From: Jim Quinlan <jim2101024@gmail.com>
To: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenz@kernel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org>,
Phil Elwell <phil@raspberrypi.com>,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com, jim2101024@gmail.com,
james.quinlan@broadcom.com
Cc: "Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kw@linux.com>,
"Conor Dooley" <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
"Florian Fainelli" <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
"Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
"Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org (open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND
FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS),
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org (moderated list:BROADCOM
BCM2711/BCM2835 ARM ARCHITECTURE),
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (open list),
linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org (moderated list:BROADCOM
BCM2711/BCM2835 ARM ARCHITECTURE)
Subject: [PATCH v5 0/5] PCI: brcmstb: Configure appropriate HW CLKREQ# mode
Date: Mon, 8 May 2023 18:01:20 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230508220126.16241-1-jim2101024@gmail.com> (raw)
v5 -- Remove DT property "brcm,completion-timeout-us" from
"DT bindings" commit. Although this error may be reported
as a completion timeout, its cause was traced to an
internal bus timeout which may occur even when there is
no PCIe access being processed. We set a timeout of four
seconds only if we are operating in "L1SS CLKREQ#" mode.
-- Correct CEM 2.0 reference provided by HW engineer,
s/3.2.5.2.5/3.2.5.2.2/ (Bjorn)
-- Add newline to dev_info() string (Stefan)
-- Change variable rval to unsigned (Stefan)
-- s/implementaion/implementation/ (Bjorn)
-- s/superpowersave/powersupersave/ (Bjorn)
-- Slightly modify message on "PERST#" commit.
-- Rebase to torvalds master
v4 -- New commit that asserts PERST# for 2711/RPi SOCs at PCIe RC
driver probe() time. This is done in Raspian Linux and its
absence may be the cause of a failing test case.
-- New commit that removes stale comment.
v3 -- Rewrote commit msgs and comments refering panics if L1SS
is enabled/disabled; the code snippet that unadvertises L1SS
eliminates the panic scenario. (Bjorn)
-- Add reference for "400ns of CLKREQ# assertion" blurb (Bjorn)
-- Put binding names in DT commit Subject (Bjorn)
-- Add a verb to a commit's subject line (Bjorn)
-- s/accomodat(\w+)/accommodat$1/g (Bjorn)
-- Rewrote commit msgs and comments refering panics if L1SS
is enabled/disabled; the code snippet that unadvertises L1SS
eliminates the panic scenario. (Bjorn)
v2 -- Changed binding property 'brcm,completion-timeout-msec' to
'brcm,completion-timeout-us'. (StefanW for standard suffix).
-- Warn when clamping timeout value, and include clamped
region in message. Also add min and max in YAML. (StefanW)
-- Qualify description of "brcm,completion-timeout-us" so that
it refers to PCIe transactions. (StefanW)
-- Remvove mention of Linux specifics in binding description. (StefanW)
-- s/clkreq#/CLKREQ#/g (Bjorn)
-- Refactor completion-timeout-us code to compare max and min to
value given by the property (as opposed to the computed value).
v1 -- The current driver assumes the downstream devices can
provide CLKREQ# for ASPM. These commits accomodate devices
w/ or w/o clkreq# and also handle L1SS-capable devices.
-- The Raspian Linux folks have already been using a PCIe RC
property "brcm,enable-l1ss". These commits use the same
property, in a backward-compatible manner, and the implementaion
adds more detail and also automatically identifies devices w/o
a clkreq# signal, i.e. most devices plugged into an RPi CM4
IO board.
Jim Quinlan (5):
dt-bindings: PCI: brcmstb: Add brcm,enable-l1ss property
PCI: brcmstb: Configure HW CLKREQ# mode appropriate for downstream
device
PCI: brcmstb: Set higher value for internal bus timeout
PCI: brcmstb: Don't assume 2711 bootloader leaves PERST# asserted
PCI: brcmstb: Remove stale comment
.../bindings/pci/brcm,stb-pcie.yaml | 9 ++
drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c | 91 ++++++++++++++++---
2 files changed, 89 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
base-commit: ac9a78681b921877518763ba0e89202254349d1b
--
2.17.1
next reply other threads:[~2023-05-08 22:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-05-08 22:01 Jim Quinlan [this message]
2023-05-08 22:01 ` [PATCH v5 1/5] dt-bindings: PCI: brcmstb: Add brcm,enable-l1ss property Jim Quinlan
2023-08-23 7:43 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
[not found] ` <CA+-6iNwP+NbAdm0kNxZ5GwyPdTQyOjq7E2O-+mCU4fG-94BKBA@mail.gmail.com>
2023-08-23 18:16 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2023-08-24 10:12 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2023-08-24 14:55 ` Jim Quinlan
2023-08-25 6:45 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2023-08-25 18:16 ` Jim Quinlan
2023-08-29 12:22 ` Rob Herring
2023-08-29 14:46 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2023-05-09 7:46 ` [PATCH v5 0/5] PCI: brcmstb: Configure appropriate HW CLKREQ# mode Cyril Brulebois
2023-05-09 11:22 ` Jim Quinlan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230508220126.16241-1-jim2101024@gmail.com \
--to=jim2101024@gmail.com \
--cc=bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=james.quinlan@broadcom.com \
--cc=kibi@debian.org \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
--cc=kw@linux.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=nsaenz@kernel.org \
--cc=phil@raspberrypi.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).