Re: [PATCH v2 02/17] dt-bindings: mtd: Create a file for raw NAND chip properties

[Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>]

Hi Krzysztof,

krzk@kernel.org wrote on Mon, 19 Jun 2023 08:28:28 +0200:

> On 06/06/2023 19:52, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> > In an effort to constrain as much as we can the existing binding, we
> > want to add "unevaluatedProperties: false" in all the NAND chip
> > descriptions part of NAND controller bindings. But in order to do that
> > properly, we also need to reference a file which contains all the
> > "allowed" properties. Right now this file is nand-chip.yaml but in
> > practice raw NAND controllers may use additional properties in their
> > NAND chip children node. These properties are listed under
> > nand-controller.yaml, which makes the "unevaluatedProperties" checks
> > fail while the description are valid. We need to move these NAND chip
> > related properties into another file, because we do not want to pollute
> > nand-chip.yaml which is also referenced by eg. SPI-NAND devices.
> > 
> > Let's create a raw-nand-chip.yaml file to reference all the properties a
> > raw NAND chip description can contain. The chain of inheritance becomes:
> >   nand-controller.yaml <- raw-nand-chip.yaml
> >   raw-nand-chip.yaml   <- nand-chip.yaml
> >   spi-nand.yaml        <- nand-chip.yaml  
> 
> ...
> 
> > -  The interpretation of these parameters is implementation-defined, so
> > -  not all implementations must support all possible
> > -  combinations. However, implementations are encouraged to further
> > -  specify the value(s) they support.
> > -
> >  properties:
> >    $nodename:
> >      pattern: "^nand-controller(@.*)?"
> > @@ -51,79 +41,8 @@ properties:
> >  
> >  patternProperties:
> >    "^nand@[a-f0-9]$":
> > -    $ref: "nand-chip.yaml#"  
> 
> You work on some old tree, judging by email addresses you CC and by
> this. I would expect here current next, but this is even pre v6.4-rc1!
> Working on something older than current master branch doss not make any
> sense.

This is really based on v6.4-rc1, I think Rob's tooling is applying the
patches against -rc1 so I try to keep the robots happy by picking that
tag as base. I know you are removing the quotes so I went through my
series and dropped them from all the files which now reference
raw-nand-chip.yaml, but of course I missed that one, I am sorry, I will
drop the quotes here as well.

Thanks,
Miquèl