Re: [PATCH v2 00/17] Prevent NAND chip unevaluated properties

[Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>]

Hi Krzysztof,

miquel.raynal@bootlin.com wrote on Tue, 13 Jun 2023 13:43:50 +0200:

> Hi Krzysztof,
> 
> krzk@kernel.org wrote on Sat, 10 Jun 2023 11:27:55 +0200:
> 
> > On 06/06/2023 19:52, Miquel Raynal wrote:  
> > > As discussed with Krzysztof and Chris, it seems like each NAND
> > > controller binding should actually restrain the properties allowed in
> > > the NAND chip node with its own "unevaluatedProperties: false". This
> > > only works if we reference a yaml schema which contains all the possible
> > > properties *in the NAND chip node*. Indeed, the NAND controller yaml
> > > schema contains properties for the NAND chip which are not evaluated
> > > with this construction.
> > > 
> > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/a23dd485-a3d9-e31f-be3e-0ab293fcfc4a@linaro.org/    
> > 
> > Please rebase on latest kernel. This is some very old tree if you CC
> > this address.  
> 
> Sorry for the trouble, it was a hardcoded address on my side. I've
> updated the address to
> 
> 	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>
> 
> The series is based on v6.4-rc1. Against what branch/tag do you want it
> to be rebased?

When I asked this question I forgot I usually apply mtd bindings in my
own tree :) I usually do it after receiving at least one R-by on the
whole series, but here as I'm the author I would just like to get
confirmation from you Krzysztof that I can go ahead (or if you prefer
to take it, or maybe want to give this another look later).

Thanks,
Miquèl