From: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
To: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
Cc: Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti@rivosinc.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>, Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] riscv: Use PUD/P4D/PGD pages for the linear mapping
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2023 15:19:33 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230130141933.wuikrruh2svkcfv4@orel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAL_JsqJ8JtkOBLpdf3hU9JWcdRTFr3Ss1Hd+yFpMqs7ujUiyCQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 07:48:04AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 6:13 AM Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti@rivosinc.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 11:41 AM Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 03:25:54PM +0100, Andrew Jones wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 12:28:02PM +0100, Alexandre Ghiti wrote:
> > > > > During the early page table creation, we used to set the mapping for
> > > > > PAGE_OFFSET to the kernel load address: but the kernel load address is
> > > > > always offseted by PMD_SIZE which makes it impossible to use PUD/P4D/PGD
> > > > > pages as this physical address is not aligned on PUD/P4D/PGD size (whereas
> > > > > PAGE_OFFSET is).
>
> [...]
>
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/of/fdt.c b/drivers/of/fdt.c
> > > > > index f08b25195ae7..58107bd56f8f 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/of/fdt.c
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/of/fdt.c
> > > > > @@ -891,12 +891,13 @@ const void * __init of_flat_dt_match_machine(const void *default_match,
> > > > > static void __early_init_dt_declare_initrd(unsigned long start,
> > > > > unsigned long end)
> > > > > {
> > > > > - /* ARM64 would cause a BUG to occur here when CONFIG_DEBUG_VM is
> > > > > - * enabled since __va() is called too early. ARM64 does make use
> > > > > - * of phys_initrd_start/phys_initrd_size so we can skip this
> > > > > - * conversion.
> > > > > + /*
> > > > > + * __va() is not yet available this early on some platforms. In that
> > > > > + * case, the platform uses phys_initrd_start/phys_initrd_size instead
> > > > > + * and does the VA conversion itself.
> > > > > */
> > > > > - if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64)) {
> > > > > + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64) &&
> > > > > + !(IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RISCV) && IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_64BIT))) {
> > > >
> > > > There are now two architectures, so maybe it's time for a new config
> > > > symbol which would be selected by arm64 and riscv64 and then used here,
> > > > e.g.
> > > >
> > > > if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NO_EARLY_LINEAR_MAP)) {
> > >
> > > I see v5 left this as it was. Any comment on this suggestion?
> >
> > Introducing a config for this only use case sounds excessive to me,
> > but I'll let Rob decide what he wants to see here.
>
> Agreed. Can we just keep it as is here.
>
> > > > > initrd_start = (unsigned long)__va(start);
> > > > > initrd_end = (unsigned long)__va(end);
>
> I think long term, we should just get rid of needing to do this part
> in the DT code and let the initrd code do this.
initrd code provides reserve_initrd_mem() for this and riscv calls
it later on. afaict, this early setting in OF code is a convenience
which architectures could be taught not to depend on, and then it
could be removed. But, until then, some architectures will need to
avoid it. As I commented downthread, I also don't want to go with
a config anymore, but it'd be nice to keep arch-specifics out of
here, so I've posted a patch changing __early_init_dt_declare_initrd
to be a weak function.
Thanks,
drew
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-30 14:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-23 11:28 [PATCH v4] riscv: Use PUD/P4D/PGD pages for the linear mapping Alexandre Ghiti
2023-01-23 14:25 ` Andrew Jones
2023-01-25 10:41 ` Andrew Jones
2023-01-25 12:12 ` Alexandre Ghiti
2023-01-25 15:10 ` Andrew Jones
2023-01-27 8:45 ` Alexandre Ghiti
2023-01-27 8:58 ` Andrew Jones
2023-01-28 10:13 ` Andrew Jones
2023-01-30 13:48 ` Rob Herring
2023-01-30 14:19 ` Andrew Jones [this message]
2023-01-30 14:57 ` Rob Herring
2023-01-23 22:10 ` Conor Dooley
2023-01-24 9:04 ` Alexandre Ghiti
2023-01-24 0:19 ` kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230130141933.wuikrruh2svkcfv4@orel \
--to=ajones@ventanamicro.com \
--cc=alexghiti@rivosinc.com \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=frowand.list@gmail.com \
--cc=guoren@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).