From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14DDFEB64DB for ; Thu, 15 Jun 2023 09:09:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S245310AbjFOJI6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Jun 2023 05:08:58 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:47040 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S245399AbjFOJIw (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Jun 2023 05:08:52 -0400 Received: from elvis.franken.de (elvis.franken.de [193.175.24.41]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48004296E; Thu, 15 Jun 2023 02:08:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from uucp by elvis.franken.de with local-rmail (Exim 3.36 #1) id 1q9ixo-0005Cv-00; Thu, 15 Jun 2023 11:08:20 +0200 Received: by alpha.franken.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 95D84C02FB; Thu, 15 Jun 2023 11:08:04 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2023 11:08:04 +0200 From: Thomas Bogendoerfer To: Paul Cercueil Cc: "H. Nikolaus Schaller" , list@opendingux.net, Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Conor Dooley , linux-mips@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] MIPS: CI20: Add WiFi / Bluetooth support Message-ID: <20230615090804.GA8625@alpha.franken.de> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jun 15, 2023 at 10:39:53AM +0200, Paul Cercueil wrote: > Thomas: are you able to drop this series from mips-next, or should I/we send fixup patches instead? as I'm not rebasing mips-next I need fixup patches. This won't solve bisectability, but not doing rebases is the what Linus prefers. Thomas. -- Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a good idea. [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]