From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/16] Qcom: Fix PCI I/O range defined in devicetree
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2023 16:59:35 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230301112935.GD5409@thinkpad> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c5e36887-f84d-40ef-bef9-8a3947bbb73f@app.fastmail.com>
On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 05:58:37PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2023, at 17:47, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > This series fixes the issue with PCI I/O ranges defined in devicetree of
> > Qualcomm SoCs as reported by Arnd [1]. Most of the Qualcomm SoCs define
> > identical mapping for the PCI I/O range. But the PCI device I/O ports
> > are usually located between 0x0 to 64KiB/1MiB. So the defined PCI addresses are
> > mostly bogus. The lack of bug report on this issue indicates that no one really
> > tested legacy PCI devices with these SoCs.
> >
> > This series also contains a couple of cleanup patches that aligns the entries of
> > ranges property.
>
> Looks good to me. I already commented that we may also want to use
> 64KB everywhere instead of 1MB for the per-host window size.
I also spotted this discrepancy while working on this series, but the size
seems to be not universal across SoCs from many vendors. So I settled with
whatever range that was used before.
> Regardless of that, please add
>
> Reviewed-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
>
> I would also prefer to do this in fewer patches, maybe one to
> change all the prefixes, and another one to change the location,
> or whichever way Bjorn prefers.
>
Well, the only intention of doing a per-patch change is to backport them if
needed. But I'll defer it to Bjorn.
Thanks,
Mani
> Arnd
--
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-01 11:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-28 16:47 [PATCH 00/16] Qcom: Fix PCI I/O range defined in devicetree Manivannan Sadhasivam
2023-02-28 16:47 ` [PATCH 01/16] arm64: dts: qcom: sdm845: Fix the PCI I/O port range Manivannan Sadhasivam
2023-02-28 16:55 ` Arnd Bergmann
2023-02-28 16:47 ` [PATCH 02/16] arm64: dts: qcom: msm8998: " Manivannan Sadhasivam
2023-02-28 16:47 ` [PATCH 03/16] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: " Manivannan Sadhasivam
2023-02-28 16:47 ` [PATCH 04/16] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8550: " Manivannan Sadhasivam
2023-02-28 16:47 ` [PATCH 05/16] arm64: dts: qcom: ipq8074: " Manivannan Sadhasivam
2023-02-28 16:47 ` [PATCH 06/16] arm64: dts: qcom: ipq6018: " Manivannan Sadhasivam
2023-02-28 16:47 ` [PATCH 07/16] arm64: dts: qcom: msm8996: " Manivannan Sadhasivam
2023-02-28 16:47 ` [PATCH 08/16] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8250: " Manivannan Sadhasivam
2023-02-28 16:47 ` [PATCH 09/16] arm64: dts: qcom: qcs404: Use 0x prefix for the PCI I/O and MEM ranges Manivannan Sadhasivam
2023-02-28 16:47 ` [PATCH 10/16] arm64: dts: qcom: sc8280xp: Fix the PCI I/O port range Manivannan Sadhasivam
2023-02-28 16:47 ` [PATCH 11/16] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8150: " Manivannan Sadhasivam
2023-02-28 16:47 ` [PATCH 12/16] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8450: " Manivannan Sadhasivam
2023-02-28 16:47 ` [PATCH 13/16] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8350: " Manivannan Sadhasivam
2023-02-28 16:47 ` [PATCH 14/16] ARM: dts: qcom: apq8064: Use 0x prefix for the PCI I/O and MEM ranges Manivannan Sadhasivam
2023-02-28 16:47 ` [PATCH 15/16] ARM: dts: qcom: ipq4019: Fix the PCI I/O port range Manivannan Sadhasivam
2023-02-28 16:47 ` [PATCH 16/16] ARM: dts: qcom: ipq8064: " Manivannan Sadhasivam
2023-02-28 16:58 ` [PATCH 00/16] Qcom: Fix PCI I/O range defined in devicetree Arnd Bergmann
2023-03-01 11:29 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam [this message]
2023-03-01 11:57 ` Arnd Bergmann
2023-02-28 17:29 ` Andrew Halaney
2023-03-01 11:32 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2023-03-16 3:20 ` (subset) " Bjorn Andersson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230301112935.GD5409@thinkpad \
--to=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
--cc=andersson@kernel.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=konrad.dybcio@linaro.org \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).