Re: [PATCH v8 06/11] remoteproc: mediatek: Probe multi-core SCP

[Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>]

On Fri, Mar 03, 2023 at 04:33:50PM +0800, Tinghan Shen wrote:
> The difference of single-core SCP and multi-core SCP device tree is
> the presence of child device nodes described SCP cores. The SCP
> driver populates the platform device and checks the child nodes
> to identify whether it's a single-core SCP or a multi-core SCP.
> 
> The resource structure of the multi-core SCP is a list of remoteproc
> instances which is different to the single-core SCP. The corresponding
> resource releasing action is based on the type of SCP.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tinghan Shen <tinghan.shen@mediatek.com>
> ---
>  drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h |   4 +
>  drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c    | 177 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>  2 files changed, 166 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h
> index c0905aec3b4b..c088149e3dcc 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h
> @@ -128,6 +128,10 @@ struct mtk_scp {
>  	size_t dram_size;
>  
>  	struct rproc_subdev *rpmsg_subdev;
> +
> +	struct list_head elem;
> +	struct list_head cluster_cores;
> +	struct list_head *cluster;
>  };
>  
>  /**
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
> index bdb5d87eeaa3..84103a70f426 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
> @@ -863,7 +863,9 @@ static void scp_remove_rpmsg_subdev(struct mtk_scp *scp)
>  }
>  
>  static int scp_rproc_init(struct platform_device *pdev,
> -			  struct mtk_scp_of_regs *of_regs)
> +			  struct mtk_scp_of_regs *of_regs,
> +			  const struct mtk_scp_of_data *of_data,
> +			  bool is_multi_core)

The @is_multi_core variable is a hack and needs to be removed.

>  {
>  	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>  	struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
> @@ -884,7 +886,7 @@ static int scp_rproc_init(struct platform_device *pdev,
>  	scp = (struct mtk_scp *)rproc->priv;
>  	scp->rproc = rproc;
>  	scp->dev = dev;
> -	scp->data = of_device_get_match_data(dev);
> +	scp->data = of_data;
>  	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, scp);
>  
>  	scp->reg_base = of_regs->reg_base;
> @@ -933,9 +935,11 @@ static int scp_rproc_init(struct platform_device *pdev,
>  		goto remove_subdev;
>  	}
>  
> -	ret = rproc_add(rproc);
> -	if (ret)
> -		goto remove_subdev;
> +	if (!is_multi_core) {
> +		ret = rproc_add(rproc);
> +		if (ret)
> +			goto remove_subdev;
> +	}

This is also a hack.  The same code should be used to do the initialization of a
remotre processor, whether it is unique or part of a cluster.

>  
>  	return 0;
>  
> @@ -951,9 +955,123 @@ static int scp_rproc_init(struct platform_device *pdev,
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> +static void scp_rproc_free(struct mtk_scp *scp)
> +{
> +	int i;
> +
> +	scp_remove_rpmsg_subdev(scp);
> +	scp_ipi_unregister(scp, SCP_IPI_INIT);
> +	scp_unmap_memory_region(scp);
> +	for (i = 0; i < SCP_IPI_MAX; i++)
> +		mutex_destroy(&scp->ipi_desc[i].lock);
> +	mutex_destroy(&scp->send_lock);
> +}
> +
> +static void scp_rproc_exit(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> +	struct mtk_scp *scp = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> +
> +	rproc_del(scp->rproc);
> +	scp_rproc_free(scp);
> +}
> +
> +static int scp_cluster_init(struct platform_device *pdev,
> +			    struct mtk_scp_of_regs *of_regs)
> +{
> +	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> +	struct device_node *np = dev_of_node(dev);
> +	struct platform_device *cpdev;
> +	struct device_node *child;
> +	const struct mtk_scp_of_data **cluster_of_data;
> +	struct list_head *cluster = NULL;
> +	struct mtk_scp *scp, *temp;
> +	int core_id = 0, num_cores;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	cluster_of_data = (const struct mtk_scp_of_data **)of_device_get_match_data(dev);
> +
> +	for (num_cores = 0; cluster_of_data[num_cores]; num_cores++)
> +		;

Definitely remove.  Either use ARRAY_SIZE() or of_get_available_child_count().

> +
> +	for_each_available_child_of_node(np, child) {
> +		if (core_id >= num_cores) {
> +			ret = -EINVAL;
> +			dev_err(dev, "Not support core %d\n", core_id);
> +			of_node_put(child);
> +			goto init_fail;
> +		}
> +
> +		cpdev = of_find_device_by_node(child);
> +		if (!cpdev) {
> +			ret = -ENODEV;
> +			dev_err(dev, "Not found platform device for core %d\n", core_id);
> +			of_node_put(child);
> +			goto init_fail;
> +		}
> +
> +		ret = scp_rproc_init(cpdev, of_regs, cluster_of_data[core_id], true);
> +		if (ret) {
> +			dev_err(dev, "Failed to initialize core %d rproc\n", core_id);
> +			put_device(&cpdev->dev);
> +			of_node_put(child);
> +			goto init_fail;
> +		}
> +
> +		scp = platform_get_drvdata(cpdev);
> +		put_device(&cpdev->dev);
> +		if (core_id == 0) {
> +			INIT_LIST_HEAD(&scp->cluster_cores);
> +			cluster = &scp->cluster_cores;
> +			platform_set_drvdata(pdev, cluster);
> +		}

This should go in scp_probe().

> +
> +		list_add_tail(&scp->elem, cluster);
> +		scp->cluster = cluster;
> +
> +		of_node_put(child);

Is this needed?

> +		core_id++;
> +	}
> +
> +	list_for_each_entry_safe_reverse(scp, temp, cluster, elem) {
> +		ret = rproc_add(scp->rproc);

This code is complex and hard to read because rproc_add() is called in two
different context.  From a code perspective single core remote processors should
be treated as a one core cluster.

I am done reviewing this patchset.

Thanks,
Mathieu

> +		if (ret)
> +			goto add_fail;
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +
> +add_fail:
> +	list_for_each_entry_continue(scp, cluster, elem) {
> +		rproc_del(scp->rproc);
> +	}
> +init_fail:
> +	if (cluster) {
> +		list_for_each_entry_safe_reverse(scp, temp, cluster, elem) {
> +			list_del(&scp->elem);
> +			scp_rproc_free(scp);
> +		}
> +	}
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static void scp_cluster_exit(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> +	struct list_head *cluster = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> +	struct platform_device *cpdev;
> +	struct mtk_scp *scp, *temp;
> +
> +	list_for_each_entry_safe_reverse(scp, temp, cluster, elem) {
> +		list_del(&scp->elem);
> +		cpdev = to_platform_device(scp->dev);
> +		scp_rproc_exit(cpdev);
> +	}
> +}
> +
>  static int scp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  {
>  	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> +	struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
> +	struct device_node *core_node;
>  	struct resource *res;
>  	struct mtk_scp_of_regs scp_regs;
>  	int ret;
> @@ -976,21 +1094,43 @@ static int scp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  		scp_regs.l1tcm_phys = res->start;
>  	}
>  
> -	return scp_rproc_init(pdev, &scp_regs);
> +	ret = devm_of_platform_populate(dev);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "Failed to populate platform devices\n");
> +
> +	core_node = of_get_child_by_name(np, "scp");
> +	of_node_put(core_node);

Please use of_get_available_child_count()

> +
> +	if (!core_node) {
> +		dev_info(dev, "single-core scp\n");
> +
> +		ret = scp_rproc_init(pdev, &scp_regs, of_device_get_match_data(dev), false);
> +		if (ret)
> +			return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "Failed to initialize single-core scp\n");
> +	} else {
> +		dev_info(dev, "multi-core scp\n");
> +
> +		ret = scp_cluster_init(pdev, &scp_regs);
> +		if (ret)
> +			return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "Failed to initialize scp cluster\n");
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
>  }
>  
>  static int scp_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  {
> -	struct mtk_scp *scp = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> -	int i;
> +	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> +	struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
> +	struct device_node *core_node;
>  
> -	rproc_del(scp->rproc);
> -	scp_remove_rpmsg_subdev(scp);
> -	scp_ipi_unregister(scp, SCP_IPI_INIT);
> -	scp_unmap_memory_region(scp);
> -	for (i = 0; i < SCP_IPI_MAX; i++)
> -		mutex_destroy(&scp->ipi_desc[i].lock);
> -	mutex_destroy(&scp->send_lock);
> +	core_node = of_get_child_by_name(np, "scp");
> +	of_node_put(core_node);
> +
> +	if (!core_node)
> +		scp_rproc_exit(pdev);
> +	else
> +		scp_cluster_exit(pdev);
>  
>  	return 0;
>  }
> @@ -1069,12 +1209,19 @@ static const struct mtk_scp_of_data mt8195_of_data_c1 = {
>  	.host_to_scp_int_bit = MT8195_CORE1_HOST_IPC_INT_BIT,
>  };
>  
> +static const struct mtk_scp_of_data *mt8195_of_data_cores[] = {
> +	&mt8195_of_data,
> +	&mt8195_of_data_c1,
> +	NULL
> +};
> +
>  static const struct of_device_id mtk_scp_of_match[] = {
>  	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8183-scp", .data = &mt8183_of_data },
>  	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8186-scp", .data = &mt8186_of_data },
>  	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8188-scp", .data = &mt8188_of_data },
>  	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8192-scp", .data = &mt8192_of_data },
>  	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8195-scp", .data = &mt8195_of_data },
> +	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8195-scp-dual", .data = &mt8195_of_data_cores },
>  	{},
>  };
>  MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, mtk_scp_of_match);
> -- 
> 2.18.0
>