From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B49EC7EE2F for ; Mon, 15 May 2023 17:20:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S243933AbjEORUS (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 May 2023 13:20:18 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:33366 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S243965AbjEORTr (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 May 2023 13:19:47 -0400 Received: from mail.andi.de1.cc (mail.andi.de1.cc [IPv6:2a02:c205:3004:2154::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CFA7A49D5; Mon, 15 May 2023 10:17:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from p5dc58da0.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([93.197.141.160] helo=aktux) by mail.andi.de1.cc with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1pybpK-0004pc-2e; Mon, 15 May 2023 19:17:38 +0200 Date: Mon, 15 May 2023 19:17:35 +0200 From: Andreas Kemnade To: Tony Lindgren Cc: arnd@arndb.de, olof@lixom.net, soc@kernel.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org, bcousson@baylibre.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: omap4: add initial support for Epson Moverio BT-200 Message-ID: <20230515191735.6d671ef1@aktux> In-Reply-To: <20230327082137.GH7501@atomide.com> References: <20230313110409.2294154-1-andreas@kemnade.info> <20230327082137.GH7501@atomide.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.1.1 (GTK 3.24.24; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Hi, On Mon, 27 Mar 2023 11:21:37 +0300 Tony Lindgren wrote: > * Andreas Kemnade [230313 13:04]: > > yes, epson,embt2ws is unknown, is the txt->yaml conversion around the > > corner? I would then resubmit it includding an addition > > to that yaml. If not probably I resubmit the conversion patch with > > the compatible added. But that should not stop the rest of this patch from > > being reviewed. > > Yeah let's do the yaml conversion first as otherwise we'll be adding some > extra warnings for the dt folks. > > Your patch looks otherwise OK to me. > do you expect any action from me here? As Krzysztof has given his Reviewed-by on the conversion patch, I would expect that it gets in right after that omap.yaml conversion patch if nobody objects. Regards, Andreas