From: Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>
To: palmer@dabbelt.com
Cc: conor@kernel.org, Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>,
Sunil V L <sunilvl@ventanamicro.com>,
Yangyu Chen <cyy@cyyself.name>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 5/8] RISC-V: rework comments in ISA string parser
Date: Thu, 18 May 2023 23:39:06 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230518-tactless-ascent-6b74f1119336@spud> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230518-moneybags-rebalance-1484db493d6a@spud>
From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
I have found these comments to not be at all helpful whenever I look at
the parser. Further, the comments in the default case (single letter
parser) are not quite right either.
Group the comments into a larger one at the start of each case, that
attempts to explain things at a higher level.
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
---
arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c | 70 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 59 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c
index a79c5c52a174..cc5189c7c64e 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c
@@ -146,7 +146,7 @@ void __init riscv_fill_hwcap(void)
switch (*ext) {
case 's':
- /**
+ /*
* Workaround for invalid single-letter 's' & 'u'(QEMU).
* No need to set the bit in riscv_isa as 's' & 'u' are
* not valid ISA extensions. It works until multi-letter
@@ -163,53 +163,101 @@ void __init riscv_fill_hwcap(void)
case 'X':
case 'z':
case 'Z':
+ /*
+ * Before attempting to parse the extension itself, we find its end.
+ * As multi-letter extensions must be split from other multi-letter
+ * extensions with an "_", the end of a multi-letter extension will
+ * either be the null character or the "_" at the start of the next
+ * multi-letter extension.
+ *
+ * Next, as the extensions version is currently ignored, we
+ * eliminate that portion. This is done by parsing backwards from
+ * the end of the extension, removing any numbers. This may be a
+ * major or minor number however, so the process is repeated if a
+ * minor number was found.
+ *
+ * ext_end is intended to represent the first character *after* the
+ * name portion of an extension, but will be decremented to the last
+ * character itself while eliminating the extensions version number.
+ * A simple re-increment solves this problem.
+ */
ext_long = true;
- /* Multi-letter extension must be delimited */
for (; *isa && *isa != '_'; ++isa)
if (unlikely(!isalnum(*isa)))
ext_err = true;
- /* Parse backwards */
+
ext_end = isa;
if (unlikely(ext_err))
break;
+
if (!isdigit(ext_end[-1]))
break;
- /* Skip the minor version */
+
while (isdigit(*--ext_end))
;
- if (tolower(ext_end[0]) != 'p'
- || !isdigit(ext_end[-1])) {
- /* Advance it to offset the pre-decrement */
+
+ if (tolower(ext_end[0]) != 'p' || !isdigit(ext_end[-1])) {
++ext_end;
break;
}
- /* Skip the major version */
+
while (isdigit(*--ext_end))
;
+
++ext_end;
break;
default:
+ /*
+ * Things are a little easier for single-letter extensions, as they
+ * are parsed forwards.
+ *
+ * After checking that our starting position is valid, we need to
+ * ensure that, when isa was incremented at the start of the loop,
+ * that it arrived at the start of the next extension.
+ *
+ * If we are already on a non-digit, there is nothing to do. Either
+ * we have a multi-letter extension's _, or the start of an
+ * extension.
+ *
+ * Otherwise we have found the current extension's major version
+ * number. Parse past it, and a subsequent p/minor version number
+ * if present. The `p` extension must not appear immediately after
+ * a number, so there is no fear of missing it.
+ *
+ */
if (unlikely(!isalpha(*ext))) {
ext_err = true;
break;
}
- /* Find next extension */
+
if (!isdigit(*isa))
break;
- /* Skip the minor version */
+
while (isdigit(*++isa))
;
+
if (tolower(*isa) != 'p')
break;
+
if (!isdigit(*++isa)) {
--isa;
break;
}
- /* Skip the major version */
+
while (isdigit(*++isa))
;
+
break;
}
+
+ /*
+ * The parser expects that at the start of an iteration isa points to the
+ * character before the start of the next extension. This will not be the
+ * case if we have just parsed a single-letter extension and the next
+ * extension is not a multi-letter extension prefixed with an "_". It is
+ * also not the case at the end of the string, where it will point to the
+ * terminating null character.
+ */
if (*isa != '_')
--isa;
--
2.39.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-18 22:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-05-18 22:39 [PATCH v2 0/8] ISA string parser cleanups++ Conor Dooley
2023-05-18 22:39 ` [PATCH v2 1/8] RISC-V: simplify register width check in ISA string parsing Conor Dooley
2023-05-18 22:39 ` [PATCH v2 2/8] RISC-V: only iterate over possible CPUs in ISA string parser Conor Dooley
2023-05-18 22:39 ` [PATCH v2 3/8] RISC-V: split early & late of_node to hartid mapping Conor Dooley
2023-05-18 22:39 ` [PATCH v2 4/8] RISC-V: validate riscv,isa at boot, not during ISA string parsing Conor Dooley
2023-05-18 22:39 ` Conor Dooley [this message]
2023-05-18 22:39 ` [PATCH v2 6/8] RISC-V: remove decrement/increment dance in ISA string parser Conor Dooley
2023-05-18 22:39 ` [PATCH v2 7/8] dt-bindings: riscv: explicitly mention assumption of Zicntr & Zihpm support Conor Dooley
2023-05-18 22:39 ` [PATCH v2 8/8] RISC-V: always report presence of extenstions formerly part of the base ISA Conor Dooley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230518-tactless-ascent-6b74f1119336@spud \
--to=conor@kernel.org \
--cc=ajones@ventanamicro.com \
--cc=conor.dooley@microchip.com \
--cc=cyy@cyyself.name \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=sunilvl@ventanamicro.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).