* [PATCH] cpufreq: Use of_property_present() for testing DT property presence
@ 2023-03-10 14:47 Rob Herring
2023-03-13 4:28 ` Viresh Kumar
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Rob Herring @ 2023-03-10 14:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki, Viresh Kumar, Shawn Guo, Sascha Hauer,
Pengutronix Kernel Team, Fabio Estevam, NXP Linux Team,
Sudeep Holla, Cristian Marussi, Thierry Reding, Jonathan Hunter
Cc: devicetree, linux-pm, linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel, linux-tegra
It is preferred to use typed property access functions (i.e.
of_property_read_<type> functions) rather than low-level
of_get_property/of_find_property functions for reading properties. As
part of this, convert of_get_property/of_find_property calls to the
recently added of_property_present() helper when we just want to test
for presence of a property and nothing more.
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
---
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c | 2 +-
drivers/cpufreq/imx-cpufreq-dt.c | 2 +-
drivers/cpufreq/imx6q-cpufreq.c | 4 ++--
drivers/cpufreq/scmi-cpufreq.c | 2 +-
drivers/cpufreq/tegra20-cpufreq.c | 2 +-
5 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c
index e85703651098..5ac6b9e5270e 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c
@@ -179,7 +179,7 @@ static bool __init cpu0_node_has_opp_v2_prop(void)
struct device_node *np = of_cpu_device_node_get(0);
bool ret = false;
- if (of_get_property(np, "operating-points-v2", NULL))
+ if (of_property_present(np, "operating-points-v2"))
ret = true;
of_node_put(np);
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/imx-cpufreq-dt.c b/drivers/cpufreq/imx-cpufreq-dt.c
index 76e553af2071..535867a7dfdd 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/imx-cpufreq-dt.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/imx-cpufreq-dt.c
@@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ static int imx_cpufreq_dt_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
cpu_dev = get_cpu_device(0);
- if (!of_find_property(cpu_dev->of_node, "cpu-supply", NULL))
+ if (!of_property_present(cpu_dev->of_node, "cpu-supply"))
return -ENODEV;
if (of_machine_is_compatible("fsl,imx7ulp")) {
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/imx6q-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/imx6q-cpufreq.c
index ad4ce8493144..48e1772e98fd 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/imx6q-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/imx6q-cpufreq.c
@@ -222,7 +222,7 @@ static int imx6q_opp_check_speed_grading(struct device *dev)
u32 val;
int ret;
- if (of_find_property(dev->of_node, "nvmem-cells", NULL)) {
+ if (of_property_present(dev->of_node, "nvmem-cells")) {
ret = nvmem_cell_read_u32(dev, "speed_grade", &val);
if (ret)
return ret;
@@ -279,7 +279,7 @@ static int imx6ul_opp_check_speed_grading(struct device *dev)
u32 val;
int ret = 0;
- if (of_find_property(dev->of_node, "nvmem-cells", NULL)) {
+ if (of_property_present(dev->of_node, "nvmem-cells")) {
ret = nvmem_cell_read_u32(dev, "speed_grade", &val);
if (ret)
return ret;
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/scmi-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/scmi-cpufreq.c
index 513a071845c2..f34e6382a4c5 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/scmi-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/scmi-cpufreq.c
@@ -310,7 +310,7 @@ static int scmi_cpufreq_probe(struct scmi_device *sdev)
#ifdef CONFIG_COMMON_CLK
/* dummy clock provider as needed by OPP if clocks property is used */
- if (of_find_property(dev->of_node, "#clock-cells", NULL))
+ if (of_property_present(dev->of_node, "#clock-cells"))
devm_of_clk_add_hw_provider(dev, of_clk_hw_simple_get, NULL);
#endif
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/tegra20-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/tegra20-cpufreq.c
index ab7ac7df9e62..dfd2de4f8e07 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/tegra20-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/tegra20-cpufreq.c
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ static bool cpu0_node_has_opp_v2_prop(void)
struct device_node *np = of_cpu_device_node_get(0);
bool ret = false;
- if (of_get_property(np, "operating-points-v2", NULL))
+ if (of_property_present(np, "operating-points-v2"))
ret = true;
of_node_put(np);
--
2.39.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Use of_property_present() for testing DT property presence
2023-03-10 14:47 [PATCH] cpufreq: Use of_property_present() for testing DT property presence Rob Herring
@ 2023-03-13 4:28 ` Viresh Kumar
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Viresh Kumar @ 2023-03-13 4:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rob Herring
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Shawn Guo, Sascha Hauer,
Pengutronix Kernel Team, Fabio Estevam, NXP Linux Team,
Sudeep Holla, Cristian Marussi, Thierry Reding, Jonathan Hunter,
devicetree, linux-pm, linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel, linux-tegra
On 10-03-23, 08:47, Rob Herring wrote:
> It is preferred to use typed property access functions (i.e.
> of_property_read_<type> functions) rather than low-level
> of_get_property/of_find_property functions for reading properties. As
> part of this, convert of_get_property/of_find_property calls to the
> recently added of_property_present() helper when we just want to test
> for presence of a property and nothing more.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c | 2 +-
> drivers/cpufreq/imx-cpufreq-dt.c | 2 +-
> drivers/cpufreq/imx6q-cpufreq.c | 4 ++--
> drivers/cpufreq/scmi-cpufreq.c | 2 +-
> drivers/cpufreq/tegra20-cpufreq.c | 2 +-
> 5 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
Applied. Thanks.
--
viresh
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-03-13 4:28 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-03-10 14:47 [PATCH] cpufreq: Use of_property_present() for testing DT property presence Rob Herring
2023-03-13 4:28 ` Viresh Kumar
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).