinc.com>
Cc: Thinh Nguyen <Thinh.Nguyen@synopsys.com>,
Krishna Kurapati <quic_kriskura@quicinc.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>,
Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
Felipe Balbi <balbi@kernel.org>,
"linux-usb@vger.kernel.org" <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
"quic_pkondeti@quicinc.com" <quic_pkondeti@quicinc.com>,
"quic_ppratap@quicinc.com" <quic_ppratap@quicinc.com>,
"quic_wcheng@quicinc.com" <quic_wcheng@quicinc.com>,
"quic_harshq@quicinc.com" <quic_harshq@quicinc.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC v4 3/5] usb: dwc3: core: Do not setup event buffers for host only controllers
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2023 02:32:21 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230119023216.q73djy4zdolhg325@synopsys.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230119015535.GF28337@jackp-linux.qualcomm.com>
On Wed, Jan 18, 2023, Jack Pham wrote:
> Hi Thinh,
>
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 12:38:51AM +0000, Thinh Nguyen wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 15, 2023, Krishna Kurapati wrote:
> > > Multiport controllers being host-only capable do not have GEVNTADDR
>
> Multiport may not be relevant here. Host-only is though.
>
> > > HI/LO, SIZE, COUNT reigsters present. Accsesing them to setup event
> >
> > I think you should reword "present" to something else. They're still
> > present
>
> In our case we have an instance where the IP is statically configured
> via coreConsultant with DWC_USB31_MODE==1 (host only) and we did observe
> that none of the registers pertaining to device mode (including GEVNT*
> and of course all the D* ones) are even *present* in the register map.
> If we try to access them we encounter some kind of access error or stall
> (or translation fault as described). So the approach here is to first
> verify by checking the HWPARAMS0 register if the HW is even capable of
> device mode in the first place.
I see.
>
> > but those registers are to be set while operating in device
> > mode. The rest looks fine.
>
> Are you suggesting only touching the GEVNT* registers when *operating*
> in device mode, even in the case of a dual-role capable controller? In
> that case would it make more sense to additionally move the calls to
> dwc3_event_buffers_{setup,cleanup} out of core.c and into
> dwc3_gadget_{init,exit} perhaps? That way we avoid them completely
While it shouldn't be a problem for DRD, it may be cleaner to do that.
> unless and until we switch into peripheral mode (assuming controller
> supports that, which we should already have checks for). Moreover, if
> the devicetree dr_mode property is set to host-only we'd also avoid
> calling these.
>
> > > buffers during core_init can cause an SMMU Fault. Avoid event buffers
> > > setup if the GHWPARAMS0 tells that the controller is host-only.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Krishna Kurapati <quic_kriskura@quicinc.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c | 23 +++++++++++++++--------
> > > 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c b/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c
> > > index 7e0a9a598dfd..f61ebddaecc0 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c
> > > @@ -871,9 +871,12 @@ static void dwc3_clk_disable(struct dwc3 *dwc)
> > >
> > > static void dwc3_core_exit(struct dwc3 *dwc)
> > > {
> > > - int i;
> > > + int i;
> > > + unsigned int hw_mode;
> > >
> > > - dwc3_event_buffers_cleanup(dwc);
> > > + hw_mode = DWC3_GHWPARAMS0_MODE(dwc->hwparams.hwparams0);
> > > + if (hw_mode != DWC3_GHWPARAMS0_MODE_HOST)
>
> If we stick with this approach, we probably could just check
> dwc->dr_mode instead as probe should have already set that to be an
> intersection between the values given in devicetree "dr_mode" and the
> HWPARAMS0 capability.
>
What we have here should not break DRD, so it's fine either way.
Thanks,
Thinh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-19 2:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-15 11:41 [RFC v4 0/5] Add multiport support for DWC3 controllers Krishna Kurapati
2023-01-15 11:41 ` [RFC v4 1/5] dt-bindings: usb: Add bindings to support multiport properties Krishna Kurapati
2023-01-15 15:11 ` Rob Herring
2023-01-16 16:34 ` Rob Herring
2023-01-17 9:01 ` Krishna Kurapati PSSNV
2023-01-17 11:02 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-01-17 14:01 ` Krishna Kurapati PSSNV
2023-01-18 18:20 ` Bjorn Andersson
2023-01-15 11:41 ` [RFC v4 2/5] usb: dwc3: core: Refactor PHY logic to support Multiport Controller Krishna Kurapati
2023-01-19 0:36 ` Thinh Nguyen
2023-01-19 3:01 ` Krishna Kurapati PSSNV
2023-01-20 1:02 ` Thinh Nguyen
2023-01-20 1:46 ` Krishna Kurapati PSSNV
2023-01-20 22:44 ` Thinh Nguyen
2023-01-21 2:09 ` Krishna Kurapati PSSNV
2023-01-25 10:07 ` Krishna Kurapati PSSNV
2023-01-25 19:08 ` Thinh Nguyen
2023-01-25 20:49 ` Jack Pham
2023-01-25 22:27 ` Thinh Nguyen
2023-01-20 22:57 ` Thinh Nguyen
2023-01-21 2:06 ` Krishna Kurapati PSSNV
2023-01-21 2:19 ` Thinh Nguyen
2023-01-21 2:24 ` Krishna Kurapati PSSNV
2023-01-21 2:55 ` Thinh Nguyen
2023-01-19 22:09 ` Andrew Halaney
2023-01-20 1:55 ` Krishna Kurapati PSSNV
2023-01-20 14:37 ` Andrew Halaney
2023-01-20 15:13 ` Krishna Kurapati PSSNV
2023-01-20 15:18 ` Krishna Kurapati PSSNV
2023-01-24 8:21 ` Shazad Hussain
2023-01-15 11:41 ` [RFC v4 3/5] usb: dwc3: core: Do not setup event buffers for host only controllers Krishna Kurapati
2023-01-19 0:38 ` Thinh Nguyen
2023-01-19 1:57 ` Jack Pham
2023-01-19 2:32 ` Thinh Nguyen [this message]
2023-01-15 11:41 ` [RFC v4 4/5] usb: dwc3: qcom: Add multiport controller support for qcom wrapper Krishna Kurapati
2023-01-15 11:41 ` [RFC v4 5/5] arm: dts: msm: Add multiport controller node for usb Krishna Kurapati
2023-01-18 18:28 ` Bjorn Andersson
2023-01-18 18:31 ` Krishna Kurapati PSSNV
2023-01-19 3:43 ` [RFC v4 0/5] Add multiport support for DWC3 controllers Bjorn Andersson
2023-01-19 5:17 ` Krishna Kurapati PSSNV
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230119023216.q73djy4zdolhg325@synopsys.com \
--to=thinh.nguyen@synopsys.com \
--cc=agross@kernel.org \
--cc=andersson@kernel.org \
--cc=balbi@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=konrad.dybcio@linaro.org \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=p.zabel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=quic_harshq@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_jackp@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_kriskura@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_pkondeti@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_ppratap@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_wcheng@quicinc.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).