From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 297A2C54EAA for ; Mon, 30 Jan 2023 15:59:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230340AbjA3P7W (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Jan 2023 10:59:22 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:38384 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S237769AbjA3P7I (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Jan 2023 10:59:08 -0500 Received: from mail-oa1-f46.google.com (mail-oa1-f46.google.com [209.85.160.46]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B2D153F286; Mon, 30 Jan 2023 07:58:42 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-oa1-f46.google.com with SMTP id 586e51a60fabf-1631b928691so15508195fac.11; Mon, 30 Jan 2023 07:58:42 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=92ylG2q5d+cXOP0ReRMncsJUB/Zg6KaFUynLvEqS9XA=; b=GxqCXAFdNRUNfkOQ6x2LF0tuNWhroSu/zjFqsNQjWTfB7uoICx1Huxu2kyHFVGCzfD Vgjpp9k42+7TYt3ObUd4D5Eh1s9dYFSu7ZhImvmRRulVUMPyt9IbnYXP1taHn5boku6V 65YzkgWshH6c/JmumSj5dG8Gd3KiKJvFOoUvbOUGFYElEq/fjsasDIb/Y/q3YPGIvYvd mqnQE+L7752S19qSbbAQk16sBwA1lx2nQIkTuw2fiakOKnXL/zm/nGb2Oo4UNcEfX9Tv In28WgzpGC0D8YQjolmPiK5coLurlEeUuhS+t2/lxCFg7v043iW/flXdtMPfvAqt/Mpj Fnmw== X-Gm-Message-State: AFqh2koGI7zxAaoy6+d8wTvKkhqmoQ/vU/rStQ+osiC92jRW2alYb0dp zzjUghaYyo1YeNBqUq36Ug== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMrXdXt0IHRcFx9GapnPz7re2QJTCPhvFjUUyqmVAx1CEICu0Q4iLGY8886mGxNbCmnlazAHZIoeJw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:687c:209:b0:15f:2e5:96ae with SMTP id ax9-20020a05687c020900b0015f02e596aemr19945434oac.27.1675094321901; Mon, 30 Jan 2023 07:58:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from robh_at_kernel.org (66-90-144-107.dyn.grandenetworks.net. [66.90.144.107]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e8-20020a9d5608000000b0066b9a6bf3bcsm5526341oti.12.2023.01.30.07.58.41 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 30 Jan 2023 07:58:41 -0800 (PST) Received: (nullmailer pid 2722384 invoked by uid 1000); Mon, 30 Jan 2023 15:58:40 -0000 Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2023 09:58:40 -0600 From: Rob Herring To: Jacopo Mondi Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski , chiranjeevi.rapolu@intel.com, luca@z3ntu.xyz, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org, laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com, sakari.ailus@iki.fi, mchehab@kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v6.1] media: dt-bindings: Add OV5670 Message-ID: <20230130155840.GA2706990-robh@kernel.org> References: <20230126165909.121302-2-jacopo.mondi@ideasonboard.com> <20230128112736.8000-1-jacopo.mondi@ideasonboard.com> <20230129121132.uamuvywdsuah5ivn@uno.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230129121132.uamuvywdsuah5ivn@uno.localdomain> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Jan 29, 2023 at 01:11:32PM +0100, Jacopo Mondi wrote: > On Sun, Jan 29, 2023 at 12:40:03PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > On 28/01/2023 12:27, Jacopo Mondi wrote: > > > Add the bindings documentation for Omnivision OV5670 image sensor. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Jacopo Mondi > > > --- > > > v6->6.1 > > > - Use additionalProperties: false for endpoint properties from > > > video-interfaces.yaml > > > - List 'remote-endpoint' among the accepted endpoint properties > > > now that we use additionalProperties: false > > > > b4 diff '20230128112736.8000-1-jacopo.mondi@ideasonboard.com' > > Could not create fake-am range for lower series v1 > > > > Can you send patches in a way it does not break out workflows? Why > > making our review process more difficult? > > Because it's a nit on a 10 patches series with no other changes > requested ? So? Think of patch series as an 'email transport' for your git branches. If you rebase your branch, that's a whole new branch to send. > What is difficult exactly ? In addition to 'b4 diff', if a maintainer is applying this series, for a v7 they just do: b4 shazam msgid-of-v7 For v6.1, they do: b4 shazam msgid-of-v6 git rebase -i ... git reset --hard HEAD^ b4 shazam msgid-of-v6.1 git rebase --continue Which one makes the maintainer's life easier? If it's a CI job trying to apply and test this, there's no way it's going to do the second case. Rob