From: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
To: Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>
Cc: Shengyu Qu <wiagn233@outlook.com>,
robh+dt@kernel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org,
wens@csie.org, lgirdwood@gmail.com, broonie@kernel.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
conor.dooley@microchip.com,
Martin Botka <martin.botka@somainline.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] mfd: axp20x: Add support for AXP15060 PMIC
Date: Wed, 3 May 2023 12:07:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230503120759.6fd6a7a9@donnerap.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230426142740.GN50521@google.com>
On Wed, 26 Apr 2023 15:27:40 +0100
Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org> wrote:
Hi Lee,
I see this patch in Linus' tree, but something must have gone wrong here,
can you please check? See below ...
> On Fri, 21 Apr 2023, Shengyu Qu wrote:
>
> > The AXP15060 is a PMIC chip produced by X-Powers, and could be connected
> > via an I2C bus.
> >
> > Describe the regmap and the MFD bits, along with the registers exposed
> > via I2C. Eventually advertise the device using a new compatible string
> > and add support for power off the system.
> >
> > The driver would disable PEK function if IRQ is not configured in device
> > tree, since some boards (For example, Starfive Visionfive 2) didn't
> > connect IRQ line of PMIC to SOC.
> >
> > GPIO function isn't enabled in this commit, since its configuration
> > operation is different from any existing AXP PMICs and needs
> > logic modification on existing driver. GPIO support might come in later
> > patches.
> >
> > ---
>
> You must not use these above the tags or Git will drop them.
>
> > Changes since v2:
> > - Rebase to AXP313a series v10 [1] + newest (20230420) -next branch
So this patch was based on the AXP313a series, but I don't see that in
Linus' tree (or in any of your trees, if I have checked correctly).
There must have been a conflict, as this [PATCH v3 2/3] diff actually lists
the axp313a entry in the context lines.
> > - Add axp_regulator_only_cells rather than directly using axp806_cells
> > for cases that IRQ line isn't connected.
> >
> > Changes since v1:
> > - Nothing
> >
> > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-sunxi/20230401001850.4988-1-andre.przywara@arm.com/
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Shengyu Qu <wiagn233@outlook.com>
> > ---
>
> Put change-logs here instead.
>
> > drivers/mfd/axp20x-i2c.c | 2 +
> > drivers/mfd/axp20x.c | 107 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > include/linux/mfd/axp20x.h | 85 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 3 files changed, 194 insertions(+)
>
> I manually added the missing tags for this and the DT patch and applied.
So this patch doesn't list any tags aside from Shengyu's
Signed-off-by. The patch in Linus' tree list a Reviewed-by: from
Krzysztof, which I don't see anywhere in the thread, he just reviewed the
binding patch, AFAICT. I see your tentative R-b: on v2, but with the
request to rebase and resend, which he did with v3. The applied patch
looks like v3, but not on the base commit this was send against.
So I am slightly confused, and am also wondering what happened to the
AXP313a patches? I see the binding patch merged, but not the MFD part,
even though you replied saying so.
Cheers,
Andre
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-03 11:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20230421150816.10513-1-wiagn233@outlook.com>
2023-04-21 15:08 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] dt-bindings: mfd: x-powers,axp152: Document the AXP15060 variant Shengyu Qu
2023-04-27 17:19 ` Lee Jones
2023-04-21 15:08 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] mfd: axp20x: Add support for AXP15060 PMIC Shengyu Qu
2023-04-26 14:27 ` Lee Jones
2023-05-03 11:07 ` Andre Przywara [this message]
2023-05-04 6:59 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-05-15 10:52 ` Lee Jones
2023-05-15 10:55 ` Lee Jones
2023-05-15 14:19 ` Shengyu Qu
2023-05-15 15:10 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-05-15 15:19 ` Andre Przywara
2023-05-15 15:28 ` Lee Jones
2023-05-15 15:44 ` Shengyu Qu
2023-05-24 0:06 ` Andre Przywara
2023-04-21 15:08 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] regulator: axp20x: Add AXP15060 support Shengyu Qu
2023-04-21 16:28 ` Mark Brown
2023-05-04 7:02 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230503120759.6fd6a7a9@donnerap.cambridge.arm.com \
--to=andre.przywara@arm.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=conor.dooley@microchip.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
--cc=lee@kernel.org \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.botka@somainline.org \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=wens@csie.org \
--cc=wiagn233@outlook.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).