Re: [RFC PATCH v3 0/3] support 512B ECC step size for Meson NAND

[Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>]

Hi Arseniy,

avkrasnov@sberdevices.ru wrote on Sat, 15 Jul 2023 20:48:34 +0300:

> Hello Miquel!
> 
> On 15.07.2023 19:15, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> > Hi Arseniy,
> > 
> > AVKrasnov@sberdevices.ru wrote on Tue, 11 Jul 2023 15:21:26 +0300:
> >   
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> this patchset adds support for 512B ECC step size for Meson NAND. Current
> >> implementation only supports 1024B. There are three patches:
> >>
> >> 1) Update for device tree bindings to replace 'const' type of field
> >>    'nand-ecc-step-size' with 'enum' which contains 512 and 1024.
> >>
> >> 2) Update for device tree bindings to add dependency between properties
> >>    'nand-ecc-strength' and 'nand-ecc-step-size'.
> >>
> >> 3) Update for Meson driver - new enum value for 512B ECC and reworked
> >>    ECC capabilities structure to support both 512B and 1024B ECC. By
> >>    default this driver uses 1024B ECC, 512B could be enabled in device
> >>    tree.  
> > 
> > This series does not apply correctly on nand/next, would you mind
> > rebasing (nand/next on linux-mtd) and sending it again?  
> 
> Sure, as I see 0001 was applied to nand/next, so I can resend only 0002 and 0003,
> as 0002 is the first patch which fails to apply?

Yes indeed.

> 
> > 
> > BTW the "rfc" prefix is only needed for the "first" submission, when
> > you try something "new", otherwise it is no longer required.  
> 
> Ok, got it
> 
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Miquèl  
> 
> Thanks, Arseniy


Thanks,
Miquèl