From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: Mehdi Djait <mehdi.djait.k@gmail.com>
Cc: mazziesaccount@gmail.com, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org,
andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com, robh+dt@kernel.org,
lars@metafoo.de, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 7/7] iio: accel: Add support for Kionix/ROHM KX132-1211 accelerometer
Date: Sat, 13 May 2023 18:13:23 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230513181323.165c09f2@jic23-huawei> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZFe8N8EhNTOkLO0c@carbian>
On Sun, 7 May 2023 16:56:55 +0200
Mehdi Djait <mehdi.djait.k@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello Jonathan,
>
> On Sat, May 06, 2023 at 05:46:51PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> > On Fri, 5 May 2023 20:11:33 +0200
> > Mehdi Djait <mehdi.djait.k@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hello Jonathan,
> > >
> > > On Mon, May 01, 2023 at 03:56:45PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 25 Apr 2023 00:22:27 +0200
> > > > Mehdi Djait <mehdi.djait.k@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Kionix KX132-1211 is a tri-axis 16-bit accelerometer that can support
> > > > > ranges from ±2G to ±16G, digital output through I²C/SPI.
> > > > > Add support for basic accelerometer features such as reading acceleration
> > > > > via IIO using raw reads, triggered buffer (data-ready), or the WMI IRQ.
> > > > >
> > > > > Datasheet: https://kionixfs.azureedge.net/en/document/KX132-1211-Technical-Reference-Manual-Rev-5.0.pdf
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Mehdi Djait <mehdi.djait.k@gmail.com>
> > > >
> > > > Two tiny things inline.
> > > >
> > > > > +static int kx132_get_fifo_bytes(struct kx022a_data *data)
> > > > > +{
> > > > > + struct device *dev = regmap_get_device(data->regmap);
> > > > > + __le16 buf_status;
> > > > > + int ret, fifo_bytes;
> > > > > +
> > > > > + ret = regmap_bulk_read(data->regmap, data->chip_info->buf_status1,
> > > > > + &buf_status, sizeof(buf_status));
> > > > > + if (ret) {
> > > > > + dev_err(dev, "Error reading buffer status\n");
> > > > > + return ret;
> > > > > + }
> > > > > +
> > > > > + fifo_bytes = le16_to_cpu(buf_status);
> > > > > + fifo_bytes &= data->chip_info->buf_smp_lvl_mask;
> > > >
> > > > Slight preference for FIELD_GET() as it saves me checking the mask includes
> > > > lowest bits.
> > >
> > > This will mean I have the remove the chip_info member buf_smp_lvl_mask
> > > and use KX132_MASK_BUF_SMP_LVL directly because otherwise the
> > > __builtin_constant_p function will cause an error when building.
> > > Check: https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/include/linux/bitfield.h#L65
> > >
> > > I can change it to FIELD_GET() if you want to.
> >
> > Good point. You could use le16_get_bits() though which I'm fairly sure will take
> > a variable just fine.
> >
>
> I don't think it will work.
>
> From the commit log introducing the {type}_get_bits to <linux/bitfield.h>
> " Field specification must be a constant; __builtin_constant_p() doesn't
> have to be true for it, but compiler must be able to evaluate it at
> build time. If it cannot or if the value does not encode any bitfield,
> the build will fail. "
>
> Actually Geert Uytterhoeven tried to solve excatly this issue, but it
> seems that the patch was not accepted.
> Check: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iio/3a54a6703879d10f08cf0275a2a69297ebd2b1d4.1637592133.git.geert+renesas@glider.be/
>
>
> So which solution would be the best:
>
> 1. Use directly KX132_MASK_BUF_SMP_LVL, the only reason I was trying to
> avoid this was to make this function generic enough for other chip
> variants
>
> 2. Copy the field_get() definition from drivers/clk/at91 or from the commit
> of Geert and use it in this driver
>
> 3. leave it as it is ?
This fine. Sorry for the diversion to nowhere!
Jonathan
>
> 4. another solution ?
>
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > +
> > > > > + return fifo_bytes;
> > > > > +}
> > > > > +
> > > > > static int __kx022a_fifo_flush(struct iio_dev *idev, unsigned int samples,
> > > > > bool irq)
> > > > > {
> > > > > @@ -1036,6 +1157,32 @@ const struct kx022a_chip_info kx022a_chip_info = {
> > > > > };
> > > > > EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(kx022a_chip_info, IIO_KX022A);
> > > > >
> > > > > +const struct kx022a_chip_info kx132_chip_info = {
> > > > > + .name = "kx132-1211",
> > > > > + .regmap_config = &kx132_regmap_config,
> > > > > + .channels = kx132_channels,
> > > > > + .num_channels = ARRAY_SIZE(kx132_channels),
> > > > > + .fifo_length = KX132_FIFO_LENGTH,
> > > > > + .who = KX132_REG_WHO,
> > > > > + .id = KX132_ID,
> > > > > + .cntl = KX132_REG_CNTL,
> > > > > + .cntl2 = KX132_REG_CNTL2,
> > > > > + .odcntl = KX132_REG_ODCNTL,
> > > > > + .buf_cntl1 = KX132_REG_BUF_CNTL1,
> > > > > + .buf_cntl2 = KX132_REG_BUF_CNTL2,
> > > > > + .buf_clear = KX132_REG_BUF_CLEAR,
> > > > > + .buf_status1 = KX132_REG_BUF_STATUS_1,
> > > > > + .buf_smp_lvl_mask = KX132_MASK_BUF_SMP_LVL,
> > > >
> > > > There are some things in here (typically where the define isn't used
> > > > anywhere else) where I think it would be easier to follow if the
> > > > value was listed here. Masks and IDs for example.
> > > >
> > >
> > > After removing buf_smp_lvl_mask, which members will be easier to understand (besides id) ?
> >
> > I haven't gone through them. Length seems an obvious one. It's a number not a magic value.
> > Register addresses might also be simpler if they aren't used elsewhere.
> >
> > Not really about understanding just about a define that adds nothing if all we do is
> > assign it to a variable of the same name.
>
> Do you have a strong opinion about this ?
>
> I would really prefer to leave it like this, for the following reasons:
>
> 1. If I directly use values here, I have to do it also in the previous
> patch where I introduce the chip_info for the kx022a -> this means I
> will have defines in the h file which are not used at all -> the defines should
> be deleted -> the patch will get unnecessarily bigger. I received
> multiple comments about removing unnecessary changes and reducing of the
> patch size when possible.
>
> 2. Consistency: having all the defines in one place really seems to be
> better for understanding IMO. I find the mix of values and defines in
> the chip-info a bit confusing, e.g., I will use the direct value for
> KX132_REG_CNTL but not for KX132_REG_CNTL2 because KX132_REG_CNTL2 is
> referenced in a regmap_range.
>
> --
> Kind Regards
> Mehdi Djait
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-13 16:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-24 22:22 [PATCH v3 0/7] iio: accel: Add support for Kionix/ROHM KX132-1211 accelerometer Mehdi Djait
2023-04-24 22:22 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] dt-bindings: iio: Add " Mehdi Djait
2023-04-24 22:22 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] iio: accel: kionix-kx022a: Remove blank lines Mehdi Djait
2023-04-25 5:26 ` Matti Vaittinen
2023-04-24 22:22 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] iio: accel: kionix-kx022a: Warn on failed matches and assume compatibility Mehdi Djait
2023-04-24 22:22 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] iio: accel: kionix-kx022a: Add an i2c_device_id table Mehdi Djait
2023-04-25 5:31 ` Matti Vaittinen
2023-05-01 14:42 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-04-25 13:40 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-04-29 13:10 ` Mehdi Djait
2023-04-24 22:22 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] iio: accel: kionix-kx022a: Refactor driver and add chip_info structure Mehdi Djait
2023-04-25 6:50 ` Matti Vaittinen
2023-04-25 7:24 ` Mehdi Djait
2023-04-25 8:12 ` Matti Vaittinen
2023-04-29 12:59 ` Mehdi Djait
2023-04-29 13:56 ` Matti Vaittinen
2023-05-01 14:50 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-05-07 20:45 ` Mehdi Djait
2023-05-08 6:12 ` Matti Vaittinen
2023-04-25 15:57 ` Andi Shyti
2023-04-29 13:07 ` Mehdi Djait
2023-04-30 17:49 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-05-02 19:41 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-05-05 18:12 ` Mehdi Djait
2023-04-24 22:22 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] iio: accel: kionix-kx022a: Add a function to retrieve number of bytes in buffer Mehdi Djait
2023-04-25 7:07 ` Matti Vaittinen
2023-04-25 7:26 ` Mehdi Djait
2023-04-24 22:22 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] iio: accel: Add support for Kionix/ROHM KX132-1211 accelerometer Mehdi Djait
2023-04-25 8:06 ` Matti Vaittinen
2023-05-01 15:04 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-05-01 14:56 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-05-05 18:11 ` Mehdi Djait
2023-05-06 16:46 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-05-07 14:56 ` Mehdi Djait
2023-05-13 17:13 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230513181323.165c09f2@jic23-huawei \
--to=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
--cc=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mazziesaccount@gmail.com \
--cc=mehdi.djait.k@gmail.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).