From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@linaro.org>
Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>,
Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@kernel.org>,
Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>,
Avri Altman <avri.altman@wdc.com>,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
"James E . J . Bottomley" <jejb@linux.ibm.com>,
"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/6] scsi: ufs: ufs-qcom: Switch to the new ICE API
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2023 13:16:34 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230406201634.GA20288@sol.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230403200530.2103099-5-abel.vesa@linaro.org>
Hi Abel,
On Mon, Apr 03, 2023 at 11:05:28PM +0300, Abel Vesa wrote:
> Now that there is a new dedicated ICE driver, drop the ufs-qcom-ice and
> use the new ICE api provided by the Qualcomm soc driver ice. The platforms
> that already have ICE support will use the API as library since there will
> not be a devicetree node, but instead they have reg range. In this case,
> the of_qcom_ice_get will return an ICE instance created for the consumer's
> device. But if there are platforms that do not have ice reg in the
> consumer devicetree node and instead provide a dedicated ICE devicetree
> node, the of_qcom_ice_get will look up the device based on qcom,ice
> property and will get the ICE instance registered by the probe function
> of the ice driver.
>
> Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@linaro.org>
This is still silent about how the ICE clock behavior is being changed.
I'm still trying to understand all this myself, so please bear with me, but my
understanding is that the UFS clocks can be disabled even while the host
controller is runtime-resumed. This is called "clock gating" in the code.
Before, the ICE clock was just listed as one of the UFS clocks. So, it was just
managed like the other UFS clocks.
Now, it appears that the ICE clock is always enabled while the host controller
is runtime-resumed. So, this patch removes support for gating of the ICE clock.
Is that intended?
- Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-06 20:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-03 20:05 [PATCH v5 0/6] Add dedicated Qcom ICE driver Abel Vesa
2023-04-03 20:05 ` [PATCH v5 1/6] dt-bindings: crypto: Add Qualcomm Inline Crypto Engine Abel Vesa
2023-04-03 20:05 ` [PATCH v5 2/6] dt-bindings: ufs: qcom: Add ICE phandle Abel Vesa
2023-04-04 5:41 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-04-04 8:59 ` Abel Vesa
2023-04-04 10:12 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-04-04 10:41 ` Abel Vesa
2023-04-04 11:03 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-04-03 20:05 ` [PATCH v5 3/6] soc: qcom: Make the Qualcomm UFS/SDCC ICE a dedicated driver Abel Vesa
2023-04-06 20:34 ` Eric Biggers
2023-04-03 20:05 ` [PATCH v5 4/6] scsi: ufs: ufs-qcom: Switch to the new ICE API Abel Vesa
2023-04-06 20:16 ` Eric Biggers [this message]
2023-04-07 7:02 ` Abel Vesa
2023-04-07 17:28 ` Eric Biggers
2023-04-03 20:05 ` [PATCH v5 5/6] mmc: sdhci-msm: " Abel Vesa
2023-04-06 20:22 ` Eric Biggers
2023-04-03 20:05 ` [PATCH v5 6/6] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8550: Add the Inline Crypto Engine node Abel Vesa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230406201634.GA20288@sol.localdomain \
--to=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=abel.vesa@linaro.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=agross@kernel.org \
--cc=alim.akhtar@samsung.com \
--cc=andersson@kernel.org \
--cc=avri.altman@wdc.com \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=konrad.dybcio@linaro.org \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mani@kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).